rabas

I just received mine 25 minutes ago. I was a little bit concerned, mostly due to their 7126 indiscretions.

I had wondered what the white stuff in the trucks was. Concrete for the shaft caps!.

Amazing! So the trucks were bringing in hard concrete to cover the shafts. Here is the full MOP presentation staring at 6.00m with more project background. In the design stage it employed so many PhDs that the MOP project was the largest consumer of super computing resources in the US.

You again ignore how much. Would 400kg of 60% U235 under 80+ meters of limestone be detectable outside, notwithstanding it's not a health hazard inside. My 30 meters or less than half way was based on calculation. But moving on, I would love to understand your concern about the well being of Iran's bomb plans. Is it that you would like to see the worst ever sponsor of state terrorism get one soon? Or the opposite, you are concerned that they do and hope they are stopped?. An interesting question for a poll.

How much, the forgotten question. Most of the radiation is alpha particles that barely penetrate anything. So how much gamma ray radiation reaches the surface through 80 meters of limestone? Even ignoring shielding already used in the facility so that people work in safely. I wait your calculations. My guess is nothing detectable beyond 30m.

Doesn't indicate much. Uranium is not very radioactive, otherwise it would not survive billions of years since it was created in some far away neutron star collision. I used to have a quarter pound on my desk for years. Bury some uranium under a mountain and see what you get. Significant uranium contamination above ground would only confirm total obliteration.

"... severe, wide-ranging, and deep damage, setting it back by years." rough translation, you would probably need to scrape the former centrifuges off the walls.

Here's an assessment. Not a news story about a leak about a classified assessment that no one has seen because it is still classified. Also see www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-858987

I've worked with Iranians for many years at fairly high levels. Their lies will never be so simple. They are masters at the art. Here is more on the Foreign minister's comments. Long, click to read in full.

16 minutes ago. Now being widely reported. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson said the country’s nuclear installations were ‘badly damaged’ by US airstrikes, the Associated Press reported, though he didn’t provide further detail. AP, ABC news, Times of Israel, Bloomberg, Yahoo ... https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-25/iran-says-nuclear-sites-badly-damaged-by-us-ap-reports

Without enrichment facilities, 60% Uranium is useless. You can't make it explode and it has absolutely no peaceful applications. Not even a paperweight, it's lighter than natural Uranium.

It's easier to track them at night. Military satellites can detect truck heat signatures even the heat from your tires. Satellite radar is very good for moving objects. Did the driver turn off his radio and hand phone? That to. Did he call anyone for instructions? I would assume they know where the enriched uranium is. Not to mention the Mossad driver.

I haven't seen a 14 page report. The eastward attack force flight path is shown on the poster in the link. The diversionary flight over the pacific would take ~36 hours because they circumvented the globe. There not many countries to fly over in the pacific.

Not in the Pentagon brief. The whole world including OSINT, watched six B-2 bombers take off from Missouri and lumber across the Pacific, past Hawaii, past Guam towards a rumored attack on Iran. Bombs so heavy they had to refuel right after takeoff. All fake.

Yes, they can put more than one bomb in one hole. It's an old trick, they do it with smaller weapons to penetrate steel reinforced concrete aircraft shelters. As for working, swarms of US fighters are violating all of Iran's airspace night and day, even though Iran has been designing missiles for decades and have top Russian anti aircraft technology. That should tell you how well US designed technology works. Not to mention that Russia has lost much of its weapons export market after their poor performance in the Ukraine war. But there is an easier option to bunker busters, change the regime. That's what the majority of Iranian's want.