sungod

Came here the first time when I was 19, I just liked older women around 25. 

2 hours ago, Woke to Sounds said:

 

Bullship.

 

In HCMC you just saunter into the traffic and they weave around you like fishes.

 

Easy.

Rubbish, the sheer volume of motorbikes alone makes it more difficult.

On 7/8/2025 at 8:16 AM, Felton Jarvis said:

I would not spend one extra day here if I could live anywhere else. Most of us are here because it's

cost-effective. If I could live in Norway or Denmark for the same money, I would move tomorrow.

Tell me you are 'stuck' here 🙂

13 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Better to move into a commune, take drugs and live off welfare.

Hard work is for suckers (I know, I did it).

 

You are describing Starmer's UK 🙂

3 hours ago, henryford1958 said:

A classic example of why cannabis needs to be banned, totally.

Please explain your rationale (if you have any that is) 

1 hour ago, baansgr said:

Oh, the " non violent" drug strikes again

You really have no idea do you....

double post

2 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

Wow.  Just don't try to cross the street, drive a car or motorbike.

Pretty easy here compared to Viet Nam

3 hours ago, Drumbuie said:

Imagine you're still in your home country. How would you feel about immigrants - whose culture of drink, drugs, casual sex with your female relatives and generally arrogant behaviour you find fairly abhorrent -  getting the same benefits as you? 

What, like the immigrant grooming gangs raping women in the UK you mean? 

7 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

He went to jail for Contempt of Court. And he plead guilty.

He isn't persecuted. 

Of course he's not.....

4 hours ago, Celsius said:

I have a Thai drivers license and pink ID card 💗 

It would be interesting to see how that works, skepticism tells me it will identify you as a foreigner by your number and thus be ineligible. 

3 hours ago, thesetat said:

This is done to ensure NO foreigners can apply and get on the trains for the 20 baht. 

I'll just ask the wife to apply and use her card.

10 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

So you think the CPS just glance at a video clip and make a decision?

They did for Tommy Robinson

5 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Agreed. I concur that older adults, those with comorbidities, and individuals deemed high-risk should follow medical advice and receive COVID vaccines, alongside their seasonal influenza shots.

 

(I’m not looking to reopen the COVID vaccine debate, but it’s worth noting that at the start of the pandemic, when vaccines first became available, there was considerable uncertainty about who exactly was ‘at risk.’ At that time, I was comfortable taking the vaccine as a precaution. However, given my current circumstances, I now feel it unnecessary for myself. Were I over 65 and travelling, though, I would likely choose to receive it.).

 

 

Fair point, I think that its important that people should not be labeled ant vax just because they make their own informed decisions such as you and I and countless others have done. 

3 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Answered above already: Its not necessary for the general population...  So no.

 

But, if I were bitten by an unknown dog or stray cat etc... then of course, I'd get the vaccine.

 

 

So, we'd agree that any 'regular person' who is not affected by something such as covid, is not anti vax? 

But high risk individuals should take the vaccine? 

I'd go with that. 

1 minute ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

There has been a threefold increase in reported rabies cases in cats and dogs compared to last year.

 

Seven rabies-related deaths have occurred so far this year – all of them entirely preventable with prompt medical treatment and the rabies vaccine.

 

Is this just another scare story? Perhaps. But more importantly, it's a timely reminder: if you're bitten by an unknown animal, seek medical attention immediately and get the rabies shot. It could save your life.

 

No doubt someone will try to draw a clumsy comparison between rabies fatalities and road deaths – but that misses the point entirely. The existence of one risk doesn't negate the importance of addressing another.

 

... and as far as dogs are concerned, that means dealing with strays too....

 

 

Have you had Rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis? 

Just now, richard_smith237 said:

 

I'm referring to a handful of folk on this forum who are 100% against ALL vaccines...   any...  and that goes for Measles (MMR), Polio etc...   (so not just a covid vax discussion - which again is separate conversation, but also somewhat based around the hysteria of the anti-vax movement)....

 

And yes, as far as tested and proven vaccines are concerned... if someone is anti-vaccination, be it Rabies, Polio, MMR etc... then I am most definitely not with you, and by very definition, against you (and whoever the 'us' is you refer to).

 

 

Fair enough, I'd go with 100% against all vaccines are anti vax.

Have you had a monkey pox jab, its tried and tested, monkey pox can kill you. 

21 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

Last year there were 230 plus attacks on police offers in the UK. 96% were carried out by white men, usually drunk and disorderly. 

Where are you getting your figures from, those numbers are fantasy. 

On 7/7/2025 at 10:09 AM, KhunLA said:

Feel free to overpay, as what I bought for 5-8 baht / gr,

Judging from that statement and the picture you posted previously, I dont think you have much to worry about.

I reckon you'll be under the 0.2% THC legal limit on your 'weed'  🙂

3 hours ago, 3NUMBAS said:

Proper cod?

Snapper with what looks like frozen chips out the bag

1 hour ago, CharlieH said:

If a guy has had more than 50, is he damaged? or is he a lucky git, 

 

Or hung like a racehorse (guess that would make him a lucky git) and cashed up? 

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

A bit of a false equivalence.

Applying the same logic, dont we have laws to deal with them too? 

47 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

We already have laws in place to prosecute them for their actions. Why do we need to label them terrorists? 

Do you think we should legalise Al Qaeda and Islamic State too? Why label them terrorists?