Laughing Gravy

1 hour ago, daveAustin said:

The disparity between quality and value for money has to be one of the biggest in the world. Let's face it, the 'beer' here is now worse than ever since the doctoring of recipes over the last few years.

Exactly. Heineken here tastes nothing like Heineken In Holland or anywhere else I have tried it. Tiger is nothing like the Tiger in Singapore. I am still waiting (hopelessly) for the ASEAN trade agreement to start allowing other beers in, without penalty of taxation. I know it will be a long time, as the breweries know they would be out, as many beers in Asia taste much better and are as cheap if not cheaper.

The price of beer here is over priced anyway for the sewage they produce and call it lager. If it doubled then that would be the end of the industry IMHO. I wouldn't be surprised if some price went on.

6 minutes ago, Shawn0000 said:

 

Iran in the 70's, these people aren't living in another century with their beliefs or practices, that nonsense is 100% imposed upon them, they do not take that which is imposed on them with them, they escape from it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is before the Islamic revelation in the 1970s. Not Syria. But look at Iran now and most of the Middle East. Extremism. Your picture looks great in Iran. That is far from a true account of the place now and the same for Syria and the middle east/

1 hour ago, heroKK said:

The Assad family has been ruling Syria for the last 40 years, it was peaceful country with different ethnic and religious groups living all in harmony. Maybe this war got something to do with the Qatari pipeline gas or Israel wanting to annex the Golan forever as Bibi said ?

I have to question which history book you have read, Harmony?. Like  most of the middle East it is run by war lords (now called Kings) With  different Muslim factions, some accepting Christians to an extent but all hate each other and fighting for power and land. It is an antiquated religion and most are living in another century with their beliefs and practices. 

On ‎2‎/‎24‎/‎2017 at 4:19 PM, mike324 said:

The thing is Trump mixes his words, large scale immigration has been working out just fine for many countries including USA. But Trump mixes it with large scale refugee immigration, I don't think anybody ever said large scale refugee immigration is working good for any country.

 

The world is at a crisis, countries like Sweden are trying to be good and save some lives, yet the best Trump can do is make fun of them.  People like Trump is whats wrong with the world, many of his followers can't distinguish between fact and fiction.

 

Trumps immigration issue is being blown way out of proportion by both sides in my opinion.

You are entitled to your opinion. I have lived in a couple of Muslim countries and I can tell you that they are not a modern thinking, equality, forward thinking places to live. People seem to be wanting to leave, which I understand but bring their ideology with them. Sweden have tried very patiently but are now realizing 'oil and water' do not mix. Very much like Marxism and Communism, it sounds great on paper but in reality it isn't and doesn't work. This is like the immigration and globalization which is policy. It isn't working and never will. The liberals and left will have you believe it will work. History will once again prove it will not. 

What is wrong with caring and putting your own country first? The annoying thing for me is that one time you were a patriot. Now you are classed as a racist, which is rubbish. Sadly that's the rhetoric that people say, when you have a difference of opinion to them, that goes against the globalization and cultural integration. It is the PC's answer that is picked up by the liberal media.

An article today from the UK Telegraph.

"These issues all fit a certain description. They stem from Sweden’s decision to take larger numbers than it could cope with, leading to problems that were once never thought possible. It will pain the Swedish government to admit it. But on this point, at least, Donald Trump was right"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/23/wont-admit-stockholm-donald-trump-right-immigration-sweden/

2 minutes ago, shady86 said:

Motorcycle should have slowed down or check the the car in front. A car slowing down towards a junction clearly send a signal of the driver making a turn soon. Feel sorry for the girl as she was using the correct lane.

I agree with you but that is typical Thai driving with no concern for others, no indication of what you are doing, no peripheral vision, no spatial awareness, to name just a few.

20 minutes ago, greenchair said:

they all make mistakes sometimes

This is not a mistake it is abuse and anyone in education or even half of a brain, would/should never ever do this. Period.

Sadly I saw this on Thai TV. An absolute disgrace near the children and in public. Also I still don't know why we have to see sickening events like this on TV, along with dead bodies etc. I hope he gets the full penalty.  

13 hours ago, Andaman Al said:

 

AH I see , but it's ok for you to call anyone that opposes Trump a 'Lefty Liberal'. I have never ever voted Liberal or endorsed Liberal policies. I was a career military man and am definitely well right of centre. But my political leanings do not cloud my vision and I can quite easily see that when Trump stands shoulder to shoulder compared to other men he is a complete grade A w*****. His ego is so large it is quite possible he could die of ego overload when he enters the golden carriage with Her Majesty. I really do hope that William or Harry may be permitted to sit in the carriage to ensure that the Donald does not try and grab Her Majesty's private parts.

It was actually a bit of banter with Grouse about calling me a conservative voter. I have never said anyone who opposes Trump is a lefty liberal . I believe lots of them are. So an ex military man too would you not be on parade for the state visit? I imagine you would. I did also state that I am not a huge fan of Trump either but I don't get what all the fuss is about when lots of other leaders who are worse than him (he has only been in office a month) have had a state visit.

16 hours ago, pitrevie said:

What you mean like the British referendum where the EU declared within hours that they respected the decision of the British people  and that they should go as soon as possible and which I heartily agree with.

However to my knowledge we haven't yet held a referendum on whether to invite Trump for a State visit but I give my solemn pledge if we do I will respect the result, how about you?

I would respect every referendum result. I don't believe we should have a referendum for every occasion like whether trump should come to the UK or not. To costly and a waste of money. If people are unhappy then vote at the next election.

