- Popular Post
-
Posts
6,486 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Dogmatix
-
-
26 minutes ago, Dogmatix said:
I have rental income from the UK which I rarely remit the Thailand and pay tax in the UK. They have a system and a form for non-resident landlords to file. You do accounts deducting expenses including agents fees, repairs and renovations and pay tax on your profit. Some years I have had to do a big renovation and declared a loss. No problem with UK taxman who has never audited or even asked for receipts or documentation in decades.How will this work under Thai global tax? When I do my Thai tax return, I will have file for tax in the UK for 1 Jan to 5 April of the Thai tax year I am filing for but not for 6 April to 31 Dec. So I clalm tax credit for 1Jan to 5 April and pay full Thai tax for the rest of the year. But I will also have paid advance UK tax based on an estimate which can later be adjusted, Do they ignore that? Next year do I then claim a tax credit for what I paid in Thailand? Does Thailand allow deduction for repairs and renovation? If so, what documentation would they ask for?
Sounds like a horror no incoming our way without looking at how they will treat other overseas investments. But one thing we know is that they don’t allow deductions for losses. So those already paying tax on capital gains less capital losses will likely have more to pay in Thailand.
None of this has been thought through in this pkan to just shake the foreign money tree until it dies. Not saying they have no right to tax bit it would be better if they spent a couple of years studying the implications and then came up with detailed plans which would probably mean a complete overhaul rather than just applying Thai tax rules to overseas income and not caring about the complexities or unintended consequences.
I think this answers some of my questions on rental income https://www.hlbthai.com/thai-rental-properties-and-personal-income-tax-2/Thailand allows a flat 30% deduction on rental income. If you want to claim more for extensive renovations, tough luck. You will have to submit audited accounts and they might not accept it anyway and unlikely to let you carry losses forward, as in the UK. The out of synch tax years and tax credits under DTA still a problem.
Also a big problem that individuals as landlords have to submit a half year PMD 94 tax return with estimate FY income as well as PND 90 and pay tax twice yearly.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
16 minutes ago, MeePeeMai said:For example,
The 35% Thai tax which would be due on my long term capital gains (vs the 15% I already pay to the IRS) is unacceptable to me (overtaxed).
I did a ROTH conversion in 2024 in the amount of $79,000 which will be taxed by uncle Sam in the 22% tax bracket... that would mean that I would have to pay another 13% in Thai tax (if the tax treaty was applied or 35% if it was not properly applied).
I have rental income (on my house) of $48,600 per year in the USA which would be taxed at 35% here (unacceptable).
I don't even pay anywhere close to 35% tax on my short term gains in the USA now but that income would be taxed at 35% here (or I would have to pay the difference if the tax treaty was applied).
Overtaxed here or not?
I have rental income from the UK which I rarely remit the Thailand and pay tax in the UK. They have a system and a form for non-resident landlords to file. You do accounts deducting expenses including agents fees, repairs and renovations and pay tax on your profit. Some years I have had to do a big renovation and declared a loss. No problem with UK taxman who has never audited or even asked for receipts or documentation in decades.How will this work under Thai global tax? When I do my Thai tax return, I will have file for tax in the UK for 1 Jan to 5 April of the Thai tax year I am filing for but not for 6 April to 31 Dec. So I clalm tax credit for 1Jan to 5 April and pay full Thai tax for the rest of the year. But I will also have paid advance UK tax based on an estimate which can later be adjusted, Do they ignore that? Next year do I then claim a tax credit for what I paid in Thailand? Does Thailand allow deduction for repairs and renovation? If so, what documentation would they ask for?
Sounds like a horror no incoming our way without looking at how they will treat other overseas investments. But one thing we know is that they don’t allow deductions for losses. So those already paying tax on capital gains less capital losses will likely have more to pay in Thailand.
None of this has been thought through in this pkan to just shake the foreign money tree until it dies. Not saying they have no right to tax bit it would be better if they spent a couple of years studying the implications and then came up with detailed plans which would probably mean a complete overhaul rather than just applying Thai tax rules to overseas income and not caring about the complexities or unintended consequences.
- 2
- 2
- 4
-
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, freeworld said:No the tax rates are for everyone. It depends on the level of income of the tax payer.
Not completely true, if you compare income from investment. Capital gains tax on Thai stocks is zero, on dividends it's 10% flat rate and on property sales it is a transactional tax that is generally fairly low and doesn't get lumped in with your income. Tax on investment gains and income on all foreign assets is up to 35% and lumped into your overall income.
