
donnacha
-
Posts
1,897 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by donnacha
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Strange how things change over just a few years.
Apart from the girls, European destinations such as Spain now offer a significantly better overall quality-of-life than Thailand.
If girls are your main thing, it is arguable that Cambodia, Vietnam, and The Philippines are a better overall deal than Thailand.
Just a few years ago, I would never have guessed that Thailand would fall so far from its #1 position.
-
12
-
4 minutes ago, billd766 said:
Unless you were there at the time, you have absolutely no way of knowing what happened.
Yes, that is why I used the qualifying words "probably" and "almost certainly".
You may not have noticed but any forum discussing News stories contains posts by people who were not "there at the time". The whole purpose of such discussions is to speculate on the underlying causes. It would be a very quiet thread if the only participants were the ones who were there at the time: a Thai nanny and a baby.
My observation that many unsupervised Thai workers are distracted by their smartphone addiction, and my guess that this may have applied in this tragic case, are both valid.-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, NanLaew said:
I was in a Thai-owned business; a very busy branch of Mityon (motorbikes) where the staff were not allowed to access their phones while on-shift. There was an area at the back of the sales department desks where the phones were kept in named pigeonholes and another one in the mechanics area. Maybe your staff just didn't like you?
As ever, you never miss an opportunity to insult another member.
Your past experience, in an entirely different type of business, has no bearing on the current state of smartphone addiction among domestic workers in Thailand.
-
The story about the stove is probably nonsense, the nanny was almost certainly engrossed in her phone.
I once had the wild notion that I could insist that Thai workers leave their phones in a locker while on duty but it has become clear that they will not turn up the next day if they cannot remain permanently attached to their virtual existence. They all say they want a job but this is, apparently, a deal-breaker.-
2
-
3
-
-
1 minute ago, simplethings said:
They actually tried to sell me an elite visa during the interview, which I kindly refused.
Wow, they are simply shameless.
For what it is worth, you are not the only one getting such a shakedown, the noose appears to be tightening for everyone. Between that and the expanding smog season, I don't expect to remain living in Thailand much longer.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, simplethings said:I recently applied for a ED visa that is not a typical Thai language course, more leaning in the way of self defense.
So ... you mean a Self-Defense ED Visa, which is not only "not a typical Thai language course" but is, in fact, not a Thai language course at all.
2 hours ago, simplethings said:Upon return to Thailand, I was fully grilled at immigration, after a lengthy chat, test of Thai language skills and various profiling.
Might have been an idea to skip the Thai language skills test by explaining that your visa has nothing to do with that.
I only mention this because, when dealing with IOs, clarity is vital.
-
3
-
1
-
You are probably spending more time thinking about this than the actual flights will take.
Book according to the departure times that are most convenient for you. The main difference is that Nok give you a tiny bottle of water.
-
3 hours ago, DLock said:
Pimchanok is far beyond her level of competence.
Judging by the photo, applying her own make-up may be beyond her level of competence.-
1
-
-
I agree that the use of the term "blockchain" is mainly a PR move but, actually, product traceability is a pretty good use for some sort of public ledger.
If the aim is to make it possible to reliably trace each bag back to a specific farm and set of inspection personnel, the use of a publicly accessible UID makes it much harder to slip other rice into the system, and much easier to determine fault when quality issues arise. That strikes me as entirely worthwhile.
So, what they are probably talking about here is something relatively simple, not actually using blockchain tech at all, and I could see this becoming a standard for almost all Thai products, both agricultural and manufactured. It would appear to be high tech, but would mainly be needed because Thai culture so often lacks an innate sense of responsibility or integrity.
-
1
-
-
On 11/24/2019 at 8:38 AM, IraqRon said:
I have seen chickens beheaded and still run and flap their wings for minutes before dying.
I have observed the same thing with millennials.-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, wgdanson said:
If I was detained at Swampy or Dmk, the last thing I would think would be to get on Thai Visa.
Your TM11 form certainly sounds more effective, I'm going to print one out now ????
-
Using the Bangkok airports is always a gamble. Sometimes worth the risk but a gamble all the same.
I feel bad for all the guys who don't follow Facebook groups or forums like this and are not aware of how much things have changed, even for visa holders.-
1
-
-
20 hours ago, Lisztian420 said:
Is bkk really the strictest?? I wonder is it worth it for me to first fly to chiangmai instead of bkk...
Absolutely, if you can find any way to do that. From your description of your visit history, Chiang Mai should be about 10x safer, even despite the most recent reports.
If flying from America or Europe, a good trick is to land in one of the regional hubs outside Thailand, such as KUL, HKG, SIN. Then catch a short, cheap flight on a budget airline to Chiang Mai. Depending on the time of year, you can also fly directly into Chiang Mai from Qatar Airways hub at Doha.
