empireboy

My sincere condolences to the grieving families and friends.

A terribly sad event.

It tragically underscores the lack of education in this country and the price that can be paid as a result.

Used it a few times and it's been cheaper than Suvarnabhumi for flights to Singapore. Certainly a lot more convenient when leaving from Jomtien!

It may be cheaper but more convenient is questionable. There is not much difference in time to Swampy and time to Utapao. If you don't like queues at trafic lights then Swampy is best by far.

Den

My own experience is 40-50 minutes to U-Tapao and 90-120 minutes to Swampy.

Used it a few times and it's been cheaper than Suvarnabhumi for flights to Singapore. Certainly a lot more convenient when leaving from Jomtien!

Sad news. My condolences to friends and family remaining.

In a word... "SECURITY".

Condolences and sympathies to family and friends. Very sad!

My sincere condolences to the families and loved ones of the lost. What a sad sad day!

http://www.nongnit.net/statues/tsyyp002/tsyyp002.jpg

These bare breasted beauties are all over Thailand... What is the real issue here?

In before the "working without a permit" posts start ('cause, you know, technically he is working even if he is doing it voluntarily).

I've wondered about that myself (doing little jobs like that just out of the goodness of my heart) but have been worried about the whole "work permit" thing.

It seems the definition of "work" needs refining to mean "paid work" otherwise all volunteers are in breach of the law... that just isn't sensible

What we KNOW about our world is nothing compared to what there is yet to know.... Great photo... cool looking creature.

Achtung! They'll be banning the speaking of 'German' language next!
Seriously? I invite you and your desperate family and friends in to my home, give you shelter and food and a chance at a life.... and now you want to tell me how to run my family!!?

Does this actually work?

Hmmm.... why do you ask? Is that important!? This is Thailand!

Crack this, crack that... Every week they're gonna crack something, but still nothing's ever been cracked.

The only crack in Thailand is the crack they're on.

If they were serious about it, it wouldn't be necessary to tell the public "we will do something...".

Do it! ... and THEN tell the public what you did.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They're a cracking great bunch these Thai Regulators.

Probably the only thing they are truly "cracking" is the 'Bubbly' to celebrate their wins!

Sad revelation but glad he's now in a position where it won't happen again!

Why is it that only the expensive options are ever hailed and the numerous in-expensive therapies that work get scandalised?

Oh! maybe it's because Big Pharma can't monetise the inexpensive ones!

Can you please share with us what these inexpensive cancer cures are? I am sure at least 30% of the population would be interested.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

I am not a doctor and neither am I making any medical claims.

Anyone who spends time online can make themselves aware of a number of options. But here are a couple I am familiar with.

1. I recall seeing a Ray Martin show in Australia a few years back (Ray is a renown TV Show Host in Oz) where he interviewed a Medical Doctor and former Executive of the Oncology Research Association. The doctor had begun treating patients with a non-invasive, painless, radio-wave based therapy that within a two week period put patients into remission. At the time, cost around AU$2,000 per patient. The results were 100% if I recall correctly.

The average orthodox cancer treatment today costs around $350,000.

2. Go to this website to see another even less expensive option: [/size]

http://www.cancertutor.com/simoncini/

Hope this helps!

Seriously anyone who disparages the results of a clinical trial that is based on methods and discoveries made by different research labs around the world, each working on a small consecutive step that leads to improvements which are then adopted by other labs, and each step of which has been announced and discussed at research conferences every year going back to 2005, and before, and published as dozens of individual research papers since then, so that all the steps can be traced and validated, and instead believes a man who went on a TV talk show and says he can 100% cure cancer with radio waves, must have something seriously wrong with their cognitive ability!

I assume you also unilaterally include in your "slap!" the TV channel and, Ray Martin and, their team of lawyers that would have reviewed potential liabilities and other issues with a fine-tooth-comb before they considered airing such a show?

Is it possible you should get your own cognitive tubes cleaned out? Maybe the bias is with you? Just asking...

Please also note, I am not promoting an either-or approach, but an inclusive one. Mine was a question not an arrogant assertion!

To be clear... I say it's great that ANYBODY is working against cancer!

But just follow the money trail and you see so often that Big Business bullies the rest irrespective of how genuine their effects may be! How can that be good for the war on cancer!?

BTW, the particular show I saw, the Cancer Research Council executive WERE invited to research the claims scientifically and independently... they refused!