- 1
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Legal weed cuts into the money made on meth by gangsters including police, politicians and military.
- 2
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Good. Fit enough to go to jail on his LM charge. He is an obvious flight risk and should not be given bail.
- 1
- 4
- 1
- 1
- 3
- 5
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
In a recent poll asking Thais who they would like as PM, Srettha was trailing at 8%. Pita was top with 46%. Prayut 3rd with 17% and Thaksin's daughter just above Srettha. Anutin was I think just below him. Thais didn't elect this clown and it is pretty clear that the vast majority don't want him or Thaksin's daughter as PM. So there will be few tears, if the court decides to bin him.
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, Gknrd said:It doesn't matter at This point. All you guys will pay. Until you can't!
Everything leading up to this has been so successful, and profitable for the Thai Government it will keep snowballing now.
No more than a joke at this point. And you expats are a huge cash cow for the Thai government. Every one know this will be the last scheme hatched..
Hahaha.
Sad but true. The initial statements about targeting Thai investors were nonsense. They are going after everyone they can, even someone ordering a box of paper clips from China for 25 baht. Whatever they can get from foreigners is easy pickings because the foreigners have no votes and they don't care, if they stay or go, as long as they pay now.
- 5
- 1
-
11 hours ago, RandolphGB said:
The amusing thing about the Siamese people is that they simply never learn from the past and evolve. Thaksin has been kicked out by the military twice already and here he is for a third time, having won back power but facing the same fate because he didn't foresee them going for him. Their whole history is that of faux democracy followed by insurrections from the military-monarchal complex.
But this time the Shins grabbed power after losing the election and Srettha is extremely unpopular and seen as ineffectual as PM. So hardly likely to be a genuine backlash, if the court dumps a PM that wasn't elected and most people dislike. Although it wasn't his own idea, appointing to the cabinet Thaksin's bagman former lawyer was clearly unethical and he deserves to be binned.
Nonetheless I doubt the court will get rid of him as the people who appointed the judges have no alternative to the Thaksin camp.
- 1
-
5 hours ago, Thaindrew said:
credit card and ATM transactions all are part of CRS reporting unfortunately
I have seen people say that but one of my banks overseas confirmed it was not the case. They only report year end balances and income/inflows into the account during the year. Of course the RD can request more information from the overseas tax authority but I think they would need to have a good reason and wouldn't do it lightly. In future the scope of CRS reporting will probably broaden out and may include this data.
- 1
-
10 minutes ago, Sheryl said:
Rats!!!!
That means unless there is some revision to forms enabling me to state my non-assessable income, I am sure to be called in, and it will be a huge headache to say the least. Not a soul there speaks a word of English, all but very high level people have never heard of a foreigner retiring in Thailand (there are very, very, very few such in the province) and believe it is not possible/ no applicable visa category. None have any idea what US Social Security is, and I would be amazed if any will know anything about DTAs.
If I have to hire an accountant familiar with DTAs to accompany me it will be very costly -- they would have to come from Bangkok or Pattaya (6 hour roundtrip in both cases).
rats, rats, rats...
They are unlikely to come up with a form to allow you to show non-assessable income. You might be able to get an accountant or lawyer to write a covering letter for you to take on to explain your situation. Or at lower cost you could draft a letter yourself and have someone translate it and sign it yourself enclosing copies of the National Police Order authorizing your type of visa. Then just take it along every year with the new date on it. Companies make written submissions to explain complex tax issues. So no reason why they should accept the same from individuals and, if they don't come up with new forms, that will be the only way.
-
35 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:
There's good news and bad news. No, wait......it's all bad.
Assume the first sentence is now incorrect, as the remittance system goes away.
The second sentence is a killer. If you sell stocks or mutual funds for a $50K gain, and you offset this with a $50K loss to lower your US tax bill, you'll still be liable for tax on $50K assessable income in Thailand.
This will add another couple thousand dollars to my annual Thai tax bill!
Amazing!
Not being able to offset capital losses against gains is going to be real killer and is really unfair. Thai companies are allowed to do it and carry losses over. There are hardly any domestic assets that you have to file capital gains for, so it is not an issue for domestic investors. Examples would be shares in unlisted companies, bonds, precious metals and collectables but most Thais don't trade these or don't declare them. So it the lack of offset is not an issue enough for people to complain about it. It won't apply to wealthy Thais as they will use offshore corporate structures and only pay Thai tax on dividends as their offshore companies are not Thai tax residents.
