VincentRJ

The love of money is the root of all evil. Don't Buddhists understand this? 😒

In case anyone is confused. From the article: "Iceberg A23a, a massive block of ice covering around 3,500 square kilometres – an area over twice the size of Greater Bangkok – has been lodged off South Georgia Island, near Antarctica since it detached from the ice sheet in 1986." In other words, the ice of Iceberg A23a was already in the sea in 1986. The detachment from the ice sheet does not cause any sea-level rise. When sea water freezes, there is no fall in sea level. When the ice melts, there is no rise in sea levels. However, when the origin of the iceberg is due to a melting glacier on land, which slides into the sea, then the sea-level immediately rises because of the additional water in the form of ice, but the sea-level does not continue to rise as the iceberg melts.

Good point! The relevant quote from the article: "Adding to these concerns, the influx of fresh meltwater from A23a is likely to elevate sea levels, with implications for coastal areas." What nonsense!

Porn is not allowed on this site. Didn't you know? 🤣

“Today is the greatest day of deregulation our nation has seen. We are driving a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion to drive down cost of living for American families, unleash American energy, bring auto jobs back to the U.S. and more,” said EPA Administrator Zeldin. “Alongside President Trump, we are living up to our promises to unleash American energy, lower costs for Americans, revitalize the American auto industry, and work hand-in-hand with our state partners to advance our shared mission,” added EPA Administrator Zeldin. Watch the video below for more information.

Yet the Danes have a higher quality of life than the average American.

Thanks for the information. I wasn't aware that a major reason for Denmark's high electricity prices is due to its high taxation on the electricity. It seems that Denmark is one of the lucky countries with ideal locations and wind conditions that are suitable for wind turbines. "Denmark experiences relatively strong and consistent winds, particularly along its coastline, which is ideal for wind turbine placement. With over 7,000 kilometers of coastline, Denmark has ample space for both onshore and offshore wind farms." Also, I wasn't aware that Denmark's initial subsidies for wind power, including capital grants, were progressively reduced and eventually repealed in 1988 as reliability and cost-effectiveness improved. However, it seems this is about to change, according to the following news item. "COPENHAGEN, Jan 31 (Reuters) - Denmark will halt all ongoing offshore wind tenders as the existing framework where no subsidies are offered does not work under current market conditions, its energy minister said on Friday. The global offshore wind industry has been hit by surging costs, rising interest rates and supply chain bottlenecks. Denmark said in December that its latest tender for wind at sea had failed to attract any bids." https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/denmark-halt-offshore-wind-tenders-revamp-subsidy-model-2025-01-31/

Do you not know the distinction between 'falling costs' and 'plummeting costs'? 🤣 I have no objection to the development of battery storage and BEVs, but they are still too expensive for me.

How can you get things so wrong? 🤣 "Moving water is by far the most important form of renewable energy source in Canada, providing 61.7 percent of Canada's electricity generation in 2022. In fact, Canada is the third largest producer of hydroelectricity in the world." If you check the following site you can see that wind and solar represent just 8% of Canada's electricity supply, although that has risen to around 10% in 2024. https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+source+of+most+of+Canada's+renewable+energy&rlz=1C1CHBF_enAU879AU879&oq=what+is+the+source+of+most+of+Canada's+renewable+energy&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigAdIBCjQ3MzM2ajBqMTWoAgiwAgHxBexKHSV3tTyx&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#vhid=vtRDbQcDeSWCnM&vssid=l The country which produces the most energy from wind and solar is Denmark, which is amongst the top ten countries with the highest electricity prices in the world.

I'm surprised there has been no mention in this long thread of Trump's plan to stop wasting money on inefficient renewables, such as wind turbines and solar farms, which produce intermittent and unreliable energy, and rely upon huge amounts of government subsidies which result in high electricity prices. The two fundamentals of economic prosperity are the true cost of energy, and the ways we use that energy. A country can compensate for high energy costs by using the energy more efficiently, but cannot compete with a country that has low energy costs and also uses the energy efficiently. The reason why China can produce such inexpensive products which they export to the world, is because they use less expensive energy sources, such as fossil fuels and nuclear power, and use those energy sources very efficiently, by paying workers less, and using advanced technology. The purpose of Trump's tarrifs on certain imported products is to encourage the production of those products in the USA. However, unless energy costs in the USA drop, the prices of such products will rise and the cost of living for most USA citizens will also rise. But this is not the plan. The plan is to reduce the true cost of energy, and use that energy more efficiently, which includes reducing the massive subsidies to stupid renewable projects. Drill, baby, drill!

