forumuser10

think...is it because you are so incredibly handsome?

I had a blissful happy life before joining TV. But now I fear for the future

Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

lol

The roads in the West are not perfect either, you go and try to fix them yourself, and you will see what happens.

This whitey farang no understand, cannot do like that.

I would say, first off, some countries in the west are more racist than others. And also, some countries in Asia are more racist than others. If we speak about Thailand in general, yes, they are extremely rasist. But we can not blame em, as many of us westerners love to play that game with them. We love to be pointed out as whiteys.

Is it a public holiday on May 4th?

Many Falang/Whiteys never learned how to deal with emotions, therefore they do crazy stuff like this, luckily, the Thais were there to save the poor innocent kid

It is ok to make fun of guys shortcomings, in all social classes, in all situations, despite the fact that many guys are very insecure about the size of their organ. But how come it is totally taboo to joke about girls flat chests, or ugly pussy or whatever? Why do we never see a pictures like the one above, but with a guy smiling or giggling of the girls ugly body?

Btw, average size of erected penis according to the British study, is 13,1 cm, study was conducted on mainly European and middle eastern men.

http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/mar/03/the-results-are-in-study-reveals-average-penis-size

anyone knows about this?

edit: Oops, should be employee in the subject header, not employer

We might need to close the company, or file for bankrupcy.

Is this a complicated process?

I have heard that if firing an employee, severance payment needs to be payed, However, if the company will shut down, as it has no more money, does one still need to pay severance payment for employees?

I have heard it is not needed, but can someone confirm is this is correct?

I am getting more and more tired of these thug taxi drivers. ☆sigh☆

There's no doubt, whatsoever, that all Thai women are attracted to Greeks............especially me.

All the others are here to fill the gap that unfortunately I haven't got enough time to fill up.

I have everything that a woman dreams of.

Loads of money, super hansum, very well equipped and I have a six pack that bring the envy to anybody.

In fact this world is not big enough for me, the word God can describe me more.

Now I'm off on my Ferrari to make some more Thai women delirious.

Sorry, can't help it...................

But wait aren't you Greek?

seems the education system is worse in aus than thailand if the OP is anything to go by...

Education system????look nerd this is reality and im trying to explain what the hell is happening to the world ....

You are a whitey/farang who is frustrated because some Thai girls like Thai guys?

Pfftyou know too little of the subject to comment.

U know nothing about thai people living in australia .

Thats why I ask, tell me then.

seems the education system is worse in aus than thailand if the OP is anything to go by...

Education system????look nerd this is reality and im trying to explain what the hell is happening to the world ....

You are a whitey/farang who is frustrated because some Thai girls like Thai guys?

So, how did you do it. You just connected the time machine to the new iMac and all the applications, files, documents, etc just got installed automatically?

Yes, it was pretty much that simple. Just selected the Time Machine option on the installation screen and it did everything else. I didn't lose anything and all my preferences were the same.

Thanks, I will try that, although, I might have a problem cause I run Lion on my old Mac

I just upgraded to the new Retina 5k iMac 27 yesterday and it is a beauty. Using Time Machine everything on my seven year old iMac 24 was painlessly moved to the new machine and was up and running last night. This screen is absolutely amazing, making everything look brighter, sharper and clearer. I am also pleased with how much faster it is.

Yeah, I bet it must be a pretty good upgrade from an iMac from 2007. Did you just connect the time machine to the new iMac?

Did it not create any problems with system software applications from the time machine from your old iMac to the new iMac system software application

I was already running Yosemite on the old iMac so there were no problems at all with the upgrade using Time Machine.

So, how did you do it. You just connected the time machine to the new iMac and all the applications, files, documents, etc just got installed automatically?

http://www.macrumors.com/2014/07/09/broadwell-early-to-mid-2015/

The Macbook, iMac, and Mac Mini ranges where updated only 1.5 months ago. The next refresh is detailed in the link above, but don't hold your breath as the Broadwell chips have been delayed several times already.

Ok, sounds good, what was the upgrade 1,5 month ago about, was it something of importance?

CPU's updated, more storage options, the iMac5K, and of course Yosemite.

So for example:

The 3,2 Ghz quad core intel core i5, 1 TB hard drive is the upgraded iMac?

The 2,8 Ghz dual core intel i5, 512 GB mac book pro is the upgraded macbook pro?

http://www.macrumors.com/2014/07/09/broadwell-early-to-mid-2015/

The Macbook, iMac, and Mac Mini ranges where updated only 1.5 months ago. The next refresh is detailed in the link above, but don't hold your breath as the Broadwell chips have been delayed several times already.

Ok, sounds good, what was the upgrade 1,5 month ago about, was it something of importance?

I just upgraded to the new Retina 5k iMac 27 yesterday and it is a beauty. Using Time Machine everything on my seven year old iMac 24 was painlessly moved to the new machine and was up and running last night. This screen is absolutely amazing, making everything look brighter, sharper and clearer. I am also pleased with how much faster it is.

Yeah, I bet it must be a pretty good upgrade from an iMac from 2007. Did you just connect the time machine to the new iMac?

Did it not create any problems with system software applications from the time machine from your old iMac to the new iMac system software application

Higher taxi fares won't change the Thai taxi driver.They will continue to demand off meter fares. I would so like to tell them ....

If you don't like driving in traffic .... get another job.

If you don't like foreigners .............get another job.

If you don't want to drive a passenger after midnight ... get another job.

And yes ... it is not my country. It is your country. Your home. And i am your guest.

Could not agree more...

