Jump to content

donnacha

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,897
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by donnacha

  1. 4 minutes ago, billd766 said:

    Unless you were there at the time, you have absolutely no way of knowing what happened.


    Yes, that is why I used the qualifying words "probably" and "almost certainly".

    You may not have noticed but any forum discussing News stories contains posts by people who were not "there at the time". The whole purpose of such discussions is to speculate on the underlying causes. It would be a very quiet thread if the only participants were the ones who were there at the time: a Thai nanny and a baby.

    My observation that many unsupervised Thai workers are distracted by their smartphone addiction, and my guess that this may have applied in this tragic case, are both valid.

    • Like 1
  2. 1 minute ago, NanLaew said:

    I was in a Thai-owned business; a very busy branch of Mityon (motorbikes) where the staff were not allowed to access their phones while on-shift. There was an area at the back of the sales department desks where the phones were kept in named pigeonholes and another one in the mechanics area. Maybe your staff just didn't like you?


    As ever, you never miss an opportunity to insult another member.

    Your past experience, in an entirely different type of business, has no bearing on the current state of smartphone addiction among domestic workers in Thailand.

     

  3. The story about the stove is probably nonsense, the nanny was almost certainly engrossed in her phone.

    I once had the wild notion that I could insist that Thai workers leave their phones in a locker while on duty but it has become clear that they will not turn up the next day if they cannot remain permanently attached to their virtual existence. They all say they want a job but this is, apparently, a deal-breaker.

    • Like 2
    • Heart-broken 3
  4. 1 minute ago, simplethings said:

    They actually tried to sell me an elite visa during the interview, which I kindly refused. 


    Wow, they are simply shameless.

    For what it is worth, you are not the only one getting such a shakedown, the noose appears to be tightening for everyone. Between that and the expanding smog season, I don't expect to remain living in Thailand much longer.

     

  5. I agree that the use of the term "blockchain" is mainly a PR move but, actually, product traceability is a pretty good use for some sort of public ledger.

    If the aim is to make it possible to reliably trace each bag back to a specific farm and set of inspection personnel, the use of a publicly accessible UID makes it much harder to slip other rice into the system, and much easier to determine fault when quality issues arise. That strikes me as entirely worthwhile.

    So, what they are probably talking about here is something relatively simple, not actually using blockchain tech at all, and I could see this becoming a standard for almost all Thai products, both agricultural and manufactured. It would appear to be high tech, but would mainly be needed because Thai culture so often lacks an innate sense of responsibility or integrity.

     

    • Like 1
  6. 20 hours ago, Lisztian420 said:

    Is bkk really the strictest?? I wonder is it worth it for me to first fly to chiangmai instead of bkk...


    Absolutely, if you can find any way to do that. From your description of your visit history, Chiang Mai should be about 10x safer, even despite the most recent reports.

    If flying from America or Europe, a good trick is to land in one of the regional hubs outside Thailand, such as KUL, HKG, SIN. Then catch a short, cheap flight on a budget airline to Chiang Mai. Depending on the time of year, you can also fly directly into Chiang Mai from Qatar Airways hub at Doha.

    The side benefit of flying from a regional hub is that, if you are rejected, you are not forced to buy an expensive last-minute long-distance ticket back. You can get a short, cheap flight to KUL or wherever and work out your next move.
     

     

    19 hours ago, sallecc said:

    ChiangMai (and Pattaya?) are less risky, but CM had few reports too, just few.


    The reports are worrying, but the overall attitude in CNX has always been so much better. My guess is that the IOs there are simply more aware of how dependent their region is on tourism, whereas the Bangkok IOs see themselves as the frontline shock troops for a proud new Thailand that would be better off without Westerners. I am hoping the recent scattering of reports from Chiang Mai do not indicate the beginning of the same trend throughout the rest of the country.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. 13 minutes ago, sallecc said:

    If it's cumulative, then I suppose he shouldn't be fine?


    Ah, I was interpreting his sentence "Both my passports show that i haven't stay in the country all that long" as meaning that, cumulatively, he was still under the notional six month maximum, but reading his post again I see that he said "I have been staying in Thailand for the majority of my time in the past 14 months with maybe only 6 weeks away from the country".

    So, yes, you are right, he is likely to have a problem, especially if entering via the Bangkok airports.


     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  8. @Lisztian420 Thanks for creating this thread. My understanding is that, in itself, having two passports is not a problem, a surprising number of people have more than one. Of course, now that they are linked, your cumulative history will be considered, and the usual limits will apply. You mentioned that you have not not been in Thailand all that long on either passport, so, you should be fine.

    Incidentally, some very strange people occasionally try to hijack threads here in a nonsensical way. It is a form of trolling but they are careful not to say anything that will get them banned. I am not quite sure why they do this, I suspect drink or some form of mental trauma may be involved. Don't worry about it, always the same small group of oddballs, ignore them, everyone does, you are under no obligation to respond or get tangled up in an argument with them.

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...