MadAtMatrix

It’s at 117%. You’ve got bad sources

And the funny part about the poll, it was held inside the Democrat Party Headquarters

Here is someone that made a video, actually going to the DLT Rayong and asking the questions. The gist of it. 5 year renewals available for Non O, Non B, Elite, LTR, etc (visas that are issued for one year, it doesn’t matter about the time remaining on it) 2 year renewal available for tourist visa, DTV, anyone with less than one year permission of stay. Example you were here, got a licence and you went home. Now you come back and you have a METV, and you renew your licence, you get two years again, because you don’t have a 365 day stay stamp. They don’t move you up to a five year because you are not “living” here. watch the video, this will alleviate your panic.

Yes, you can get secured cards with KBank. You can also get an unsecured AMEX if you hold an AMEX in good standing in your home country. The credit limit will be based on your income and what visa you are on.

Did the face scan last week. I just went into the app and changed my limit. Put in 5,000,000 and scanned my face and it was fine.

Headed to YouTube now, I’m going to watch all the Scientologists talk about what new amazing medicines they are going to come up with to save us from these reckless doctors that might give me medicine that will make me start neighing and feeding me bags of carrots after the horse pills they give me

im glad you went to all that effort to get all of those things. I took several hours out of my day to thoroughly examine these links and now you have changed my point of view. This man is a menace, and he should be hung from the gallows in the streets. I can’t imagine how many people died from his reckless interventions. I will make sure he is on my list of “doctors to never go to”. His name will be alongside Dr Jack Kevorkian and Joseph Goebbels. You are the best. Gratefully, MadAtMatrix

Did he lose his medical licence? So those board certifications mean “if you step out of line and don’t agree with exactly what we say and do, you can’t be in our club anymore”. Sounds more like a mafia than anything.

Did he lose his medical licence? So those board certifications mean “if you step out of line and don’t agree with exactly what we say and do, you can’t be in our club anymore”. Sounds more like a mafia than anything.

You are making the claims, you bring the proof. I can’t be arsed to go read Wikipedia. You are quick to cite “Fox News” as lying to people, yet you believe Wikipedia to be unbiased and the absolute truth. Your factual evaluation are “facts” that suit your own opinions. Next you are going to tell me “science is settled” and the statement of “I am science” by Fauci is accepted by every scientist on the planet.

Once again, you rely on wikipedia. Bring court documents that have convicted him of fraud that you allege, and I will read it. Until then, wikipedia is a crowd sourced "encyclopedia" that holds zero credibility. The ball is in your court mr prosecutor.

Here you go, Richard Cranium. With sources. Now get back to your finger painting Wikipedia exhibits a **mild to moderate left-wing bias** in its English-language content, according to recent studies. A 2024 Manhattan Institute analysis found that Wikipedia articles tend to associate right-of-center public figures with more negative sentiment and left-of-center figures with more positive emotions like joy[1][2][3]. This bias appears in articles on recent U.S. presidents, senators, Supreme Court justices, and Western prime ministers, among others[1][3]. Earlier research also showed Wikipedia articles on U.S. politics leaned pro-Democratic by favoring terms associated with Democrats over Republicans[1][2]. Wikipedia’s arbitration and enforcement processes have demonstrated institutional favoritism toward left-of-center views as well[1][2]. However, some research and reports suggest that this political bias is not uniform, with certain topics or groups showing no bias or even slight bias against the left[1][2]. Wikipedia’s content overall, however, is often found comparable in neutrality and accuracy to traditional encyclopedias like Britannica[1][4]. Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has publicly stated he believes Wikipedia has a significant left-leaning ideological bias, especially as it has moved away from strict neutrality[1][3]. Media and commentators have noted that this leftward bias in Wikipedia can influence large AI models trained on its content, spreading the bias further[3]. In summary, expert analyses and researcher consensus indicate that Wikipedia’s content shows a **left-wing bias**, especially in political topics related to U.S. and Western politics, although it is described as moderate rather than extreme[1][3][4]. Sources [1] Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? - Manhattan Institute https://manhattan.institute/article/is-wikipedia-politically-biased [2] [PDF] Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? | Manhattan Institute https://media4.manhattan-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/is-wikipedia-politically-biased.pdf [3] The Myth of Wikipedia's Neutrality: Unmasking its Leftist Bias https://stophindudvesha.org/the-myth-of-wikipedias-neutrality-unmasking-its-leftist-bias/ [4] Ideological bias on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia [5] Do you think Wikipedia is biased? : r/AskALiberal - Reddit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8Px93Q6-XY https://www.reddit.com/r/AskALiberal/comments/r9gafi/do_you_think_wikipedia_is_biased/

Wikipedia. The bastion of truth. Run by left wing basement dwellers that wear masks alone in their positive pressure rooms that don’t see the light of day. while they aren’t “creating” articles, they are faeces finger painting their shower walls.

Go into the settings of your web browser and search for DNS. Change it IN the browser (no need to do on the router) to cloudflare 1.1.1.1 and everything will become unblocked. Even CornPub works this way without needing a VPN.

Only if they were “woke” and would protest for whatever the day’s protest schedule was.