HughJass

the EU should ban the sale of Michelin tyres in europe since they are obviously locating elsewhere

It is "Chosen ones that cant be criticised" {COCBC} that promote multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. COCBC have promoted these movements in the interests of COCBC, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. . While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, COCBC have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others. COCBC have advanced their interests by promoting pluralism and diversity -- but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard their own state, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.
Why is this in the interests of COCBC? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of COCBC attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The COCBC determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years -- even without a country -- has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in nations with well -defined national identities. it is therefore in the interest of COCBC to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. COCBC identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.COCBC are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors {promotion of feminism and gays} COCBC make the diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society's homogeneity so that COCBC will feel safe.COCBC may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the COCBC.They promote to deconstruct the workings of strong nation-states with powerful immigration policies, to deconstruct the rhetoric of nationalism, the politics of place, the metaphysics of native land and native tongue... The idea is to disarm the bombs... of identity that nation-states build to defend themselves against the stranger, against COCBC and immigrants... The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse UK and other white nations is their most effective insurance policy against anti-COCBC.. Third-World immigration, affirmative action, anti-discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in the interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus demonstrating how completely they have abandoned their racial identity. due to years of cultural brainwashing post WW2

In his book Deadlier Than The H-Bomb Wing-Commander Leonard Young states that there are only two reasons for Third World Immigration:
1. To pollute and destroy our race by mongrelization; and
2. To provide degenerate urban mobs which can be used for revolutionary purposes.

He clearly identified the real driving force behind the plan to destroy Britain when he wrote:

“The Banking System which was foisted on this country in 1694 and during succeeding years over most of the world has been the main means by which the...... "the chosen people who are not allowed to be criticised"... have brought misery and impoverishment everywhere. By their manipulation of finance they have been the cause of most wars and economic and social troubles. They have been able to obtain control of governments and of the means of publicity (Press, Radio, TV, Films, Publishing Houses, News Services, etc.) and so have been able to suppress the truth and propagate the lie. This has enabled them to fool and bully the people of the world into following the most suicidal courses until the... "the chosen people who are not allowed to be criticised".... are now in the position of expecting to clamp final dominion upon the world by means of a supranational organisation and some form of irresistible world police force which they would control.”

If you think we don’t have censorship in Britain, try and buy a copy “from any good bookshop” or borrow one from a public library.

more brainwashing of the masses by putting the handful of women and children at the forefront of the photograph while the hundreds of men in their 20s and 30s languish in the background

That's how they control us! By using Emotions! The emotion-center in your brain overwrites rational thinking!

its not so much the effects it has on their body that bothers me, thats their choice

its the content of the programming which includes brainwashing people and surreptitiously moulding their views and opinions

to suit the aims and objectives of the coming New World Order

try googling who owns the the US mainstream media and Hollywood

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." Voltaire

give them their land back you bunch of thieves

EU left-liberal mafia is trying it's best to get rid the one and only French whistle-blower who dares to speak the truth.

leftism: "instead of changing the ideology according real life - just shut those who speak the truth up"

how predictable.

One more time you don t understand sh.t about her or obviously do not know her program, other wise you, as a far liberal defensor, would spit on her program

what I know about her is that she is the one and only who defend her country from Muslim invasion. the one and only in France.

And I support this completely, because I like France and don't want the German fate for it.

Germans deserve to be eliminated by Muslims, but French don't. Let Germans to commit suicide alone.

and after (if) France will be saved from modern barbarity - French people will have a possibility to decide either they like her program or not.

Germans deserve to be eliminated by Muslims

would you care to elaborate on that?

http://www.pigeoncontrolresourcecentre.org/html/reviews/flashing-hawkeye-and-buddha-eyes.html

I have to admit, when I lived in Japan years ago, there was a subculture of really hot Japanese girls who were totally into black guys. And I mean these were smoking hot Japanese girls, unlike the lo-so bargirls in Thailand who are into foreigners. I was jealous.

The same goes on here in Thailand, too. Smoking hot Thai women who prefer (usually AMERICAN) Black guys. I personally know of several professional (non-BG) who really want to get with American Black guys. Especially those who personally know of other Thai women who have married American Black men.