- 2
-
2 hours ago, Sheryl said:
@jonclark do you (or anyone else with experience filing Thai tax returns) happen to know if by filing online one bypasses the local (provincial) RD ofgice?
Having previously spent 2 days arguing with mine about whether such a thing as a retirement visa/extension existed I would very much like to avoid any future dealings.
I suspect that office will still review your tax return. I file online in Bangkok and it is reviewed by the tax office up the road from my house. They have never asked to see me for PIT but just send a list of documents they want me to send them. They have only requested docs to do with income or deductions, never personal documents though. If you have an online account they probably assume that personal docs were uploaded to open the account.
-
16 hours ago, webfact said:
The British suspect, who accidentally dropped a firearm in front of the venue, triggered a security alert that led to police intervention. On police arrival, he and his associates fled but were later captured. This British individual had a lengthy criminal record and past imprisonment in the UK for various offences.
Bit of a snaffu a farang dropping a firearm in front of a night club. Hardly likely to able say. Whoops. Sorry guys. I do have a carry permit. Here it is.
Why does Thailand issue visas to people with lengthy criminal records or are they all overstayers on transit visas? They talk about wanting to get rid of foreign mafia types but seem happy to issue them more than tourist and transit visas in many cases. Why not insist on home country criminal record like Thais have to produce to get longer stay visas to farang countries?
- 1
-
10 minutes ago, Sheryl said:
There have been reports that they are revising the forms and with specific mention of adding fields for tax credits.
I have seen people saying that but I haven't seen a direct quotation from a Revenue Department official confirming that. Actually they should have done that decades ago when the first DTAs were signed. Now there is only just over 6 months to go before the 2024 tax returns will be issued and people start filing with them. So let's hope they get them out in time.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
8 hours ago, lordgrinz said:Well, until they state what is acceptable proof of savings, it would be better not to send anything. I don't believe in the, just ignore it until they come looking approach.
I am also very concerned about proof on anything they might ask for from overseas. The kind of documents that RD staff are used to in Thailand, such as certified bank statements, certified tax receipts proper contract notes are often simply not available from overseas. The RD official in the Swiss embassy video make clear that they would requesting exactly that sort of stuff.
The way it works when you file a tax return is different from in developed countries where it is a genuine honours system and you can file for a lifetime without ever being asked for a document or audited. The Thai RD request documentation for every item you declare some weeks or months after you file, unless they have it already in the form of e-receipt for example. Claiming tax credits for Thai dividends involves sending them an original hard copy of every single dividend certificate, even though you can give permission for the data to be fed directly to the RD from the TSD registry which is the registrar for 90% of Thai listed companies. For income from employment you have to send an original copy of your 50 bis document, even though that is filed directly with the RD by your employer.
You don't need a good imagination to see how this mentality could be applied to things like capital gains from overseas (certified original copies of buying and selling contract notes) or foreign tax credits (an original tax receipt certified and stamped by the tax authority).
- 8
-
- Popular Post
7 hours ago, Presnock said:Multimillionaires? I think there are a lot fewer than you and the rest of the AN think. I only have a US govt pension so the taxes that could be avoided via the LTR are a moot point anyway because of the DTA with the US. If the Thais decided to wipe out all the treaties that have been
worked out between Thailand and those 60 or 61 other countries, they by international law have to advise those countries in advance that they
wish to do this. Then if they followed through they would have a difficult time getting any treaty signed with a foreign country for anything unless of course they follow this route and join BRICS in the fall. The LTR on last count hardly has enough expats to help the revenue dept meet their goals anyway. Any mulitmillionaires on an LTR would just cease to be a tax resident here or elsewherever they wanted. In the long run, any changes that are made to the tax laws against expats will IMHO cause a decrease in the funds collected by the Revenue Department as it will probably already show a drop from 2024.
I am with you but the problem seems to be that the people in power seem to have an extremely arrogant attitude to expats. They only care about the super wealthy and even then they are preparing to blow up the LTR tax exemption because it only applies to remitted income which will be irrelevant under global taxation. For other expats, including those with Thai families, they couldn't care less is they drive them out or not. It is obvious that a lot of inflows to Thailand will be choked off, particularly due to the idiotic approach of introducing a remittance tax as a short term measure before going for the jugular with global tax. A lot of damage will be done by the remittance tax because it strikes directly at capital inflows - duh. And huge confusion and uncertainty is created by having two confliction foreign income tax systems introduced one after the other with no preparation in terms of regulations, training for staff or appropriate forms.