The side benefit of flying from a regional hub is that, if you are rejected, you are not forced to buy an expensive last-minute long-distance ticket back. You can get a short, cheap flight to KUL or wherever and work out your next move.
19 hours ago, sallecc said:ChiangMai (and Pattaya?) are less risky, but CM had few reports too, just few.
The reports are worrying, but the overall attitude in CNX has always been so much better. My guess is that the IOs there are simply more aware of how dependent their region is on tourism, whereas the Bangkok IOs see themselves as the frontline shock troops for a proud new Thailand that would be better off without Westerners. I am hoping the recent scattering of reports from Chiang Mai do not indicate the beginning of the same trend throughout the rest of the country.
-
1
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, sallecc said:
If it's cumulative, then I suppose he shouldn't be fine?
Ah, I was interpreting his sentence "Both my passports show that i haven't stay in the country all that long" as meaning that, cumulatively, he was still under the notional six month maximum, but reading his post again I see that he said "I have been staying in Thailand for the majority of my time in the past 14 months with maybe only 6 weeks away from the country".
So, yes, you are right, he is likely to have a problem, especially if entering via the Bangkok airports.
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
58 minutes ago, andre47 said:Europeans will loose their importance for the Thai tourism market.
There was always one vital characteristic of Western tourism which actually made us very suited to the Thai way of doing things. Many (but not all) Western tourists would dabble in the nightlife, providing plentiful opportunity for scams and hustles. Conveniently, many of these incidents would never come to light, because the victims generally did not want to have to explain to their friends, families, and work colleagues why they happened to have ladyboy in their hotel room at 4am. In fact, if anything happened to you while in Thailand, the smart play would be to suck up the loss and never talk of it again.
So, while the existence of sex tourism was a terrible embarrassment to the Thais, it actually allowed enterprising locals to shake lots of money out of tourists with no real reputational downside for the country. What happened in Thailand stayed in Thailand.
Now that they are phasing out Western tourism, however, the natural impulse to scam or mistreat visitors is not being so conveniently swept under the rug. Chinese tourists, often traveling in large groups, tend to have more vanilla tastes and, so, when they get ripped off, have nothing to be ashamed of and are quick to share their story on social media. The multiplying effect of that means that even relatively small scams like this one (a few thousand baht from a few hundred people) get massive coverage and start to form a narrative that rapidly removes any remaining shine Thailand had for Chinese visitors. The prediction that ever-growing millions of Chinese would continue to flock to Thailand may turn out to have been a tad premature.
Thailand so badly wants to be a family destination but, sadly, the realities of Thai character mean that it may forever be better suited as a non-family destination.
-
3
-
1
-
Only a fool would walk around wearing valuable jewelry in a third world country or London.
-
@Lisztian420 Thanks for creating this thread. My understanding is that, in itself, having two passports is not a problem, a surprising number of people have more than one. Of course, now that they are linked, your cumulative history will be considered, and the usual limits will apply. You mentioned that you have not not been in Thailand all that long on either passport, so, you should be fine.
Incidentally, some very strange people occasionally try to hijack threads here in a nonsensical way. It is a form of trolling but they are careful not to say anything that will get them banned. I am not quite sure why they do this, I suspect drink or some form of mental trauma may be involved. Don't worry about it, always the same small group of oddballs, ignore them, everyone does, you are under no obligation to respond or get tangled up in an argument with them.-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 11/14/2019 at 9:50 AM, Bill97 said:Or is it alcohol and drugs?
Air pollution has a neurological impact. A series of minor strokes can go unnoticed but cause a significant reduction in cognitive ability. The other impacts of prolonged exposure to high levels of air pollution, including a decline in lung and heart efficiency, can also have a knock-on affect on mental ability.
Some guys who have been in Chiang Mai for many years no longer have enough money to get out during the burning season. Sadly, these are also the guys least likely to have good health insurance.-
6
-
That's strange. I thought the TM 30 would increase the number of budget airline passengers.
I certainly fly around Thailand on weekend breaks a lot more now that it also gives an excuse to spend Mondays at the Immigration office. Always a terrific laugh down there.
-
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, ukrules said:They've been saying that since it was introduced more than 10 years ago.
Sure, but that something did not happen does not mean that there was no risk. When you pay far in advance for anything there is always some risk that circumstances will change over time, and it makes sense to factor that into any buying decisions.
By the way, if you had told people considering the Elite visa ten years ago that they would be a coup within five years, that would have changed the equation for many. Thailand today is not the Thailand that many thought they were buying into. It is also clear that the rate of change is increasing.
