bomber

27 minutes ago, billd766 said:

For bombers information (because he does not understand researching your subject) look here.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/south-american-trade-bloc-signs-historic-trade-deal-eu-190628173859729.html

 

The European Union and South American bloc Mercosur have agreed to the draft of a free-trade treaty, both sides confirmed on Friday, ending almost 20 years of negotiations.

The two blocs began negotiating in 2000. They intensified efforts to reach an accord after United States President Donald Trump's election victory prompted the European Union to freeze talks with the US and look for other global trading allies.

 

That took me less than a minute to find on Google.

keep searching you might even find big bizzness that is looking forward to brexit,or a crackpot that expects sterling to rise with a no deal.

1 hour ago, bomber said:

these brexiteers dont get it,they seem to think the UK will be holding all the Ace's,the Mauratainains are not that stupid.

19 minutes ago, billd766 said:

For bombers information (because he does not understand researching your subject) look here.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/south-american-trade-bloc-signs-historic-trade-deal-eu-190628173859729.html

 

The European Union and South American bloc Mercosur have agreed to the draft of a free-trade treaty, both sides confirmed on Friday, ending almost 20 years of negotiations.

The two blocs began negotiating in 2000. They intensified efforts to reach an accord after United States President Donald Trump's election victory prompted the European Union to freeze talks with the US and look for other global trading allies.

 

That took me less than a minute to find on Google.

i read somewhere it had taken 10 years,it seems the report was incorrect,but thanks anyway you have made my point even more stronger,these deals are doing to be anything but a piece of cake,thank you again for confirming it.

17 minutes ago, nontabury said:

 

And it was of course a Democratic decision taken by the people, something remainers are not happy to accept.

the 16 million who voted accept it,MPs are the ones that dont,the people you want to hand more power to are flexing their muscles and ignoring your wishes,to me you should despise them more than anything in Brussells or Berlin but i doubt you do,yet you still have this warped vision of the UK becoming great again after brexit,it not going to happen iam afraid to tell you

36 minutes ago, Becker said:

Since they have you over a barrel due to your insignificance standing alone compared to being part of a mega powerful trading block like the EU it's going to be real quick and painful, you're right about that.

these brexiteers dont get it,they seem to think the UK will be holding all the Ace's,the Mauratainains are that stupid.

6 minutes ago, tebee said:

Strange that Brexit is going to be so good that so many businesses will need to be compensated for it 

 

Yes, I know this is a satiric account, but it's basically what both leadership candidates are now saying ...   

 

 

the UK is in for serious tax rises or an even bigger deficit,take ya pick but its going to be nasty and thats without the inflation that will come with brexit,pleased i wont be there to enjoy it ????  iam sure the brexiteers on here will keep me updated.

On 6/21/2019 at 2:57 PM, BritManToo said:

How long can the remainers keep dragging the pound down? ........... October 31st seems like as good a date as any.

it seems us remainers might yet get it down to 35 ????  Bojo/farage/corbyn/no deal will then get it down to 29-31 now you enjoy it.

3 minutes ago, vogie said:

You just don't get it.

get what mr leave voter

2 minutes ago, sanemax said:

Although that doesnt mean that the UK making trade deals will take ten years , trade deals will be done much quicker

or even longer or not at all or even worse some bad deals,oh but i forgot these nations are tripping over themselves to rescue/take advantage of a cast adrift desperate nation.as many neutrals have already stated we have the best deal already.

1 minute ago, vogie said:

Somebody needs to sit you down and tell you that it is not acceptable to call other members "thick". And then come back with a "grow up" in reply.

the term brexiteer isnt aimed at any individual poster on here,it a collective term for 17 million,similar to turkeys,i prefer to to call an individual a leave voter.

4 minutes ago, nauseus said:

I read it was more like 20. That shows how thick the EU is. 

bait post reported????

1 hour ago, Andrew65 said:

Rightly or wrongly immigration is a hot-topic in the West. It's probably at the root of what caused many of the 17+ million people to vote for Brexit. As I posted earlier, Africa's population is set to triple in the next 30 years to 2.XX billion people, add to that a Schengen/borderless EU, and eastern European countries that basically don't want non-white immigration.

Britain will accept them,their laws on asylum seekers differ to the rest of the EU,despite what farage and tommy and many on here tell us,i watched a TV show recently about these immigrants/asylum seekers and UK barristers were finding barmy UK laws to win 70-80% of the asylum seekers cases,we were told it was all the EUs fault ???? and 17 million believed it ????

i wonder if he offers kim a phenomenal trade deal,very generous is Donald 

can the pound hold 38? ????