Just now, Grouse said:

I would urge caution before ditching all that wisdom and experience to rely solely upon the many twits and cynical b*st*rds in the commons! It's worked well for a VERY long time.

I sad reforming Grouse not ditching. I would like to see less political party alignment and also less hereditary peers.

1 hour ago, pitrevie said:

Perhaps we need to hold a referendum to see if the majority of British people support this decision.

it seems to be the way now for everything when people don't like a result or until they get the answer they were after. Ireland, Holland as examples.

1 hour ago, Grouse said:

You obviously missed the irony in my statement. You never see me "waving the democracy flag"

 

Your beloved Con Party keeps using "democracy" to explain why it will not consider any points however sensible concerning Brexit which was approved by 52% of those who voted.

 

6 times as many people petitioned to stop a STATE visit for Trump as those in favour. (You do understand the difference between on official visit and a state visit)

 

Anyway, I look forward to seeing your man Trump addressing both houses with no TelePrompTer and then facing 30mins of questions! Can one purchase seats?

 

I trust you've been listening to the House of Lords. How refreshing to hear rational, reasoned debate....

I didn't quote you firstly, so do not take it personally. It was a general statement about those claiming democracy but don't want allow an democratically elected President to visit the UK.

Yes I do know the difference in state and official difference more than you know.

How dare  you call me a lover of the conservatives. I have never, ever voted for them. They are in power now and will stay there because the poor and disgraceful state Labour are in and the way Tony Blair and Gordon Brown ensured they were unelectable after there time in downing street. IMHO

As for Trump he is not my man. if I had a choice I would have gone for Ron Paul but I was not a HC fan. He is the president of the USA and it doesn't if you like him or not. I think he has some good points and some bad ones. He certainly is not a traditional politician. Regardless he is the president and the UK will and should do business and keep the relationship with the US that we were used to. Much better than Brussels who dictate and demand.

As for the house of lords, yes I have been watching it. If you mean the likes of Kinnock, Mandelson, Heseltine and Ashdown, then it has been watching 4 'duffers', who are seeing their gold plated pensions, go down the drain.  It also reiterates that the House of Lords, needs reforming quickly.

If the government (any) listened every time to a bunch of lefty, liberals when they didn't like something, then nobody would be allowed to visit. As for democracy they had there little protest and signed an online petition. That is it. People stamping their feet like children because they can't get there own way.

I still see remoaners using the democracy flag when it suits them. Trump was elected democratically. Start dealing with it.

So if this actually happens I guess there will be lots of mobile phones, money, property, cars etc, getting handed in, as I have seen nothing but wealth from the Monks. Some how I doubt this will happen but in principle I agree.

14 minutes ago, fruitman said:

 

Some buddhists are very nice to nature as well, will never hurt an animal (roosterfights) or bring other people in danger (thai roads).

It would seem that this monk is not one of those nice Buddhists you mention.

3 hours ago, webfact said:

The driver has been fined 2,000 baht, ordered to undergo politeness training and has also been handed over to police

Thank you for making me laugh so hard. This has to be the quote of the day. I wonder what the 3 hours politeness training entails. I wish someone could video that.

Once again the Taxis in Bangkok show what many are like. Sadly the Taxi services have gone 'down the pan' over the last 15 years IIMHO. I know there are good ones out there but from experience they are difficult to find. A bit like an honest copper here.

8 hours ago, Thechook said:

Now now, they did ask that we stop talking about them on social media because it is tarnishing their reputation.

I was talking about something else as I know the RTP might be watching and taking names.

Lost for words.

Just how incompetent can you get! If you want the world to look at you and think.... stupid, then this is a great example.

On ‎2‎/‎14‎/‎2017 at 0:48 PM, mrbojangles said:

I live in Saudi and drive a lot of km every week. Believe me, Thailand is a piece of cake and a pleasure to drive, in comparison. For instance, I olearned very quickly to never use indicators here as it let's the other drivers know what you want to do, therefore, when you indicate they purposely put their foot down to cut you off. Your indicator here is your vehicle, if you want to change lanes you just make sure there's a gap and move over. Don't seem to have that problem much when driving in Thailand.

Yes and I lived there too so my point was from experience. I live in Bangkok and what you mention about indicators is poor driving and that is a common theme here in bangkok. You have your opinion and I will stick to mine.

I don't believe anything on social media and also from a Dusit poll.

1 hour ago, ezzra said:

 

In defense of Thai drivers it must be said that I have seen much, much

worse drivers in other parts of the world, inconsiderate,  bullies and often

road rage exhibited on many of those country's roads,

The rule of the thumb is, if you drive calmly, politely and correctly, give way

to others when ever needed, you'll have a happy driving experience too.... 

 Saudi Arabia and Egypt are worse drivers than here in Thailand but as the headline is about good road manners, I believe the countries I mentioned have better manners than Thai drivers. I like the give way to others and calmly but having people sit on your bumper beeping, not signaling so you don't know where they are going, make driving less than pleasurable IMHO. Basically Thais in general when they get behind a wheel, they forget the Thai calmness and goodwill and become demons, who have no regard for anyone else on the road in the front. behind or to either side .

6 minutes ago, KhunSteven said:

I'm just trying weed out the truth in this story.

. Personally I don't or have ever smoked cigarettes or weed but cant see what the whole fuss of it all is. you can kill yourself with alcohol legally so why not be allowed to do as you please. Just my little bit to the argument. I know why drugs will never be legalized. the police forces world wide would have to streamline by at least 50 percent.