Jump to content

JamieM

Member
  • Posts

    322
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JamieM

  1. It is I know the guy and not only him but the guy that started this topic is also banned.
  2. @Kerryd@misterjames (the poster that first pointed the HK connection out in this post) was permanently banned without breaking any rules for posting some factual articles about China, if it is really the case that there is no connection as some are claiming then why is this happening? No doubt I will also be punished for mentioning this but sometimes the truth must be told. Source: https://thethaiger.com/talk/topic/1823-refugee-from-thaivisa/page/16/#comments
  3. I take it that you are unable to clarify the nonsensical post you just made then? ALL the vaccines in use are foreign in Thailand.
  4. You say "foreign manufacturers" in your post, can you tell me what you mean by foreign? As far as I'm aware Thailand doesn't have a domestic vaccine. Can you explain to me which domestic vaccine (that doesn't require advanced payment) you are talking about? as no domestic vaccine exists.
  5. Don't expect an to answer that or any other serious question these guys never answer any questions, just create them.
  6. Seeing as they are buying the subs from China one can only assume that they think the west is a threat. A threat to what exactly who knows what they are thinking? Doesn't make sense to me either.
  7. They probably have installed a remote killswitch (just in case) but lets be real they wouldn't even let Thailand buy them if they weren't already deeply in their pockets. These people may have more money but they have the same mentality as a bar girl they will go with anyone and play them both off against each other. Aid from the west is accepted whilst simultaneously playing footsie with China. Subs are just a like gucci handbags for these guys. The mentality is the same.
  8. Exactly a win win for China all while the Thai people struggle to eat and find an effective vaccine. There is no use case scenario for these subs unless they will be used as underwater lapdogs for China.
  9. My post merely states the actual factual results of the study, no more no less. You can't add or remove anything from that. I'm just pointing out the misinformation being spread on here by other users with the actual factual evidence and figures. Everything else you say, has nothing to do with anything I have said.
  10. Not really sure what you are quoting me for as your reply literally has nothing to do with anything I have said in my post or any of the claims made by me or the person I was replying to? confused.
  11. More absolute nonsense. You pro sinovac guys aren't very good with numbers or facts are you? 1. How are you going to vaccinate billions of people in a country with a population of 70 million? (stay on topic we are talking about Thailand on this thread) 2. You state it does not do good to point out limitations as more likely than they actually are (which I am not doing) so what you seem to be suggesting here is that we ignore the misinformation you guys are spreading about efficacy of the vaccine? (my post was a reply to someone quoting a WHO study saying it was 92% effective which is simply not true) I pointed out the actual results of the study yet you are not happy about it? (that's because you don't like the truth) Source of the results in question: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/immunization/sage/2021/april/5_sage29apr2021_critical-evidence_sinovac.pdf I am certainly not pointing out limitations as more than they are, actually I am pointing out what the limitations actually are (factually) so stop twisting the narrative. As long as you guys keep posting lies and misinformation, people like me will always be here to point out your lies. Remember that.
  12. No, no I won't...thanks! You came on here posting silly figures saying things like "it's proven 92%" etc etc then then when someone shows you the actual study figures you're misleading us about, you get upset? What is that all about? why do you care so much? why take it so personally? are you on commission?
  13. nonsense not even for the original variant let alone the delta variant.. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/immunization/sage/2021/april/5_sage29apr2021_critical-evidence_sinovac.pdf
  14. Anyone else noticed that this post (after the rebrand and concern about the Hong Kong connection) is eerily quiet and completely missing of the usual defensive posts from pro ccp, pro sinovac trolls? none of them! not one have has risen to the bait of this post? What is going on? I can't help but notice that this post seems very quiet for a post of this type they are not even leaving confused and sad faces on every post like usual. What is going on? Have they been told to hold back for a while so it's not so blatant?
  15. They didn't seem to want them to begin with did they? we can speculate as to why perhaps pressure and or brown envelopes from Beijing? as the academics are suggesting, coupled with the health ministers obvious distaste for foreigners, who knows? but one things for sure, they really didn't seem to want to sign up for COVAX to start with. Thailand defends decision not to join COVAX vaccine alliance: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-thailand-idUSKBN2AE0CZ
×
×
  • Create New...