Jack Mountain

20 minutes ago, Justgrazing said:

 

No I think the outgoing President should not be using the last mths of his tenure contemplating making decisions that seem to be more about projecting an image that he is still relevant rather than serving America's best interests in the region .. 

Iran cannot match the U S militarily , everyone knows that but Iran has proven in the past to be quite capable of disrupting vessel movement through the Straits of Hormuz including hijacking oil tankers .. that then sends the price of oil up and the markets into jitters which has an effect on everyone .. And does it really look good that the most powerful military in the world is ordered to initiate an unprovoked attack with little or no intelligence of any imminent danger to the U S or its assets to justify it .. 

Intelligence you can buy by the kilo, has never stopped the US or Israel ... or the UK (remember Tony B.).

48 minutes ago, Naturesway said:

I always said your health should be your business only, so don’t spend and waste your money and the people’s money for something <deleted>! 

In cases where it concerns a contageous desease where the virus only can be beaten when a certain percentage of the population got vaccinated.

In that case you can't say it's only your own business and I wouldn't be surprised when too many scary people are refusing a shot that it will be mandatory.

I wished they would have done that when the polio virus was around, too many people (children) died because there parents refused to vaccinate them because of religious reasons.

I want Sputnik V ... Personel note: email Russian embassy or there are opportunities.

27 minutes ago, polpott said:

Is it pathetic to tell the truth? If you are a Trump supporter, probably yes.

No, I am not a fan of Trump or any other POTUS but I have the feeling that he's a man with a plan, but he need that 2nd term to execute it because then he has his hands free. Doesn't happen many times in a century that a man with balls is at the helm ... Biden certainly not ...

38 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Obama, Clinton, Ford, Carter, Roosevelt 

 

Perhaps 41 out of 45 and #46 raises the ratio.

 

 

 

 

Carter maybe ...

$8 a shot, not cheap. How many are needed? Just one or do you need a booster ... at a price.

Any news about the colour of the water?

When was it that there was a POTUS who wasn't Evil?

6 minutes ago, George Aylesham said:

But the press reports don't say he's caught it again - just the fact that he has been in contact with an infected person.

So he could be immune but when in contact with an + one, he could be infectious to other people?

So the registration started at november 11 (this month) is for a maybe discount early next year? Or can you, when the registration is approved, go with the current running first scheme?

2 minutes ago, Andy from Kent said:

 

 

Do you change those very often or only under emergency   circumstances?         

Never change because I don't wear. Saved the last one I used for my Astrology club. ????

6 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

 

OK, thanks,

I had maybe hoped for something better

 

without thinking detailed about such a scenario I would guess that turning

from counting # electors to counting # states has the potential of having a president

with a mandate based on a result further from popular vote than "normal"

 

Looks like it's more complicated.

https://www.thoughtco.com/when-presidential-election-is-a-tie-3322063

5 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

should each of the two candidates end up with 50% of the electors,

 

what would be the formal process to follow in order to end up with a president elect and new president?

 

 

 

Number of States won I believe ...

1 minute ago, natway09 said:

I did not believe the result last time,

Americans are awfully slow learners,

Trump is a danger to the world

A danger to America will be enough. ????

3 minutes ago, Susco said:

 

Considering that Michigan and Pennsylvania still have 20 and 36% of votes to count, and that these were early votes, there could be a surprise  in those 2 states.

 

Mi. 80, Pa 64% you're right.

1 minute ago, dunroaming said:

Watching the screen now showing Biden on 220 and Trump on 213.  Also has popular vote showing Biden at 49.9% against Trump at 48.6% Wouldn't call that green for Trump at the moment.  But I think it all rests and the swing from the postal votes.

Suppose Biden gets Nevada and Pa, Trump the rest ...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2020/nov/03/us-election-2020-live-results-donald-trump-joe-biden-who-won-presidential-republican-democrat

21 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Counts still to finish predict another 77 for Trump and 6 for Biden.

(with 90% of those votes counted)

Counts finished give 213 to Trump and 238 for Biden.

 

Every vote uncounted would have to be for Biden ...... and even then they probably wouldn't change the result.

290 for Trump and 244 for Biden, not even close as Trump wins by 20%.

 

Odd most of the remaining states to be counted are for Trump ....... coincidence?

Total is 538. But ok Trump will have his 2nd term ...

Guns creates the opportunity that people kill people.

Happy I did not lived in a country where it was so easy to get a gun, even legally, because I would have been in jail ...

At the other side having a gun to defend the constitution doesn't sound too bad.

So for world peace I would say "Americans, shoot eachothers head off".