Written history covers all the times when women were beaten into acceptance of male leadership (dominance). Men have shown that their egos are too fragile to take feedback from people they consider physically weaker than them. Leadership in today's world is not about physical strength. Do you think that the men who do and historically have beaten their wives into submission are better leaders or just a-holes?
Mental agility, knowledge, application of logic, the ability to listen, openness, respect, knowing boundaries, appropriate humility are some of the traits that leaders require. A female president or PM does not need to wrestle a foreign leader into submission - they have others to do that for them if needed.
NB, I appreciate you stating that djt is not a good leader.