Oh, for goodness sake, just get on with it and increase the sodding fares.

Yeah, the less quality and the more expensive the taxi will be, the better!?

I am in the process of upgrading my computers, was thinking about a new MacBook pro and a new iMac.

Anyone knows if there is a new iMac and Macbook pro soon to be released so I should wait?

Or are the new currently available models the best technology there is for a near future?

Most abusers are not known to be criminals, especially those who are on the margin, whose abuse is mostly verbal violence and not physical violence. Control, manipulation, and gaslighting.

If we are mainly talking about verbal abuse probably 99% of all feminists out there would have to be sent to prison immediately. And after that, at least 50% of all verbal abusers are for sure females attacking men.

It is for example common practice, and totally accepted for wifes to sit around a table and bash males as a gender, meanwhile a similar scenario would never be accepted, where respected guys would sit around a table and bash females. This is by no means accepted practice in the society.

We see the mainstream media, in advertisement etc, it is totally acceptable to mock and bash males as being fat, dirty, lazy, stupid etc, and even make fun of violence against males, for example, attacking and mutilating the male sex organ, something what would be totally not accepted if it was directed towards females.

We are not talking about random violence against women on the street. If we are talking about that, men are about 100 times more likely to be the victim than a woman.

When we talk about violence against women, it is almost always a domestic problem. And in that case women MUST choose a partner that is NOT violent and criminal.

95% of all the guys out there are NOT criminal, nor violent.

Women, take responsibility for your action, choose a good guy, not a criminal dangerous casanova, with major drug problems.

1) Yes, men are the victims of violence from men, but that is a separate issue.

2) No, actually, no it's not, unless you mean that abusers and attackers are often known to the victims. You're right that attacks from the bushes, while they do occur, are a tiny minority. Most abuse and most assaults occur from someone the woman is close to, yes partners, but also family members, friends, co-workers, etc. While I obviously agree women should not choose violent partners, if they do so, this does not justify abuse. See #4.

3) We know all about #notallmen, that isn't the point here. Try #yesallwomen instead.

4) You continue to conflate the action of choosing a bad partner with deserving of abuse. This is victim blaming. Stop it.

Most abusers are not known to be criminals, especially those who are on the margin, whose abuse is mostly verbal violence and not physical violence. Control, manipulation, and gaslighting. They don't have a rap sheet. And if they eventually do lose control and enter into physical violence, there won't be the kind of thuggish background you are trying to claim this about. Toxic masculinity and anger management issues create abusive partners without the sort of "obvious" "criminality" you claim here. Walk around a women's shelter and ask how many of them have men with criminal backgrounds, how many are drug dealers. I suspect you will find more drug users, especially men who struggle with alcohol, but you will also find men with no criminal backgrounds, no substance abuse problems, who appear like the perfect neighbor next door and have good work and outside social relationships--but who become different people with their partners. This is why many women stay; they think it will get better. They think they can change him. They think it's not that bad. You are reinforcing these views by suggesting that all abusive partners are members of the criminal element, and that women who choose partners who abuse are complicit in their abuse.

It's also worth noting that abuse does occur in homosexual relationships as well, although at a much smaller rate than heterosexual relationships. And you know how many of those abusers are part of the criminal element? Very few, and I base that on both personal experience and on research into queer relationships.

tl;dr Your claim that simply avoiding a criminal partner will avoid abuse is bullshit, your claim that having a criminal partner means you deserve the abuse is even worse, and even your claim that violence against women is largely within romantic relationships is a dangerous oversimplification.

I do not say they deserve to be abused. But in your and most of the rest of the western extreme feminism ideology you fail to see the whole picture of cycle of abuse and violence, and focus 100% on male responsibility, always, as this really is a gender issue when it is not. There are a small group of men who are very violent and abuse, not "men" as the whole sex.

There will always be a minor percentage of people who are downright evil and violent (both males and females, in case you did not know). What can we do to minimize the effect of these abusers? As women, you must choose your partners and who you associate more wisely, the same goes for males who wants to minimize the risks of abuse.

The MAJORITY if not all of the domestic violence will be eliminated if women choose not to be involved with the dangerous, "sexy", criminal, alcoholic, and violent males.

Women very much should be responsible for their actions. Indeed, women should be allowed to have agency in the first place which would allow them to be responsible for their actions.

However, it is never acceptable to visit violence or abuse upon someone. Now, if a woman comes up and attacks you, go right ahead, you have the right of self-defense. And hopefully that woman is going to go to jail when the cops finally intervene.

We're not talking about that here. Crimes against women are not caused by women, so women do not need to be responsible for their actions.

We are not talking about random violence against women on the street. If we are talking about that, men are about 100 times more likely to be the victim than a woman.

When we talk about violence against women, it is almost always a domestic problem. And in that case women MUST choose a partner that is NOT violent and criminal.

95% of all the guys out there are NOT criminal, nor violent.

Women, take responsibility for your action, choose a good guy, not a criminal dangerous casanova, with major drug problems.

Yes, because only criminals abuse female partners. *eyeroll* And even it was true, again, you're blaming the victim. Even if you marry a criminal, you don't deserve the abuse. That's the bottom line here. And guess what? Nice Guys turn out to be abusers all the time. If not physically abusive, mentally abusive.

Female needs to be responsible for their actions just as much as males.

When a female choose a <deleted> up macho partner, or an otherwise violent partner, it is her choice. ONLY her choice!

We see this all the time, females portrayed as helpless victims, just like the way we view mentally retarded people, or children.

Regular adult females MUST be responsible for their own actions. It´s about time!