snarky66

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

Permit me to add...Joe Biden

I like Joe Biden, and he's been a good VP.

He has certainly done his job by protecting Obama from any hints of impeachment.

After all he is next in line.

Hillary is next in line.

.

Which just goes to show how weak the Democrat bench is. Hillary Clinton? give me a break. BJ Billy as the first husband? that would be hilarious.

Ted Cruz is a rockstar. I would follow him to the gates of hell. Ted Cruz is the man. however I'll have to look at electability. and that is why my dream ticket right now is Walker / Rubio.

No matter who the Republicans select in the end it should be a cakewalk against whatever lame brain the libs try to run.

Do you think that Cory Booker is getting phone calls? How about that other hack from Virginia, Webb?

O yeah & one more thing. Cruz will not need to seal his records like the current pretender in chief.

Cruz is about 50 times smarter than anyone in the lib party

Former Solicitor General of Texas. Unlike Barack and Hillary this guy has held a real job and has real experience. As far as that hack Joe Biden he has been a politician since he was in his twenties.

Good. I hope she is the eventual nominee. Unfortunately she is under attack from Valerie Jarrett.

There is every indication the police officers were shot with a high powered rifle equipped with a scope. a scary scenario

Don't worry slick. Conservatives don't need to go after Mrs Clinton. She is doing a fantastic job of destroying herself. We are going to let her run with the ball.

Did anybody hear Mrs Clinton say " I'm sorry I broke the law" No what you heard was "No laws were broken".

Kind of reminds one of the words "I never had sex with that woman, Ms Lewinsky. Never not once". LOL

The arrogance of these people is astounding.

Breaking news: Missouri State Patrol and the st. Louis County Sheriff's Department will be supervising tonight's protests. God forbid they should have to shoot any of the radical leftists. We do not need another Kent State.

Under Holder cop haters have been given the green light.

We had an incident here in Denver where radical leftists threw red paint on the fallen officers memorial. The rat chief of police told his officers to stand down. 2 miscreants were later charged with criminal mischief and let go the same day.

So if there's a huge division in the country right now this is the cause of it. you have the Al Franken Elizabeth Warren nut job wing on one side and the rest of us on the other.

Richard Nixon desegregated the schools peacefully. so as I said before Democrats need to stop telling the lie that they were the champions of civil rights for blacks. That is just a flat out lie.

What does that have to do with Hillary Clinton breaking the law?

She broke the law? Really? Has she been convicted?

I know the republicans spent well over $200,000,000 of taxpayers money, on lawyers digging up dirt. But I didn't hear she was actually convicted of crimes.

You might want to check your sources.

The gentleman above asked for some clarification regarding they 401K plan so I explained how 220,000,000 Americans with a 401K can protect their nest egg from a market crash by using 'stops' and keep the amazing 200%+ gains under the current administration.

what on earth are you talking about? we spent 200 million dollars investigating Hillary? you would need to provide some evidence of that. otherwise just retract. BJ Billy was impeached and disbarred for lying to a federal judge. Missed removal by one vote.

The radical left have taken their protests to a new level.

2 police shot in the aftermath.

What does that have to do with Hillary Clinton breaking the law?

This is the third such thread on this topic. Deflection.

Podesta & Co hope we get tired of talking about it.

Yes that freedom, liberty & lower taxes are horrible.

I think I'll choose the left wing nanny state.

One thing that we know and is not in dispute. Mrs Clinton put our national security at risk with this stupid stunt.

I think if you read back when the story first appeared, you will find that her private email account was considered to be at a less risk to be hacked than a government email.

So actually she didn't put national security at risk with her actions, rather the opposite.

Only if you believe her BS story. And you would need to be pretty gullible for that to happen.