Jump to content

DualSportBiker

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    756
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DualSportBiker

  1. 2 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

    Thailand should expect more ads posted in Chinese here since they have opened their borders and allow anyone in without visa. Similarly, I expect soon we will see Russians trying to do the same. Thailands opening of borders without Visas is opening a can of worms they will not like. 

    There were/are places in Thailand where the political signs put up prior to elections are only in Chinese. It might not be the case now, but I've seen it while riding along border roads up north...

  2. That's the way to do it!

     

    Relax, stay loose, some anticipation is allowed. Holding on tight is the worst thing you can do.

     

    The best pillion I ever had was a 6'8" biker who was almost not there he was so in tune. I've struggled more with smaller lighter loads!

    33 minutes ago, Kinnock said:

    just have one hand lightly resting on the handrail so I can hold it if the rider brakes suddenly, and by relaxing you don't get that 'being thrown around' feeling that makes you hold tighter.

    • Like 1
  3. 2 hours ago, MartinL said:

    So now even "resembling foreigners'  is a potential offence, is it? There seems to be no end of ways they're trying to finger foreigners for Thai crime. Surely, if the thieves definitely were foreigners, it would have been one of the first things used to describe them by the shop staff.

    Hard to fathom how you get here. "Resembling foreigners" is not a crime; stealing is. Thin skin much?

    • Confused 2
    • Sad 1
    • Agree 1
  4. Back when I was fresh and green here, I had a meeting with a bank about network security or something similar. My colleague who had been here a while made an observation I have kept close for constant re-use. "There was only one thing wrong with your logic young man," he said. "It was logical."

     

    The application of logic to derive a way forward will only set you back...

     

    On 1/2/2024 at 10:56 AM, 5davidhen1 said:

    I would strongly argue that one is no more likely to be hit by an errant motorist (if, indeed he/she is) on any form of pedestrian crossing, in any country, than crossing a road in an area not so designated.

    I would further argue that one may actually have a better chance of survival when using such a crosswalk etc.

    Logical reasoning suggests to me that, if a section of road is signed to reflect that pedestrians may be crossing, that there will "probably" be a certain number of motorists who will expect such, and approach said crossing with the appropriate caution. Hence my statement "a better chance of survival."

    That said, where UK road rules dictate that one must stop and give way to any pedestrian who so much as puts one foot on a zebra crossing, it is quite evident that this rule doesn't apply elsewhere.

    To reiterate, I believe that any pedestrian is just as likely to be struck by a motorist wheresoever he/she chooses to cross.

    I will usually choose a designated crossing point if there is one nearby, BUT, I will always look in every direction, prior to --- and during the exercise.

    When I was (trying) to teach my son to how to drive, he would sometimes argue, "He/she shouldn't have done that, I had right of way!" To which I would frequently reply, "Would you like to argue that point from the grave?" 

  5. The very first morning my Thai wife and I were in Singapore she yelled at me for walking onto a zebra crossing while a car was approaching. She was amazed that the driver stopped and did not yell at me for interrupting their drive! We were there for years so needed a full and proper reset when we moved back! 


    Zebra crossings here are target zones! Expect to be unseen or ignored.

  6. I changed from marriage to retirement visa three years ago. It was mildly problematic. I did it myself as the last visa agent I used during covid screwed me over. 
     

    I was accused by the IO of have left my wife and therefore living illegally on a visa obtained through falsifying my application. They demanded to see my wife and talk to her on the spot and threatened me with immediate imprisonment. 
     

    when I called my wife who was on a trip with friends, and the phone was unreachable, they thought they had their catch. Anyhow, they did spike to my wife and kinda regretted it, but they then issued my visa and rescinded offers of uncomfortable stay!

     

    They did explain that there is no path from marriage to retirement visa. The logic of a wife passing away did not suggest that was a mistake. Their position was that a marriage visa is easier for foreigners as the wife will do the work! Doing a retirement visa is work for us foreigners and therefore less attractive. 
     

    Anyhow, my renewal the following year was seamless. 

    • Confused 1
    • Haha 1
  7. 8 hours ago, Pattaya57 said:

    Here is the formal requirements for a non-imm O (item 9)

     

    https://www.immigration.go.th/en?page_id=2537

     

    You can see how Savannakhet has butchered the income clause. It's like they took out the income part and left the rest 😀

     

    It does indeed. Many thanks. I will sleep better as I have the 800K and no pension/overseas income to use in my claim of compliance. Cheers.

    • Like 1
  8. 1 hour ago, bbi1 said:

    Why would you not have to prove you are retired??? There are tons of people in the world over 50 who are not retired and are still wage slaves or running businesses. Sounds fair to ask for proof that someone is in fact retired and not faking it while being wage slaves or running a business. Retirement visas are for people who are legit retired and over the age of 50. If that's not the case, they shouldn't be on that visa and use the appropriate correct visa to visit Thailand. It's called a "retirement visa" for a reason.

    How would any government outside of Thailand know who is working and who is not? I've not lived at home for 32 years - the UK government has no clue what I am up to. How they would provide a government-to-government assurance that I don't work is beyond me.

  9. 19 minutes ago, Pattaya57 said:

    Below is the very latest from the Savannakhet Thai Consulate and it has the requirement for pension letter or proof of retirement as stated by OP

     

    However, I think this may just a translation issue and is only for proof of income method, so if 800k in bank should not be needed as most embassies don't issue these letters anymore

     

    Screenshot_20231209-094030_Chrome.jpg

    I do hope you are right. My worry is that they need something from 'my' embassy which I also do not have and don't have time to get...

×
×
  • Create New...
""