Hi Rocky, I did a Google search on the meaning of the Buddhist quote: "that which was never born, can never die". Following is the answer, which was AI generated. "In Buddhism, the phrase "that which was never born can never die" refers to the concept of "anatta" (no-self), meaning that there is no permanent, unchanging soul or self that is born and dies; instead, our experience of life is a continuous flow of impermanent phenomena, so the "self" we perceive is simply a collection of constantly changing sensations and perceptions, which therefore cannot be said to have a true beginning or end."

Hi Rocky, I don't know why most people turn to Buddhism, who haven't been brought up in a Buddhist culture. One would need to conduct a widespread, world-wide poll to find the answers. However, I suspect that those in Western countries, who do not have a religious faith, and who are agnostics or aetheists, find that Buddhism, in relation to the basic teachings of Gautama, is a rational alternative to religious dogma, and many of those basic teachings accord more with the understanding of modern science, than other religions do. A couple of examples are: "nothing is permanent, and everything is subject to cause and effect." As I understand, the term Nirvana refers to the extinction of greed, ill will, attachment to things and the delusions in the mind, which are the cause of the various types of suffering that most of us experience to some degree. The concept of 'eternal existence in the state of Nibbana' seems contradictory to the basic Buddhist concept that there is no permanent soul or self.

I achieve awakening every morning when I wake up from around 7 hours of sleep. We know that people can have all sorts of experiences, related to their inheritance characteristics, environmental conditions and events, education, lifestyle practices, and so on. However, these are individual experiences that might not represent a reality that applies to others. We are all different to some degree. The story of the Buddha's first departure from the palace is quite extraordinary. He was 29 years old, yet wasn't aware that everyone eventually becomes sick and dies. His charioteer, Channa, had to explain that to him. The background for this, is that Gautama was protected from such basic knowledge whilst growing up in the palace. Imagine what it would be like to be 29 years old yet not be aware that people get sick and die from all sorts of causes, then suddenly realize that this is a normal state of affairs. I think most people, at the age of 29, would be very shocked, as Gautama was.

My interest in Buddhism is mainly from a philosophical perspective. I find wisdom in many of the teachings that make practical sense and do work to reduce suffering. However, there's also a lot of unbelievable stuff in the scriptures, which I'd describe as 'mumbo jumbo'. Consciousness is the state of being aware of oneself and the environment. In order to function in life and understand our environment, and ourselves, we begin by learning to identify and name separate items. Dualism is prevalent. However, all such naming and understanding is reliant upon consciousness. There are hundreds of different scientific disciplines, and hundreds of thousands of different words used to name these separate or different items. Consciousness is one of them, and there are a number of scientific disciplines investigating the nature of consciousness. However, there is a major problem in the study of consciousness that seems impossible to overcome. The methodology of science requires objectivity. In other words, we try to separate the personal characteristics of the observer from the item that is being investigated. Therefore, in order to study consciousness effectively, and arrive at a complete and objective understanding, we would have to separate consciouness from consciousness. How is that possible? In order to study the functions of the mind, we separate the mind from the body and observe the nuerological effects in the mind and its effects on our emotions and the body, using our consciousness as the observer. In my opinion, the Vedic and Buddhist concept of reincarnation, whereby some sort of consciousness survives the death of the individual, and injects itself into another lifeform at the beginning of its birth, is based on a dualism, that is, a separation of consciousness from the body. In my view, consciousness and the body and mind, are one integrated whole. When a person dies, consciousness dies. But I could be wrong.

I just did an internet search for electricity prices in Asean countries. Thailand is not too bad; 5th lowest out of ten countries. https://www.lekise.com/en/blog/2024/08/how-do-thailands-electricity-costs-compare-to-other-asean-countries 1. Singapore average 8.01 Baht/Unit 2. Philippines average 7.10 Baht/Unit 3. Cambodia average 5.45 Baht/Unit 4. Indonesia average 4.21 Baht/Unit 5. Thailand average 4.18 Bht/Unit 6. Vietnam average 3.57 Baht/Unit 7. Laos average 2.29 Baht/Unit 8. Malaysia average 1.80 Baht/Unit 9. Myanmar average 1.70 Baht/Unit 10. Brunei average 1.48 Baht/Unit