2 hours ago, stephenterry said:

For the past 44 years, the UK has relied upon the European Union, formerly the European Economic Community, to negotiate trade deals. As an EU member, Britain cannot strike its own trade deals, but the bloc has successfully secured 36 trade agreements for its member-states, spanning more than 60 countries. It is unclear whether Britain can continue to participate in these deals once it leaves the EU.

the trade deal the EU signed with south america last week took TEN YEARS to complete,yet brexiteers say its will be a piece of cake,and they moan when we call them thick.

29 minutes ago, RickBradford said:

This is exactly the kind of opaque, meaningless, undemocratic process the UK is trying to get away from.

 

Only a handful of people care a fig about who ends up running this organisation, and they are already members of the top end of the organisation itself.

is that the same undemocratic process where a party could get 32% of the vote yet a party who gets 25% governs?

1 hour ago, malagateddy said:

My choice is Dom Rabb

Sent from my SM-G7102 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Dont you mean Rabb C

5 minutes ago, aright said:

Of course you haven't. as John says through the Agricultural Fund their quality incomes are maintained with no incentive to be more efficient.

You may however see poor farmers in Portugal and Spain if we leave without a deal. Fruit and vegetables are available from, and we already buy from, the African nations and the South American countries, and they are likely to come in duty free in the future.

Who are Spain and Portugal going to sell vegetables to if they don't sell to us and who are France and Spain going to sell their mountain of wine to if we decide to buy exclusively from S Africa, Australia and South America?

There are markets out there are there waiting to buy these large volumes are there?

 

 

 

back to the they need us more than we need them rant,and all because of a apple and orange and a cabbage,another sterling crash and those will luxury items and too expensive for benefit scrounging brexiteers

2 hours ago, vogie said:

I think it would be fair to say that anyone with a leftist persuasion would say that Channel 4 and the BBC are not biased, when they are embarrassingly biased.

if boris had turned up it would of been 3 from each side,

3 hours ago, evadgib said:

Sky's press preview pointed out this morning that Raab took some flack in the absence of the only other Brexit candidate and let's not forget just how biased last nights hosts (Ch4 news) have been since the referendum.

surely even more reason for Boris to show up then.  says something when the his tutors dont want him to even open his gob in fear of him making a balls of it.

4 hours ago, jesimps said:

I think the only thing you'll hear from Brexiteers on here is the desire for parliament to do the democratic thing and carry out the wishes of the people ie the ones who won the referendum. You see, that's why democracy was installed in most countries in the world in the first place. You'll never get all the people to agree all the time, therefore a system called democracy was instituted, where everyone had a vote and whoever got the most votes was the winner. Of course, for this system to work, the losers must accept that they lost, which has been the case until recent times. Now, here and in the US, the remainers and the left no longer seem to want to accept this. This is a very dangerous situation because democracy only works providing the losing sides are willing to concede defeat. When they don't, like at present, it could lead to a complete breakdown of democracy. One thing I think is certain, if Brexit doesn't happen, I for one and I'm sure many others will lose complete faith in the British system of voting. A system, which until recently, has been a template for the rest of the world.

is that the same system where a winning party can can get 35% of all votes counted and beat a party that gets 40% or more.a think the template is broke pal

5 hours ago, vogie said:

I can understand remainers not liking Boris, afteral he is one of the PM contenders most likely to honour the democratic referendum and get us out of the EU. The entire Tory party is reliant on Boris to save them from extinction, maybe he is the only one to do it, who knows.

Putting another remainer in charge, like Hunt or Stewart will surely finish the Tories off completely.

or the next leader could revoke A50 and bag 16 million plus voters for the next GE

5 hours ago, sotsira said:

If Boris becomes PM I think he will end up becoming the shortest

reigning PM in history with the way he conducts himself, it's just

a matter of time. 

not a certainty he will even get the job,100000+ tory voters who decide not the MPs,makes little difference as he will be turkied before xmas

22 hours ago, jonwilly said:

The only thing the EU ever wanted from Britain was money.

Money to finance their dream of a Socialist Europe and keep Germany from France's throat.

They never wanted British Culture or Legal system, mind you the Brit Military would have been a welcome aid for them.

Just money.

Germany and France organized the system so they could claim back large amounts from the Agricultural fund for their inefficient farmers, while UK's farmers could never claim such large amounts.

Maggie got her refund on the basis of the Common Agricultural Policy and the Blur gave half of it away on the understanding that France would reform it's farming, of course they never did or will do.

May made a bad deal. she should have told them hat under their Rules/law they were entitled to nothing and if UK was to kindly offer money then it would be on the understanding they the EU did all it could to assist a Clean break and withdraw.

 

john

 

iam yet to meet a poor farmer.