Again, if they sold a month-by-month equivalent of the Elite visa for 9 or 10K per month, they would eliminate a major barrier to 99% of potential Elite visa buyers. With the exception of buying cars or homes, very few consumers think 5 years ahead these days.
-
3
-
1 minute ago, LawrenceN said:
So you know him? Name, please.
I provided a link to his arrest report earlier in this thread, that includes his name. The original post here actually links to the Facebook video and discussion which reveals his Facebook account.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, bbi1 said:
lol....care to share the list so we all can contribute to narrowing down who it is?
I presumed it was you!-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:No matter where you go, there are always going to be nut jobs, who refuse to take their meds, and have never been able to, or capable of doing the inner work required to resolve their inner demons. Nobody deserves to be subjected to this kind of abuse. Just deport him, and blacklist him from ever coming back. He is fairly useless as a human being.
What about his two young daughters?
As drunk and crazy as he may have been on this and, reportedly, other occasions, is it fair that they will pay the highest price if you boot him out?
Now, perhaps he is sufficiently crazy to be a danger to them, in which case, okay, they might be better off without him too. To ascertain that, however, he needs to receive some form of care, some form of assessment, possibly even some form of treatment. To say "just" deport him sounds good, but is is not a good match for the complexity of all human beings.
I'm not holding out much hope, but the poor bast*rd might have some good in him too.
-
6
-
2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
34 minutes ago, alex8912 said:I think you are forgetting that most people traveling here from far away places are coming here with at least two 23 kg bags
At least two 23 KG bags?!!
Surely that can't possibly be true. If you think about the people you see collecting their bags from airport carousels, most seem to have just one suitcase, and generally not particularly big ones. Even one 23 KG bag would be quite a lot to bring. Except for Americans, obviously, to enjoy their vacation they need to bring more possessions with them.
34 minutes ago, alex8912 said:The suggestion of buying another round trip ticket from Singapore to Bkk back to Singapore with two 23 kg bags on Air Asia for example ( or another discount airline as you mention ) is quite expensive!
I didn't suggestion a round trip ticket for the budget airline hop. The advantage of those airlines is that there is no cost advantage to buying a roundtrip, so, you have the convenience of booking the return leg later.
Air Asia currently charge $19 for a 25 KG bag from SG to Bangkok. I feel that $40 for two 23 KG bags would not be excessive. Perhaps I am getting this wrong but presumably someone traveling around with such a massive amount of possessions, they had to have money to buy all that stuff, right? Surely $40 each way is peanuts compared to having to buy an emergency ticket back to Europe or Europe.
Just to be clear, I know nothing of this bizarre activity of shuffling around the world with heavy bags. It strikes me as a terrible way to start your vacation. A few clothes, perhaps some gym gear, some shower gel, your laptop, maybe a kindle. Even including presents, why would anyone ever need more than one 20 KG bag? The fact that the international carrier give you the allowance doesn't mean you are obliged to weigh yourself down with all that stuff.34 minutes ago, alex8912 said:the better advise is something I’ve mentioned before is buying a multi city ticket and staying in another city even one night or even a few hours.
Honestly, as someone who flies quite a bit, I cannot image any situation in which a multi-city ticket on an International carrier such as Cathay is going to work out less expensive than what I've suggest.
Is it possible that you might just not like the idea of using budget airlines?
I can sympathize, but if we are talking about a relatively cheap way to deal with a relatively low risk problem, budget airlines are the quick, cheap, flexible way to do it.
34 minutes ago, alex8912 said:As a side note the hype in this forum on this topic is too much. Many posters are THINKING their time spent in Thailand is too much when it actually is not. These people are being hurt by this hype and making stupid travel changes that are both expensive and not necessary. READER BEWARE of the hype!! Please.
Wait, who is this READER guy? And has he been watching us this whole time!
No rational visitor to this forum is going to come away with any unwarranted fears. The threads are fairly balanced. There is a risk for certain categories of people and it is better that those people know, rather than not know, that it is currently a good idea to avoid entering Thailand via the Bangkok airport.
It is good to know what the precautions are. I speak as someone who has lived pretty much full-time in Thailand on back-to-back tourists visas even after things got tougher. That has involved taking exactly the sort of precautions that you dismiss as being "both expensive and not necessary". What I can tell you is that it was less expensive than buying an Elite visa, less stressful than getting rejected on arrival, and less catastrophic to my finances and mental well-being than getting married. My sincere thanks to all of those who shared their experiences, their knowledge, and their "hype" about how the system actually works.
-
3
Bus RTC Rabbit Card Top Off
in Chiang Mai
Posted
No longer available at KSK information counter.