Hmmm... I smell a rat! Don't you find that bigoted and very UN-SCIENTIFIC approach just smells bad!?

Go Donald!

Yeah you're brash, and playing your own game, but hell, you have a surprised the idiots of Washington, the media, and just about everyone else.

If a guy like Obama was smart enough to get elected and screw up so much ever since, why can't someone do it in reverse?

You might be a wild-card, but jokers win games!

Why is it that only the expensive options are ever hailed and the numerous in-expensive therapies that work get scandalised?

Oh! maybe it's because Big Pharma can't monetise the inexpensive ones!

Can you please share with us what these inexpensive cancer cures are? I am sure at least 30% of the population would be interested.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

I am not a doctor and neither am I making any medical claims.

Anyone who spends time online can make themselves aware of a number of options. But here are a couple I am familiar with.

1. I recall seeing a Ray Martin show in Australia a few years back (Ray is a renown TV Show Host in Oz) where he interviewed a Medical Doctor and former Executive of the Oncology Research Association. The doctor had begun treating patients with a non-invasive, painless, radio-wave based therapy that within a two week period put patients into remission. At the time, cost around AU$2,000 per patient. The results were 100% if I recall correctly.

The average orthodox cancer treatment today costs around $350,000.

2. Go to this website to see another even less expensive option: http://www.cancertutor.com/simoncini/

Hope this helps!

Justice and the Law... never the twain shall meet!

Why is it that only the expensive options are ever hailed and the numerous in-expensive therapies that work get scandalised?

Oh! maybe it's because Big Pharma can't monetise the inexpensive ones!

Can you please share with us what these inexpensive cancer cures are? I am sure at least 30% of the population would be interested.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

I am not a doctor and neither am I making any medical claims.

Anyone who spends time online can make themselves aware of a number of options. But here are a couple I am familiar with.

1. I recall seeing a Ray Martin show in Australia a few years back (Ray is a renown TV Show Host in Oz) where he interviewed a Medical Doctor and former Executive of the Oncology Research Association. The doctor had begun treating patients with a non-invasive, painless, radio-wave based therapy that within a two week period put patients into remission. At the time, cost around AU$2,000 per patient. The results were 100% if I recall correctly.

The average orthodox cancer treatment today costs around $350,000.

2. Go to this website to see another even less expensive option: [/size]

http://www.cancertutor.com/simoncini/

Hope this helps!

Seriously anyone who disparages the results of a clinical trial that is based on methods and discoveries made by different research labs around the world, each working on a small consecutive step that leads to improvements which are then adopted by other labs, and each step of which has been announced and discussed at research conferences every year going back to 2005, and before, and published as dozens of individual research papers since then, so that all the steps can be traced and validated, and instead believes a man who went on a TV talk show and says he can 100% cure cancer with radio waves, must have something seriously wrong with their cognitive ability!

Yes CLEARLY you are an authority and, I am the fool you assert me to be.

Thank you for bringing to the attention of the world!

You should go far!

I hope soon!

Why is it that only the expensive options are ever hailed and the numerous in-expensive therapies that work get scandalised?

Oh! maybe it's because Big Pharma can't monetise the inexpensive ones!

Can you please share with us what these inexpensive cancer cures are? I am sure at least 30% of the population would be interested.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

I am not a doctor and neither am I making any medical claims.

Anyone who spends time online can make themselves aware of a number of options. But here are a couple I am familiar with.

1. I recall seeing a Ray Martin show in Australia a few years back (Ray is a renown TV Show Host in Oz) where he interviewed a Medical Doctor and former Executive of the Oncology Research Association. The doctor had begun treating patients with a non-invasive, painless, radio-wave based therapy that within a two week period put patients into remission. At the time, cost around AU$2,000 per patient. The results were 100% if I recall correctly.

The average orthodox cancer treatment today costs around $350,000.

2. Go to this website to see another even less expensive option: http://www.cancertutor.com/simoncini/

Hope this helps!

Why is it that only the expensive options are ever hailed and the numerous in-expensive therapies that work get scandalised?

Oh! maybe it's because Big Pharma can't monetise the inexpensive ones!

Ummm Geez! ... btw, the sun will be going down today and coming up again tomorrow. That's right folks. Don't forget, you heard the 'Breaking News' right here!

Maniacal dictator!

Had a frontal lobotomy?

Sad news and my condolences to the entire family. Most especially the children who have lost their mother.

I hope that the truth becomes obvious and justice be done!