It is not a phenomenon. It's simple, uncomplicated personal preferences. What is laughable is when people (and we all know who those are) think it is unusual.

You basically described many European countries too. Many are drawn to African-Americans.

I think its more to do with the promotion of race mixing in the celebrity media that so obsesses the youth of today...ie its cool to have a black b/f

Kim Kardashian married Kanye West

Khloé Kardashian married Lamar Odom

CoCo Austin and Ice T

Elin Nordegren was married to Tiger Woods

heart arrhythmia,could be intermittent,get an ECG done when you are feeling bad

Please refrain from calling me a troll simply because my version of events differs from yours.

Simply answer this question - how was it possible that David's phone was stolen from his pocket by Wei if, as they claimed, that they "never went anywhere near the crime scene" in fact they didn't even know that a rape and double murder had taken place on the beach that night if I recall rightly!!

Also, don't you think that the fact that they incriminated themselves by admitting that they violated Hannah's body carries a little bit of weight as to their guilt!!

If you can answer these two questions in a convincing manner then you may call me for trolling.

I will ask you again...The B2's DNA was not on the murder weapon....Others were...

Your thoughts.......?

I am starting to believe the B2 know more about this than they are letting on

admitting to "finding" what turns out to be Davids black coloured i phone on a sandy beach in the pitch dark sounds rather fortunate to say the least

losing clothes on the beach after going for a swim?...how far out were they swimming?...who would be around to steal cheap clothes in the middle of the night...its a useful tale if the clothes had blood on them

maybe i have missed something but when was this said?.. "the fact that they incriminated themselves by admitting that they violated Hannah's body"...?

i do not think they acted alone if in fact they were involved which would explain why their DNA was not on the hoe

with regard to the running man is there a possibility it could be their buddy who supposedly left the beach earlier to visit his g/f.....was his alibi fully checked out?

heres an idea why dont the Israelis retreat to the land that they gifted themselves via their control of the UN in 1947 and then i have no doubt that peace will reign in the region

The story is about HUNGARY. It is NOT about Israel.

There are enough threads about Israel for obsessive Israel demonizers to enjoy their endless sport.

here we go again with the stop persecuting jews rhetoric

“any people who has been persecuted for two thousand years must be doing something wrong." Henry Kissinger

just trying to cheer the OP up with a little humour

Sorry thread full.

Konying, if you want to do some fact checking try..

Even the The Jewish Virtual Library claims that as far back as 1800 almost 100 years before the founding of Zionism in 1896 and the waves of Jewish migration that Zionism encouraged,Jews formed a mere 8.7% (24,000) and Palestinians 91.3% (275,000) of the population.

Even after the first waves of Jewish migrations 1890 - 1922, the Jewish population of Palestine was only 11% when the first census was taken, and they owned a mere 3% of the land

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/demograhics.html

More nonsense, no surprise from the same fiction making people, ie YOU

Better take your fact checking problem up with Benjamin Netanyahu who endorsed my source, the The Jewish Virtual Library established by The American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE) established in 1993 as a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization to strengthen the U.S.-Israel relationship by emphasizing the fundamentals of the alliance — the values our nations share.

"There's a depth and richness of this relationship that is expressed every day.... we have an enduring bond of values, interests, beginning with security and the way that we share both information and other things to help the common defense of our common interests..."

-Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/about/index.shtml

Israel can pretty much do what it wants because it owns the US govt and the US media

Prod, prod, prod. Poke and try to get a reaction so as to have an excuse to release deadly force again.

The UN really needs to do something about this rogue aggressive state.

I agree. If they'd stop stabbing Israeli citizens things would go better for them. As it is, the UN should run them back into the desert where they came from.

"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid Galilee of its Arab population."

