Jump to content

Hornyskunk

Member
  • Posts

    91
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hornyskunk

  1. Try playing video games. Alternatively, trade me lives and I'll play video games for you.

    PC strategy games from Paradox (i.e. Europa Universalis IV), Firaxis (i.e. Civilization V) and Creative Assembly (i.e. Total War Rome II) can be very intellectually challenging, especially against human opponents, and do not require youthful reaction times. They are also mostly history-based, appealing to an older crowd. I play these games when I get tired of mass murdering children in other games (or when I lose to that one teenager in a thousand that is actually better than me).

  2. Where I work, a staff position is highly desirable, but most work is done by consultants. I would guess that the ratio between staff and consultants is about 1:1.

    1) For a staff member in a senior technical position (such as a senior economist) with 10+ years of experience, salary is at least 300k/month. I highly doubt any make less than that, but would not be surprised to learn that some earn more than double. Most non-senior staff make around 200k/month and typically do not have 10+ years of experience. Pay for consultants is highly variable and depends on things like experience, field of expertise and demand. Many consultants are paid similarly to staff and have worked here for years. Unfortunately, a lot of guys in IT, logistics, operations, etc. are losing their contracts to Thais due to policy changes. Some staff and consultants are required to travel frequently, for which they are paid extra on travel days.

    2) For both consultants and staff, health and life insurance are pretty basic. For staff, health also covers dental, vision and dependents. No housing allowance or insurance. No vehicle allowance or insurance.

    3) Pensions for staff, but I'm 27 without dependents so I haven't paid any attention. Several of our staff are retiring soon, however, and based on our conversations, I imagine it is pretty good.

    4) Regardless of where you work, you should expect your employer to shoulder all costs associated with moving to and working in Thailand.

  3. Ok... I admit it... I came here to have sex. I would have never come to Thailand on my own for any reason except to have sex.

    Does it make me a sexpat though if I was having sex with the girl before coming here? In other words, I followed the pussy here, I didn't get here first and then start looking for it.

    There should be another word for that. I don't want to be lumped in the same category as my dad.

  4. Hey, sometimes governments do good things. I voted for the full legalization of marijuana in Colorado and it actually passed. I am still shocked.
    It's funny how peoples views can differ. I totaly agree with you on the pot thing but totaly disagree with you on the marriage thing. I am a single hetrosexual man (have a gf). I have no issues at all with gay marriage. If two guys or girls want to marry why should it bother me. Giving tax breaks to parents is something I could agree with but not based on sexuality or ethnicity.

    Tax breaks aren't going to stop gay people getting married.

    The way some are so disgusted by gay people is quite funny. You would almost think they were scared they might catch "gay"

    I don't want to stop gays from being together in legally-recognized unions, I just want the state to call it anything other than "marriage" and to do something to protect traditional marriages that produce children, which I believe are a cornerstone of any society. I think that other demographic groups, not just gays, should respect and contribute to traditional married couples with children in exchange for state recognition and protection of their rights. Just as we pay taxes to sustain armed forces for our national security, we should also pay taxes to sustain parents and their children for our nation's future.

    If the state will not promote traditional marriages by requiring gay "marriages" to contribute taxes to support them, I will not support gay marriage. I think that is a fair tradeoff.

    If a minority group wants to benefit from state protection of their rights, they should pay taxes to support the majority. For example, immigrants should pay taxes to support citizens, abortees should pay taxes to support mothers, gun owners should pay taxes to support police, polluters should pay taxes to support environmentalists, etc.

    In Colorado, weed is taxed to support schools. Colorado was previously one of the worst states in terms of public education. Based on my own experience, I believe that potheads in Colorado are overwhelmingly in favor of paying consumption taxes (in some jurisdictions up to 50%) to support education. I think that even the old farts on their farms in "Northern Colorado", who actually voted to secede from the state over the marijuana issue, would agree that weed has been a huge economic boon for the state and that the tax revenues are completely transforming schools. I see no reason why this political strategy cannot be applied to gays and other minority groups with similar successes for both sides of the issue.

  5. DECIDES to be gay??? lol

    Yes, gay people decide to be gay.

    I don't like this BS about some kind of biological programming which forces someone to be gay. When I was 13, I felt my biology was forcing me to hump anything with a vagina, yet I chose not to. If an insanely horny 13-year-old can make the conscious decision to masturbate rather than have sex with the class slut, then anyone can, gay or straight. Anyone can choose abstinence. I don't recommend it, but please don't have sex with someone and then tell the world that you couldn't have avoided it just because you were born that way.

    Tell the truth: I am a man/woman and I chose to have sex with a man/woman because that's what I like and that is my right!

    I wish I could use the excuse that my biology forces me to smoke weed in order to be happy. Unfortunately, as humans, our brains give us near total control over our natural urges.

  6. I know I'll get so much hate for this...

    I believe in the half-your-age-plus-seven rule with regards to maximum age disparities in sexual relationships.

