Harveyg

So true. But don’t we all speak with the voice of experience? How many times were you taken for a fool?

I’m sure you can see who is of good faith here and who is not, who has been brainwashed by one-sided media and who has not.

I do not view CNN as reliable. They’re in the news business to make money and so are their sponsors. Let’s be clear about that. I’ll give you one example. Anderson Cooper’s show is produced by Pfizer. His salary is 12 million per year and 10 million of that is paid by Pfizer. The potential conflict of interest is quite apparent. in the case of the Arab-Israeli conflict I cannot cite particular potential conflicts of interest except to say they’re in business, period. Their business demands creating as much drama as possible. What a good way to do that is to solicit evidence and comments only from one side. How much time was the Israeli side given? That is simply not reliable journalism nor what is objective. As for “People of good faith regardless of their views on the Israeli Palestinian conflict will want the truth to come out, and any guilty parties to be punished.” - I agree with you, however I do not regard conclusions based on one-sided arguments as being a person of good faith, yet many respondents are quite ready and willing to pronounce a guilty sentence. regarding charges of antisemitism, my comment was that this sort of one-sided coverage creates the atmosphere of demonizing one group. If they wanted to be fair they could’ve been. They chose not to be fair. Examine the videos and examine who talks and examine who is interviewed. It is let’s say at least 95% one way. It’s not even close to 50%. The only comment attributed to the Israeli side that I recall is that they referred to some of the accusations as lies. Nothing else do I recall. Not even 10 seconds worth of time. Does the journalist state what questions were asked to whom on the Israili side that received no response? Apparently not. What efforts were made to establish the reason the soldiers were there?

Objective reports. You link to one from CNN. Is anyone interviewed from the Israeli side? Anyone? Does the title of the article suggest objectivity? This is how antisemitism breeds. Get both sides before you remotely call it objective. Where are the videos showing the cause and nature and reason for the military presence? all evidence presented is only presented by one side. Thank you CNN.

Yes more screening. Of the WHO, WEC, CDC, NIH, DOD, Phizer, Mo..........

Just to clarify. Did the person reference a doctor recommended protocol for both prophylaxis and early treatment?

Do you by chance know how many shots he has received?

It's not when really. It's the reliability of the investigation.

There's alot on the line here. Everywhere. It's not the Thai doctors that need to be singled out here.

Another thing to consider is what another poster alluded to, namely, the possible long term effects of vaccine. Are there any? Do a google search such as "Autoimmune disease following 1, 2, or 3 covid vaccines." Or, "Autoimmune disease following covid vaccination in South Korea." Or whatever you like. It seems there are some questions. There are also two 8-9 episode docuseries presently available that inform this whole situation that you may find interesting and/or helpful.

True enough. But he is trusting the science when he also follows the money.

The 72 hr timeframe: take the test within 72 hrs or get issued the result within 72hr. Must be the former which seems a bit of stress attaching it w the Thai pass on time?

See PM

Speaking of media, there is a doc you series (nine episodes) playing now that addresses the last two years in terms of various aspects of health, including topics referenced by people here. Other contexts besides health are also discussed. If you’re interested I’m happy to share.

The money wins again. Who are the biggest richest entities on this planet?

My sentiments exactly.

I’m assuming this question is rhetorical and is meant as a joke. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

It is only useful to me when I make more and more connections. The less I know the more blissful my ignorance.

Originally my comments were directed to the person I wrote them to.. Your comment does not invite me to any dialogue with you. Wish you well.

I was wondering where this recent report came from. After all, you may not always wish to wait for large scale research. Actually, now that I think of it, the vaccine rollout didn’t wait for large scale research either. Does anyone know what report they refer to? Then another poster noted that: so I decided to check out S Korea. I put the following in the search bar: “s korea auto immune diseases following vaccinations” The very first entry is to JKMS, Journal of Korean Medical Science from two days ago. The title of the article is: “Auto immunity following vaccination for SARS-Cov-2 in Korea: Coincidence or Autoimmunity? Not a lot to go on, but read a bit of what I could understand from the abstract and results. Noted. In my Google search, immediately following the first Korean reference, were two references to research that talked about this issue of autoimmunity following vaccination but not about Korea. Haven’t read through those much yet. At this point I’d like to know what hospital doctors are seeing on a day-to-day basis to get more information.

The young man has good energy and the song fits him. However, I’m not sure how many years he can keep this up. You can see the veins in his throat popping out. He’s trashing his voice. And you can hear the hoarseness clearly near the end.

Imagine you’re a politician or a government official. You choose to use the word “donate“ to describe this transaction. I wonder what is meant by donate. Language is everything.

The initial non o visa is for 90 days, after which the extension is sought and a reason given. I don’t have to give the reason for the initial 90 days. Am I correct in any of this? Furthermore if I already have an extension based on retirement then getting a work approval letter can be a problem because the timing isn’t right? So if I time the approval letter to coincide with the end of the extension does that have a better chance of success?

I'm planning on a non-o based on retirement at some point in near future. I may have some opportunity for work. If I get a non-o, then get work, is there a category that keeps me in the non-o or must i change to non-b? Thanks

“5 other second-year students and 37 first-year students have had their behavioural scores cut by ten points for allegedly supporting the illegal activity.” Fits right in with China’s social score. Or closing down access to your bank acct. ????