-- David Ben-Gurion (Founding Father of the State of Israel and First Israeli Prime Minister), from Ben-Gurion, a Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar (May 1948)

could some of the more knowledgeable posters on here explain to me why Hitler and the Nazis hated jews and why did they feel the need to lock them up in concentration camps and allegedly institute a deliberate program of mass extermination?

the reason for the intended prosecution of this old lady and the recent conviction of 93 year old Oscar Groning have nothing to do with locking up people who are approaching the end of their lives and seeing justice done after 70 years....no......Mr Groning who was sentenced to 4 years detention will never serve a day of the sentence because it would be bad for PR

this is all about keeping the holocaust in the public eye

the reasons being

billions in reparations and pensions are paid to jews and Israel each year by the German taxpayer

The US. taxpayer gives Israel 3 billion dollars a year

it garners sympathy with the believers who are the vast majority

it is a scientific fact that people who we feel sorry for are treated much more leniently
it is used as a shield to deflect criticism from Israels actions

the only thing thats going to save these two is if there are DNA rsults from an autopsy done in UK in which sperm was discovered inside the deceased or skin samples under fingernails that do not match the B2

I find it unbelievable that no original sperm sample exists from the swabs taken from inside Hannah....my guess is that the RTP realise that this sample cannot be substituted by an easily obtained saliva or skin sample because forensics can tell the difference so they had to use the excuse it had all been used up to avoid handing it over for independent forensic analysis...also the mysterious disappearance of Hannahs clothes only adds to the obfuscation

if the UK police and the Witheridge family have any DNA samples i would like to see a private eye follow around the original suspects picking up cigarette butts,tissues,coke bottles etc for comparison

The real irony is that there are over 300,000 survivors.

Estimates, I think, cite 200,000 survivors. But why is that ironic? More than a million were murdered there.

until 1990 there was a plaque at Auschwitz stating that 4 million people perished there

no doubt this was based on the confession by torture that the British got from one time commandant of Auschwitz Rudolph

Hoess

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_Faurisson.html

after the fall of the Soviet Union documents were uncovered that proved this number could not be upheld

so now there is a plaque that reads 1 1/2 million perished

the 6 million overall figure remains unchanged

So, what?

so what?

well i would say that because the Soviets controlled Poland where Auschwitz is located from 1945 -1990 it can be reasoned that they deliberately misled the world by claiming that 2.5 million more people {not just jews} perished at Auschwitz...bearing in mind that they had in their possession documents refuting this claim then why would they do that and what was to be gained by doing it ?... also because of the magnitude of this "error" does this mean the world may have been misled over other claims about this period in history?

The real irony is that there are over 300,000 survivors.

Estimates, I think, cite 200,000 survivors. But why is that ironic? More than a million were murdered there.

until 1990 there was a plaque at Auschwitz stating that 4 million people perished there

no doubt this was based on the confession by torture that the British got from one time commandant of Auschwitz Rudolph

Hoess

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_Faurisson.html

after the fall of the Soviet Union documents were uncovered that proved this number could not be upheld

so now there is a plaque that reads 1 1/2 million perished

the 6 million overall figure remains unchanged

buy private from a farang thats had it from new

full service history

has blue book in HIS OWN NAME

go over the body with a fine tooth comb including under the bonnet and in the boot and look for overspray of new paint especially on rubber trim and metal creases that havent been fixed in hidden places...take a torch with you

do doors panels line up...ie the gaps are consistent all the way down between the panels

check that condition of interior including seats and pedals,mats etc look like they correspond to the mileage

take your time as the car market is swamped with used cares and bargain hard

a lot of s/h cars in thai garages are crashed and repaired even at the main dealers like Toyota Sure

look for an expat returning home or upgrading his car on thaivisa classifieds,bahtsold or any other local farang website

only in Thailand

there you go again using Wikipedia as a source. This thread by the way is about Hillary Clinton and what Donald Trump did, not about Zionism, but to your false distinction between being anti-Zionist and antisemitic I can but point you to the words of Martin Luthur King.

According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary...An Encyclopedia Brittanica Company

Definition of SEMITISM
1
a : Semitic character or qualities
b : a characteristic feature of a Semitic language occurring in another language
2
: policy or predisposition favorable to Jews



so antisemitism = policy or predisposition NOT favorable to Jews


So called "antisemitism" is nothing more than pro-Jewish bias which says Jews cannot be criticized for anything.

“When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You’re talking anti-Semitism!” —Martin Luther King, Jr.