    It should be made a law and replace the age of consent (effectively making the age of consent 14, permissible only between two 14-year-olds).

    I don't like seeing old men with young women or old women with young men.

    In my defense, I am a young man.violin.gif

  7. Homosexuals should not be allowed to marry.

    They should be allowed to be together in legally-recognized unions that are differentiated from heterosexual marriages by the state for the purposes of taxation and wealth redistribution.

    I believe that divorcees, immigrants, singles and homosexuals should be taxed to benefit heterosexual marriages, especially those which produce children, in order to maintain a nationalistic demographic ideal. I think this is only fair, as something must be done to ensure that heterosexual marriages with children are encouraged for the sustainability of a nation and its culture.

    This means that immigrant couples with children should not receive the same benefits unless at least one parent is a national. Homosexual couples with children should also not receive tax breaks.

    Edit: BTW there are a lot more disgusting things in public than gay asscheeks. At least those guys look like they shower.

  8. My sentiments exactly. One thing economists are good for...uh sorry I forget. Economics is not and never can be a science. It's a course in college. In the real world they serve little purpose. The above economist is consistently losing money every month changing USD to Baht. Why would you do that? To make a killing when the big turnaround comes? No one thinks that's about to happen except apparently the above economist.

    Leave the speculation about where the exchange rate is going to the forex traders.

    I am converting my savings to THB because I don't need USD in Thailand and I need to pay a dowry eventually. Anyway, my salary is paid in USD to my US bank and my "savings" is actually recently sold stock, as I am expecting a Fed rate hike later this year that will force a market correction. I am not a forex trader, but neither am I ignorant of the indicators that forex traders monitor to update their algorithms. It is likely that the USD will gain on the THB in the short-term, especially when (or if) the Fed raises rates, but the dollar is already overvalued compared to other currencies. If you are not in a hurry to trade THB for USD, just wait; your purchasing power will increase.

    Nobody forces you to respect or listen to economists just as nobody forces you to respect or listen to doctors. Doctors ensure your health, while economists ensure your wealth. Economics cannot be a natural science because human behaviors cannot be defined in unfalsifiable models.

    ACH is an acronym of sorts for Automated Clearing House. To oversimplify, it's the financial settlement system for transferring money in the U.S. banking system. U.S. federal law limits the number of ACH transactions per month from a US savings account to six but - to my knowledge - there is no limit on amounts.

    As you mentioned, you would have no difficulties wire transferring money from the proceeds of a property sale.

    US domestic ACH transfers to Bangkok Bank are a cost-effective way to exchange USD for THB as the transfer is free (depending on your bank), BKKBK charges very little and the exchange rate is excellent. My two banks both limit ACH transfers to $5000 per day or per transfer. I can increase the limit upon request, of course, but that could raise suspicions within the bank or the IRS when the money is leaving the country, or so I've heard. For me, international wire transfers take too long, are expensive and will need to be reported to the IRS if over $10000. I am not a tax professional, so I don't know what the IRS is up to, but I'm sure they could come up with some reason to tax me.

  9. Feel sorry for you and millions alike USA citizens who somehow think arming everyone promotes a safe society. You need to live a few years or decades in a west European country or Canada to appreciate how safe feeling it is that the population is not armed to the teeth. Most farang feel perfectly safe in Thailand without a gun including me. But I guess that's because I'm not American.

    To each his own.

    No, he's actually wrong.

    Murder happens where crime is profitable.

    No point being a drug dealer in Alaska ...... not enough potential customers.

    No point being a mugger on the plains .... not enough potential victims.

    That is a valid argument, but it is also conducive to the theory that population density encourages crime. You may be interested to know that Alaska is some kind of frozen hell where rates of drug use, homicide and gun ownership are all moderate to high. I'm guessing it has something to do with being so close to Russia. whistling.gif

    I read the BBC during breakfast and found this story on the decline of US power:

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33440287

    It appears we should be less concerned about anarchy in the US and more concerned about anarchy in the world thanks to the ineptitude of Mubarak Hussein Osama in foreign affairs.

  10. I might be late, but I have a job suggestion for the OP.

    Have you considered working on a cruise ship? Several lines operate around Southeast Asia and stop at ports in Thailand.

    I love going on cruises and I always take advantage of the top-notch gym and trainers. In my experience, fitness is not much of a priority for cruisegoers so I often get great one-on-one training. I don't know what they get paid or how they get the job, but it might be worth looking into.

  11. I came from the US to Thailand 6 months ago and tried desperately to avoid teaching, as the salary is way too low for me. For 6 months, I was unemployed, living off savings, and I made a small income of around 15k baht per month writing research papers for college students.

    Interestingly, if I had actually tried, this could have been a viable freelance job in the long-term, as I made around 15k baht per month writing 3-4 papers based on other people's research. All my customers were from two departments at one university. If I had devoted my time to it and sought customers at other universities, I'm sure I could have at least tripled my income.

    To do this, however, you would need to be a good writer and to have already published some research papers on your own

×
×
  • Create New...
""