rdhowell

I opened an account at Krungsri Bank. No work permit. However, haven't tried with PayPal, as I remember an issue that one person stated above about using PayPal from Thailand.

My order was placed from US online company. Order shipped and is now here in Thailand. Expect any day now.

However, the charge was credited back to my account! So I have essentially paid nothing. If I get the package, that will be very strange. Notified the vendor and they say nothing wrong has happened on their end. Notified the bank, and they were to call back. 4 days and no call back.

Anyone else ever had such a thing happen?

As a starting point (regarding the last reply from the OP), here is the relevant background info., followed by the evidence.

1. There are only three ways to end - destroy - a marriage: annulment, death, and divorce. Annulment is irrelevant here. Death is also irrelevant, because the topic here is divorce.

2. Wikipedia will serve as a source for reliable statistics for the purposes of this discussion:  "According to a study published in the American Law and Economics Review, women have filed slightly more than two-thirds of divorce cases in the United States.^[111] This trend is mirrored in the UK where a recent study into web search behavior found that 70% of divorce inquiries were from women. These findings also correlate with the Office for National Statistics publication "Divorces in England and Wales 2012^[112] which reported that divorce petitions from women outnumber those from men by 2 to 1."

Unless someone can present evidence to the contrary, a logical extrapolation can be made: women file for divorce much more so than men. (This discussion assumes heterosexual couples.)

Conclusion: Since the only way to destroy a marriage is by filing and getting a divorce (annulment and death not relevant), therefore, by logical extension; by necessity; BY DEFINITION, it is the woman, not the man, who is to blame for destroying, by far, most marriages. Period.

Now, beyond this simple fact, of course most women will ignore this and proceed directly to giving, what they think, are "reasons" and "justifications" for their divorce (and, sadly, far too many ignorant men will buy what they offer in their defense).

Nontheless, in most cases, no legitimate reason(s) or justification (s) exist. They are simply excuses.

Now, if anyone cannot wrap their head around this simple truth; cannot get past this first step; then it signifies they will not accept more unpleasant truths to follow.

Decide for yourself if you are ready for that challenge.

Ok. I think we can include the Christian Theology. Might be useful/relevant later. Back to the original post. Piece by piece.

(1) "So what are the odds the Thai woman was 100% at fault in all these divorce cases?

I say 0% and thus the topic: Are you a Loser?"

If "those cases" are presumed to be different from, let's say, the average divorce case (worldwide), then perhaps the discussion won't be relevant. But it seems the OP was trying to make a point about divorce in general, not just restricting it to "Thai women" and "foreign men."

Assuming this, my thoughts on (1) are:

Sure, the odds that the woman is 100% at fault in ALL divorce cases is, let's just say, unreasonable. 

More accurately, that statement (alone) doesn't make much sense without some context added to it.

However, a woman can certainly be at fault in some divorce cases.

In fact, "the odds" that a woman is at fault in MOST divorce cases is, simply put,  not about odds whatsoever.

it is simply the fact.

Stated simply: In most divorce cases, it is the woman who is at fault.

Yes, you read right. 

As we shall see, this is a necessary fact. It has nothing to do with speculation or theory.

Moreover, on detailed analysis, once you get past this fact, not even the auxiliary issues, in most cases, will exonerate the woman.

In sum, in most cases, it is the woman who not only single-handedly destroys a marriage, but who also does so unjustifiably.

So much for part (1).

Just now, rdhowell said:

 

Don't know how that quote got sent without my reply, sorry folks.

Anyhow. Wow, that was interesting. I could sure enjoy a philosophical/theological discussion as it relates to this marriage/relationship topic, but that might get off track of the thread here, but then again it might fit very well!

Have to ponder a bit....

14 hours ago, soalbundy said:

never heard of him but I will look him up. Not predestination, currents appear under the water, we can't see them and they can seem to happen from nowhere but there is a cause, perhaps 2 km away downstream, everything is connected but we have no influence over the prime cause of events we can only react to the manifestations in our immediate space. How we react is important, we can align ourselves with what I call universal consciousness by completely accepting the event without an internal dialogue of complaint ''This is so unfair'' etc. and then react with the acknowledgement 'it is as it is', this is positive and can stop the chain reaction of the prime cause, or one reacts with anger and despair and becomes another link in the chain reaction affecting your surroundings with negative energy. Having said that it must be accepted that your reaction is also largely out of your control, dependant on genetics and your life's story which has preconditioned you to react in a certain way, pavlovian if you will.Making the mind your servant instead of letting it be your master is the only way to break the cycle but the destruction of 'the little me' the ego, takes years of hard work, I've been at it for 5 years and I am far from done.

