rabas

Yep, watched again, and again he did not say what you initially quoted from the SLAY article. I,e., "He explains in the interview that his surgery is flooded with patients who have been led to believe they have “Lond Covid.” However, he notes that the vast majority of those patients are actually suffering from an injury caused by the Covid mRNA" So if you come across where he says that let me know. You may think changing facts a little is OK. In real science it's a cardinal sin. As I said, I agree with everything Redfield did say. Also that it came from a lab, I've known since Jan 16, 2020. Your SLAY article: https://slaynews.com/news/ex-cdc-director-long-covid-mrna-vaccine-injury/

That' like what my wife said! When it starts to rain, pollution like PM 2.5 is washed out of the air along with viruses that may be present, she said. Studies in China have shone heavily polluted air can carry respiratory viruses. The other part is that getting cold and wet in the wind and rain can weaken your immune system. Particularly if it chills your nasal passage. Colds like, well, cold! They replicate better at 33C than 37C. No wonder they call it a cold.

Thailand's respiratory season, including influenza, aligns with the rainy season also because Thai are predominantly outdoors people but spend more time indoors when it rains. Not sure they fully understand though. Yesterday my wife and I walked 20 meters to a convenience store in a very light drizzle (you could count the drops on one hand) but she insisted we go back up 20 floors to get an umbrella. Asked why she said she might get a cold.

"He explains in the interview that his surgery is flooded with patients who have been led to believe they have “Lond Covid.” However, he notes that the vast majority of those patients are actually suffering from an injury caused by the Covid mRNA" Can you point me to the interview where he says this? I can't find it. The one minute sound clip in the SLAY article says something different including "... not saying the mRNA vaccines are not safe, lets just have an objective review... ". BTW, I like Redford a lot. His objectivity is well beyond many of our posters here...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_jet_engine "Years later, it was admitted by von Ohain in his biography that this was so (he was aware of Whittle's patent). Author Margaret Conner states ″Ohain's patent attorney happened upon a Whittle patent in the years that the von Ohain patents were being formulated". Von Ohain himself is quoted as saying "We felt that it looked like a patent of an idea" "We thought that it was not seriously being worked on." As Ohain's patent was not filed until 1935, this admission clearly shows that he had read Whittle's patent and had even critiqued it in some detail prior to filing his own patent and some 2 years before his own engine ran." But it's always like that. And, how can two crazies who spend their time trying to invent the same thing not become friends?

But all is mute, from your link! Jet engines can be dated back to the invention of the aeolipile around 150 BC. This device used steam power directed through two nozzles so as to cause a sphere to spin rapidly on its axis. Which is impressive as far as ideas go.

Well, the jet engine was actually invented and patented in England by Frank Whittle in 1930. The Germans later came up with the same idea in the mid 1930s and developed it rapidly going into WW2.

It's correct to say China's high-end jet engine industry is still well behind the rest of the world. There are many kinds of jet engines, ones used in commercial aircraft are called high bypass turbo fans. According to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_aircraft_engines] (bottom box) China has few if any finished products currently in use. Whereas the West has been making these engines for decades. Many of China's early jet engines used for fighters were derived from Soviet technology or licensed. Commercial high bypass turbo fans are a big technology, materials, and manufacturing challenge because they must be powerful, very efficient, very quiet, and extremely reliable. If the next generation engine is 10% more efficient, the last generation is no longer useful.

If Bill Gates invented COVID19, it wouldn't work. You would never hear of it. A bug full of bugs. Every infection would crash.

2023 0.27 2024 0.98 (global influenza A surge) But the 0.27 person was cremated at low power.

Like the only time an aircraft's wheels are not braked or locked, and it's being towed? When the aircraft carrier is like this?

You choice of the words 'given back' says it all.

This is not a "belief". This is the reality of the world. Just as the USA gets to determine how other sovereign nations conduct themselves, witness Panama being invaded when they sold secrets to Cuba, if those sovereign nations are in the US sphere of influence, so does Russia get to determine how other sovereign nations conduct themselves, if they are in the Russian sphere of inluence. And Ukraine conducted herself abominably, jumped into bed with hansum man America and then did a gangbang with Europe on top, when its boyfriend Russia was paying her energy bills. Cheating is an ugly betrayal, and Ukraine now pays the price. No. This is neither belief nor reality. It is a choice. One the West and free world must make. History, especially that of Russia and Vladimir Putin, has recorded the peril of allowing Putin to drag the world back to the gory glory days of slaughtering cultures and territorial conquest. Not viable with nukes. How does the West have the ability to chose? Because of NATO's 50 trillion GDP combined with other freedom loving countries. Putin is peanuts.

Sorry, didn't watch the whole video, It's not a legitimate interview. A: How do you know? B: Because we killed 13,000 Hamas terrorists. A: How do you know how many? B: Because we counted them. A: How do you know they were terrorists? B: Because they were shooting at us. A: So, you have no proof. (turns off video) Honesty, did you not watch the video before posting? ... and do you have proof?

See above. Russia has officially confirmed that their denials were, as always, as predictable, as shown by evidence, just propaganda, again.