It's all about generating more top line to please Tony and get promoted to positions with greater opportunities for corruption. To hell with the cost of generating the incremental revenue or the overall loss to the fixed capital formation caused by choking off capital inflows. You see this power group talking about "quick wins". This is what they win. Stuff that can be spun to make it look like a win but it's actually a loss. So sad for Thai people to get stuck with this type of government that they didn't elect.
- 1
- 5
-
6 hours ago, Sheryl said:
A breeze only if you pay no taxes in your home country and all your income (or, for current tax year, income earned in, or remitted to, Thailand) is assessable.
The current forms will have to be revised to include way to claim credit for foreign taxes paid.
And then there is the very much unresolved question of whether and how to show foreign sourced income that is non-assessable under terms of a DTA.
I would not at all count on RD staff, especially upcountry, to be familiar with these issues.
But will they revise the forms? There have been DTAs with Thailand for 50 years and a small number of individual taxpayers have been claiming tax credits for decades without any space on the forms, presumably by having to draft a letter to the RD or have a tax lawyer do that. We half way through the year and no sign of these new forms and any official comment confirming they are working on them. It is quite possible they will just say, "If it ain't broke, why fix it?"
- 1
-
2 hours ago, sandyf said:
Well aware of the process. Poster I respondedd to said it was in effect "now".
This refers to the imposition of VAT on small postal packages. The Thai press was reporting on 4 June that the cabinet had just approved the wording for the announcement and it would be announced in the Royal Gazette and become effective 15 days later. So far it doesn't appear to have been announced in the Royal Gazette yet.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, ChaiyaTH said:Why they don't address the elephant in the room anyway. There is only like 20 families who get 80% of all the money in the first place, they clearly are not paying enough, so go get it from them and the issue would be resolved while leaving us alone.
Last year they said that the reinterpretation was aimed at Thais investing overseas, not expats. That means small and medium sized Thai investors who use international accounts at Thai brokers to invest overseas and are low hanging fruit. Of course they cannot get the super wealthy Thais because they keep their offshore wealth in tax efficient family office corporate structures in countries that don't tax things like capital gains from offshore. That means that under Thai global taxation they will only have to pay tax on capital gains on stocks, if they want to pay out dividends to themselves. Otherwise they can trade freely generating untaxable capital gains and let their wealth accumulate further. Smaller Thai investors overseas will have to pay Thai tax on capital gains in the year the arise whether they remit or not.
Recognising that they will not get much from wealthy Thais, I think this has now morphed into a plan to get tax from anywhere they can, including collecting another 7,000 baht from Joe Bloggs' already taxed pension in Nakhorn Nowhere. Given their keenness to collect 7 baht VAT on 100 baht packages sent from China, it doesn't seem that there is any concern about collecting revenue costing more than the revenue raised. They are only going to judge themselves on top line revenues, not net revenues after costs which is pathetic.
- 1
- 12
-
On 6/5/2024 at 5:00 PM, snoop1130 said:
Aat Pisanwanich, an independent analyst on international trade, warns that unless more measures are put in place to support Thai entrepreneurs, they may disappear altogether within the next five years.
That's funny. Do they think that more and more protectionist measures will make people want to buy from uncompetitive Thai businesses? Accept reality.
-
This anti-weed sentiment is all contrived to support the order given by capo di tutti capi aka Tony to make weed illegal. No public consultation needed. No issue that it destroys businesses, jobs and tax revenue and that it is going against the global trend to legalise. Tony wants this and he will get it or he will throw the teddy out of the pram. This minister was installed kicking out his more reasonable predecessor purely to get this done. Then he can be binned too.
If genuine public debate were allowed without a predetermined conclusion and they still came to this decision, then fair enough.
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
41 minutes ago, Presnock said:Applied already in March 2024 - takes 5-7 years before approved or not - google Thailand applies OECD
Not sure of the relevance of your comment. Thailand is already in CRS. I believe they are contemplating applying to join OECD at this stage. I guess they are far from meeting the requirements and can’t see what benefits would accrue to an economy stuck in the middle income trap with no obvious route out - GDP growing well below the rate of developed countries and regional neighbors, a hopeless public education system despite massive budgets, years of incompetent economic management, massive corruption at all levels and a flawed democracy with a tendency to military coups that can ignore the result of general elections and appoint convicted felons to the cabinet and allow one to control it from behind the scenes while still on probation.- 2
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, geisha said:What about foreigners that buy a condo but stay under the 180 days a year ? Will he still pay tax on the property bought , and how much ? Then , if that person wants to sell and take his money elsewhere, what then ? ( ps does not concern me I have nothing in Thailand and under 180 days stay.) Also , if this goes through then the whole immigration process will be changing.
