Jump to content

Sule9

Member
  • Posts

    81
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sule9

  1. Well said sir !!  This is the heart of the issue. 
     
    As one of millions of children who migrated after WW2 I know exactly what it means to go to another country to live.  Whilst there was some 'settling in' period, and later for the other groups of migrants who came from other countries, the inevitable result was peaceful integration. This has NOT been the case for one particular group who started arriving in numbers since the late 90s. The more that come from this group, the more the problems increased.  Whilst many people  of some groups integrated less than others (eg. china town), they still peacefully adopted and did not threaten or demand changes to our culture (live and let live). 
     
    History shows that the Muslim culture has never (not once) peacefully integrated into another culture/civilisation. The reality is that they incompatible with western societies - period. Their culture is one based on the overthrow and domination of all other cultures. 
     
    There is only one outcome in my opinion. Either the muslim 'church' will be reformed from within, as was the Christian 'church' in 15/16 centuries, or they will be driven out - as was previously done in most of southern Europe. Actually, there is another - they will win and in 200 years our people and culture will become Muslim.

    With due respect, you must read history properly again and again.
  2. 'self-declared refugees' - would be those who are referred to as refugees by themselves as well as fuzzy-minded media and lefties even though they are only seeking asylum or have already been refused (or in may cases have not formally claimed asylum, they're just illegals). The second option in your poll postulates an ideal situation where countries take in a quota of those whose identities are not in doubt and have already been declared to be refugees who pose no threat to the proposed host country. But you can't in honesty pose that ideal without also asking 'How many'?
     
    The UK has an estimated 1 million illegal entrants, overstayers and failed asylum seekers milling round the country, a situation which has been allowed to happen by a combination of incompetence by the Home Office, blatant exploitation by a rapacious Human Rights Industry and a general woolly-minded attitude towards the "refugee" and illegals problem.
     
    I merely say that until the country, any country, puts itself in the position of being able to grant residence to those whom it chooses and remove any and all who are not entitled to be there, the welcome to genuine refugees will always be grudging and inadequate. And, incidentally, anyone who believes that Brexit (of which I am in favour) will really give the UK "control of its borders" doesn't really understand what that will take.

    Perfect. UK wants to continue economic benefits even after the exit. You will not be able to see English choclates in the supermarkets in Budapest the same way you will not see a Hungarian or Polish in service industry in UK. So there is always a cost for gaining something.
  3. Not really because it's a visa and it stays valid.
    I have had a few instances where companies have tried to tell me they have to cancel my visa when I finished work. I just said no you can't and kept my passport in my pocket. It's mostly companies who have no clue on the difference between an extension of stay, usually done based on a single entry B, and a Multi B.
    Most of us are posting about to help people to avoid problems, not just to prove people wrong.
    Many threads on this on TV and the Guru ( UBJ ) and some others are just trying to help.

    Thanks for clerifying to the gentlemen who asked this question on his worries as in my first reply to him is the same as you said that visa is valid and he must get the WP renewed only and when his non b visa is about to expire then he can apply for 1 year extension. I hope its clear!
×
×
  • Create New...