Coins.co.th is the company that finally worked for me.

bx.in.th sent me through an hour + of this and that, only to reject me because I was not a "business" or not an investor or something. Yet they never indicated that requirement up front. 

I am only an English teacher here and investing is not even on the radar at this point!

I only want to purchase something from the US that only takes cryptocurrencies.

So, my next problem may be that the company doesn't take the particular type of crypto, but I think it's BTC so I think I am ok.

Maybe coins.co.th isn't the cheapest exchange, or the fees are higher, idk at this point. I'm learning this whole process. But if I'm able to purchase, then I'll start comparing rates, etc.

Thanks to all for the helpful comments.

7 hours ago, bwpage3 said:

Put in his place?

 

You shouldn't be ashamed of yourself and walk around with your head up.

 

That way you would see the multitude of losers on the lose in Thailand.

 

There has already been a few photos posted.

 

Did you not see them?

I assume you meant "should be ashamed..."?

Ok. Not gonna argue too much with you. Sure, there are "losers" here in Thailand, in my home country, everywhere. Photos or not.

You and I don't seem to disagree too much. 

Thanks for the input.

Thanks. Yea I finally found a company and am good to go. But two Thai companies are misrepresenting themselves, if not outright lying. No worries.

Hahaha. Yep. Most of you men here have sufficiently called out this OP. Despite the futile attempts to hit back, he has been put in his place.

Really no point in engaging any further. Good grief, the (person, "man" not applicable here) is actually a Sub-Loser. 

Yea, let's make Sbluzer a new word for such.

On 2/2/2018 at 9:47 AM, Jabers said:

if you are interested in fast, free, instant crypto transfers, the coin right now that is gaining lots of popularity is XRB (raiblocks, but recently renamed to "nano").

 

but a word of warning to noobies, stay away from icos until you understand the technology or have money you are willing to risk/gamble and will not be mad if it is all lost.

What do you mean by transfers?

Absolutely Thanks to all you people reading but NOT RESPONDING in any way. 

For use in purchasing from a US company?

Why is this so difficult?

Please Help.

22 hours ago, webfact said:

"We have intercepted a lot of drugs over the past year ... but the production capacity remains untouched."

"Well done by the Thailand police" ?

How amusing. Keep dreaming.

"people who produce and distribute ice should be executed".

No, the people in Big Pharma and many others in the "medical establishment" should be lined up first. There won't be enough lethal injection drugs left after that. Then consideration can be made  for these others. You have the cart before the horse.

If possible, go to a city elsewhere (not Bangkok). I got mine in Yasothon. A video, a color chart identifying test, exam (with several errors on it btw), and short road test. None of those other requirements.

Much easier.

Apparently, the death penalty is still, "on the books", possible. But it is no longer Mandatory:

"Importantly, the death penalty is no longer mandatory for traffickers or producers of Class 1 narcotic for the purpose of disposal.  The judge can now assess every case on its own merits - and can give a life sentence or the death penalty."

Amendment to Article 65 (2):  change of penalty to be less punitive for "the sale of drugs":

"Old Act
Death Penalty

Amendments
Life imprisonment and a fine of 1 million baht - 5 million baht, or death penalty."

If it is true that the death penalty is rarely or never applied, I would be interested in reading a source for this.

The sources for the above quotes I can provide if it is not against the rules on this forum.

Not sure if applies. Just got back Tuesday from there. Went in with Tourist and came back with Non-O total 90 days, but I have a son here and mother in-law verifies my address where he lives with her in Yasothon.

Ok. Thanks.

The onward ticket will give you peace of mind, but like previous poster said, unlikely anyone will ask. As far as 20,000 baht, same here. Peace of mind. A bank statement I see no need for, but if you have time, I guess more peace of mind. (Where does the bank statement requirement enter the picture, oldskoolneatz?) Not questioning your accuracy, just want to look that up. Thanks.

I disagree. As mentioned, airlines "require" proof of ability to leave country. Regardless. Please show proof otherwise. In fact, airlines are "contracted" with foreign government s to accept cost of returning traveler.Marketing ploy. BUT, the airline has to sue the customer for reimbursement. Civil. Not criminal.

If they don't know if you have another ticket, why not? Show ticket. Done deal.

4 hours ago, 50soon said:

ok guys, I will try to board with only one way ticket and  statement of my bank and letter of invitation for Thailand .

I was asked one day in the  USA by custom why I didn't have a return flight, I said I will book later as I will go visit another state and I showed them my several bank cards and they let me enter after being scolded that with under the visa waiver rule  I need a return ticket within 90 days. But at this time I was young (30 yo).

 

I guess if it was a requirement to have a return ticket absolutely for Thailand , the airline would ask for document before buying a flight. anyway, I will stop to stress about it.

 

Thank you for your comments.

