Jump to content

CG1 Blue

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,807
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CG1 Blue

  1. 2 hours ago, gomangosteen said:

    I'm 187cm, just under 6'3" for non-metrics.

     

    I haven't felt at risk of falling over any balcony rail. Neither do I fall into the water on rail-free boardwalks in the mangrove forest near us.

     

    I'm aware there is a drop. 

     

    Just checked the ones across the front of our house 90cm / 3ft; that's fine. One would have to be almost running to 'nose dive' or more likely in these recent ones, p1ssed.

     

    Six years at this place we haven't lost a family member or guest.

    What's the point of having a 3ft high balcony rail? As a 6ft 3' man you'll not be able to lean on it to admire the view, and it certainly wouldn't prevent you from falling if you lost your balance one day. 

     

    Why not just have a 1ft high rail, or no rail at all? Maybe just a row of nice plants...

    • Haha 1
  2. 2 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

     

    I don't see any assessment in the subject study of what the alternate results would have been if the U.K. government had not responded to COVID as it did, in terms of increased illness/hospitalizations and deaths from COVID, not only among children but among everyone.

     

    That would be an interesting subject to plumb, if there were legitimate means to make those kinds of comparisons.

     

    Earlier lockdown could have saved lives of 30,000, Hancock tells Covid inquiry

     

    Tens of thousands of lives could have been saved if the UK had locked down three weeks earlier, Matt Hancock has told the Covid inquiry, as he described the operation of Boris Johnson’s Downing Street as undermined by a “culture of fear”.

    ...

    Hancock argued that in retrospect the ideal date for a first lockdown would have been three weeks earlier than the eventual date of 23 March 2020, saying this could have prevented about 90% of the death toll in the first Covid wave, or more than 30,000 lives.

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/30/hancock-tells-covid-inquiry-of-toxic-culture-in-johnson-government

     

     

    'In normal circumstances, scientists would wait for the research to be peer-reviewed and published in a scientific journal to read the final word from the authors. But the latest headline-grabbing version, “Did lockdowns work?” has come out as a book – a “revised and extended” version of the May working paper. Its publisher is the neoliberal thinktank, the Institute of Economic Affairs, credited with coming up with many of Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng’s free market policies.

     

    The book maintains that lockdowns – as defined by the authors – prevented 3.2% of US and EU deaths in the first wave of the pandemic. But it notes that based on nine specific NPIs, lockdowns in Europe and the US reduced mortality by 10.7% in the spring of 2020 – about 23,000 in Europe and 16,000 in the US."

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jun/05/revised-report-on-impact-of-covid-lockdowns-leaves-unanswered-questions

     

    In short, I think I'm pointing out, people can recover from childhood obesity. But once you're dead from COVID, there's no coming back.

     

     

    This is the trouble. It's very easy to find statistics on lives saved from lockdowns. But we'll probably never be told how many lives have / will be lost due to the impact of lockdowns. 

     

    "people can recover from childhood obesity" I'm sure you know full well it's not that simple. 

     

     

     

    • Thumbs Up 1
  3. One of the many serious consequences of over the top measures taken during the pandemic. 

    Nobody in authority seemed to weigh up the dangers of COVID 19 versus the dangers of locking the world down. The 'slow burn' effects of lockdowns etc. will take at least a decade to heal. And sadly the resultant death numbers will probably dwarf C19 deaths. 

     

    In the UK the government were pushed into strict measures by the mainstream press and political opposition. They should've stuck to their guns. 

    • Confused 1
    • Agree 2
  4. 1 hour ago, retarius said:

    Decent people are aghast tat the genocide in Gaza conducted by IDF troops.

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2024/jan/26/middle-east-crisis-live-updates-icj-genocide-case-ruling-israel-hamas-gaza-hostage-talks-cia

     

    So are all you Israel genocide supporters gonna change your minds.....no I thought not...I look forward to hearing why the ICJ decision is wrong, corrupt,.perverted.That the ICJ is a tool of SA and always sides with Africans.

     

     

    I think you're over interpreting the outcome of the case. It's not as black and white as you make out. Others have explained why above. 

     

    You also don't seem to be aware that Hamas have been 'ordered' to release the hostages, and we all know that's not going to happen. Or do you think they will?

     

    It's blinkered views like yours that cause and prolong wars. Try to think more constructively. 

    • Like 1
  5. 18 minutes ago, recom273 said:

     

    Absolutely, he should not bow down to bullying - but living in Asia, do we not understand different ways of dealing with situations than direct confrontation?

     

    The media outlets that seemed to have picked up the story are a bit predictable .. TalkTV, Daily Mail, Fox News.

     

     

     

    Personally I would have just ignored them and carried on. Why should we be worried about 'provoking the Chinese', especially a bunch of entitled student pro CCP activists? 

     

    I don't agree with Dr K's way of handling it (he's an attention seeker), but I also don't agree with appeasing bullies like the passive aggressive shouty man. 