There are transactional taxes for buying and selling property, regardless of the buyer or seller’s tax residence. It depends on appraisal value and how long the seller has owned the property. Generally around 3.5-5% of the appraisal price payable at the time of transfer at the land office. An individual seller doesn’t need to include in his tax return but corporate sellers do. Non-tax residents have no tax to pay on remitting the funds in to pay for the condo under current or future rules but a tax resident might have to under the current rule. If you rent it out, a non-tax resident or tax resident both pay Thai tax on the rental income which has to be done twice a year for rental income because that is considered a business done in personal name.Tax liability in this case or not, I guess the condo market is already taking a hit from the current rule, although developers are not complaining yet. Expats already tax resident but currently renting can’t be rushing to remit their savings to buy condos under the threat of a letter from the RD asking them to clarify the tax assessability of the remittance perhaps several years after the event. Retirees looking for a spot to retire may think twice about a place that was a tax haven for expats with no tax on offshore income since taxation started suddenly introducing a remittance tax and then announcing they will do global taxation 5 months after that. That is not to mention the introduction of LTR visas with tax exemption for remitted income with great fanfare. Then folk who have submitted all the detailed personal information to apply and paid the steep fees find that less than a year into their 10 year visas the government will blow up the tax exemption on remittances and tax all their offshore income whether it is remitted or not. That is not to mention the chaos of introducing the first rule precipitously without producing any clarification in the complex applications of 61 different DTAs and with no way to claim tax credits on tax return forms. They give the impression of being angry, xenophobic 5 year olds suddenly put in charge of the country’s tax system pulling this lever and that in quick succession to see if they can make foreign cash tumble out on to the ground like playing a one armed bandit and hoping for a quick jackpot.
- 2
- 3
- 2
-
On 6/5/2024 at 3:39 PM, snoop1130 said:
The Revenue Department of Thailand will amend a law to tax individuals with foreign income, even if that income is not brought into Thailand.
Director-General of the Revenue Department, Kulaya Tantitemit stated that the current tax law mandates individuals residing in Thailand for over 180 days per year to pay taxes on foreign income if it is brought into the country.
This income is currently subject to personal income tax payments to the department. The department is now working to amend the law based on the principle of worldwide income.
This principle taxes individuals based on their residency within the country, irrespective of whether the income is sourced domestically or internationally.
Kulaya mentioned plans to expand the tax base by requiring platforms with an income of 1 billion baht or more to report their sources of income.
She added that the department will use this information to verify their tax compliance.
Previously, the department revised the criteria for tax residency, mandating that individuals residing in Thailand for at least 180 days per year and earning foreign income must pay personal income tax if that income is brought into the country within the same year it was earned.
However, this rule will be revised again, effective from 2024, requiring tax payment on foreign income regardless of when it is brought into the country, reported Bangkok Post.
By Ryan Turner
Image courtesy of Thailand Elite Visas
The Post article didn’t say it would be effective from 2024, as stated here. It didn’t give a start date.- 2
Thailand to tax residents’ foreign income irrespective of remittance
in Thailand News
Posted · Edited by Dogmatix
They could bypass parliament with a Royal Decree but that is risky, as parliament could overturn it later with consequences for whoever approved it.Major changes like the inheritance tax have been acts of parliament, while minor things like tax exemption for LTR visas have been Royal Decrees.
They said they are confident of getting the Top Up Tax bill for multi nationals enacted through Parliament in time to go into effect by 2025 which has just been approved by cabinet. But the BOI is arguing it needs more time. This one still needs to drafted and be approved by cabinet, then pass Council of State scrutiny before going through 3 readings inparliament and then go to the Senate. The readings are sonetimed made close together, if uncontroversial and Urgent with few amendments called for but that is unusual and there is often competing legislation. So being in effect for 2025, though technically possible, would be a tall order needing all stops pulled out and no opposition in parliament. 2026 is more feasible, if the government lasts. Since this is pushed by the RD not a political party, it probably won’t go away unfortunately.