  6. 8 hours ago, recom273 said:

    I agree, he just played the part of an obnoxious Brit (im British myself) - why not just tell them, "yes, of course I will delete your images on a livestream, ok, yes, no problem" and let them walk away - no need to provoke the Chinese

    I agree Dr K comes across as a bit of a tw 4t. But why should he give in to bullying from a group of Chinese activists? 

     

    Especially the Chinese guy who starts shouting at Dr K for 'touching' the Chinese girl. Apparently this is a popular tactic in China. Over reacting to something to get the other person in trouble so you can sue them. 

    Funny how shouty Chinese boy was so quiet when then the big younger English guy confronted them towards the end of the video. Typical bully. 

     

    A selection of the comments online: 

     

    The "don't touch her" overeaction was purposeful. They wanted to create an scenario where they could win, because they realized they were not going to win with their request. It is a manipulation tactic.

    Hong kong stands with you ,Dr.K. loved your performance

    You got my support man. From California. How dare they come here and dictate what you can do in your own country.

    Montréal, Quebec Canada. Great playing and in a democratic free society you are a beacon of light. The show must go on

    Support for your stand from Australia. That guy appears to be a CCP officer who’s not used to hearing “No”!

    Hell Yeah!! Thank you so much for your beautiful speech Dr.K. We Japan stands with you. We’ll follow you for protecting freedom of speech

    As a Chinese, I also stand with the YouTuber. Don't know what those guys are doing and watching this video makes me feel embarrassed.

    • Thumbs Up 1
  7. 30 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

    Two children and the friend of their mother murdered in Norwich.

     

    999 call went unanswered.

     

    Utter tragedy.

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/24/two-girls-found-dead-in-house-near-norwich-were-murdered-say-police

    I believe the woman who was killed was the sister of the girls' mother (their auntie). 

    The father wasn't working due to mental health issues. Sister was over from Thailand staying with the family. The girls' mum was at work. 

    Sounds like he killed them all then took his own life (or the auntie fought back and got one fatal stab in). 

    Earlier reports did say he called the police and told them he had concerns about his mental state, and the police advised him to seek medical help. Who knows if that was before or after he'd killed them. 

    IOPC investigation ongoing. 

    Awful tragic story. 

    • Agree 1
  8. 7 hours ago, Tongjaw said:

    Young kids too. Thailand is becoming as bad as UK for knife crimes by youngsters.

    Are you kidding? If this had happened in London the victim would be dead or seriously injured. Those Thai kids must've been using the blades simply to scare the guy. Not that that makes it right, but just saying. 

    I feel 10x safer walking alone at night in Thai cities than back home. 

    • Agree 1
  9. 2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

    I think people who argue for removing the UK from international human rights laws and the ECHR in order to enact laws that they have been advised will in any case break UK law are rightwing extremists.

     

    Feel free to differ.

    It sounds like you've made up your own definition for right wing extremism to add weight to your arguments.  

    Do you have your own label for the actual right wing extremists such as the National Front, EDL etc? Are they 'extreme extremists' or something? 

     

     

  10. This scaremongering should have been made illegal by now.  Enough is enough! 

     

    The global economy has lost trillions (or quadrillions?) due to Covid lockdowns and other measures taken by the authorities. It'll take years, maybe decades to recover.  

     

    It would be almost impossible to calculate the number of deaths caused by lockdowns etc. Authorities are probably too scared to do that analysis. 

     

    The Covid worshippers saw the measures as sacrificing economic activity and enjoyment to save lives. They really didn't think it through.

     

    Economic catastrophes cause more deaths than a virus. That's not even taking into consideration the effects of scaremongering on mental health. 

    • Confused 2
    • Agree 1
  11. 6 hours ago, KhunLA said:

    Sadly, from experience, owning and with ICEV only, yea, I've been that stupid, and ran out of petrol.   In my younger days, from simply not realizing/noticing and or forgetting to get petrol, to, sadly, 'oh hell, I cam make it' ... oops, F'me :cheesy:

     

    Pretty sure that will never happen with the EV, as the car gives you way too many warnings @ 30%, 20% both visual and audio. 

    Not sure how old your last ICE vehicle was, but there are plenty of warnings in modern cars. My ICE has the number of remaining fuel miles visible at all times, and I get warnings (visual and annoying bong sounds) when it drops below certain levels. 

  12. 11 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

     

    it only happened if you can prove it. It's so far off the planet that I don't believe it did.

    Wait, you don't believe that gangs of mainly Pakistani Muslim men were (and still are) grooming girls (aged 12-16!) across England since the 1980s? 

     

    People turning a blind eye to this issue were a big part of the problem!

     

  13. On 12/26/2023 at 6:28 AM, youreavinalaff said:

    Anyhow, if there were not any immigrants working in UK, a very large percentage of care homes would be grossly understaffed or closed down due to lack of staff. Many people in need of domiciliary care would not get it.

    That's a myth trotted out by the left. If care homes couldn't employ cheap staff from abroad they'd be forced to offer proper wages, and then locals would apply for the roles. Immigrants are simply keeping wages low in care homes.  

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...