Probably the best way solution (unless you're rich and have money to throw away!). See this:

"So here’s the issue: technically speaking, immigration could deny you entry to a country for a range of different reasons. If that were to happen, the airline would be liable for flying you back to your point of origin. That’s why airlines can sometimes get a little fussy when you’re trying to fly on a single ticket. Even though they sold you a one way ticket, once you actually get to the check-in desk they might start to ask you about your return ticket or proof of onward travel. That’s because they don’t want to risk having to take you back if there’s any issues at all at immigration..." (Like you mentioned, sold you one-way anyhow? Could be to hold you up and force you to buy round-trip knowing you are desperate = $$$ for them? Hmmmm)

"...a few times I’ve flown on an intercontinental flight one-way. Once, when flying with Virgin Airlines one-way from London to Mexico, I was actually asked about why I didn’t have a return. I explained to the lady at check-in that I was a backpacker going on a longer trip, and I don’t yet know when I was going back. I also said that I was planning to be in Mexico for about 60 days (the visa-on-arrival gives you 90 days). This was enough for her to drop the subject, and she promptly checked me in."

Finally: "There were two times when I had some actual issues. Once was when flying one-way from Singapore to the Philippines with AirAsia. I was told that immigration requires proof of onward travel. There were only 15 minutes left until check-in would close, so I ran around looking for an internet cafe at the airport, and then booked the cheapest possible flight out of the Philippines with AirAsia just in the nick of time. It cost about 30 Euros, and I booked it not actually expecting to use it (and I ultimately didn’t). Showing this booking let me get on the flight with no further questions asked."

So maybe get there early and look up a cheap flight on your phone/laptop to Kuala Lumpur ($60-70) and be ready to purchase in a few minutes if a problem so you don't miss flight. Just show them on your phone will be proof enough. Otherwise, call me from the airport as I am close to an immigration official who has pulled many strings for me here. (Just kidding about the call, wouldn't be allowed on this forum to give my number). :)

I don't know the "rules" in Canada or Eva Airlines. But if it were me, I would have pushed back. Show her my non-O. But also I would have thanked her for following the"rules", as these people are probably underpaid, overworked, worried about getting into trouble with the boss, etc. I am not an @$$.  But I hate big business, big pharma, corrupt politicians, you name it - stealing, lying, et Al. And will call them out and make them pay if I possibly can.

Perhaps "scam" is throwing you off. It's a rip-off. If the reasons behind this "requirement" were as serious as stated in writing by both airlines and (in this case Thailand) immigration, fully 90+% of travelers would NOT be boarding without any agent checking for onward ticket. And Thai immigration WOULD be requiring proof of ability to leave before visa ends.

Moreover, what about the other written requirements? You "must" have enough money to support yourself by immigration rules. Never been asked to show money, bank account, or anything. You "must" have proof of local address where staying. Never been asked for proof of that either. Local address where you are staying? Put down an invalid address, you will pass through no problem. No checks.

This is simple math folks; it's a rip-off, scam, corruption.

Want more proof from sources if the obviousness of it is too difficult to see?

I will supply.

A scam. Yes.

On 3/9/2018 at 3:54 PM, DJ54 said:

Typically in US if you book a one way ticket your red flagged to be questioned by TSA. 

"Typically", really?

Been here from US 4 times. Last time was 1 year ago. Never been asked for onward ticket. 3 times had only one way. American Airlines, and affiliate international (Korean Air, Quatar, Air Asia). No visa upon arrival. Maybe red flagged (source?), but ticket agent hardly ever, if ever, cares about a "red flag". TSA, (f this is true), is probably getting kickback from airlines to say this/put it in writing, whatever.

While the advice to be prepared with onward ticket is perhaps still good advice, I'm beginning to think the airlines are picking up on this (reading these forums).  They are simply making tons of money for useless unused tickets. Thai customs has never asked me either. Even during "high risk" times when there was a supposed crackdown on visa requirements, foreigners entering w/o "enough" money to stay,   terrorist threat level increased, etc.

It's a scam. And you will lose your money. But for some, the peace of mind is better. But again, if airlines are seeing these warnings on forums, they are smiling. Perhaps a movement in the opposite direction by travelers will stop this corrupt nonsense. Of course, if Thai officials start checking (per Thai "rules"), and I've never been asked once to show proof, what can you do? :)

Nonetheless, peace of mind, for now, may be more valuable.

4 hours ago, DJ54 said:

Typically in US if you book a one way ticket your red flagged to be questioned by TSA. 

"Typically", really?

Been here from US 4 times. Last time was 1 year ago. Never been asked for onward ticket. 3 times had only one way. American Airlines, and affiliate international (Korean Air, Quatar, Air Asia). No visa upon arrival. Maybe red flagged (source?), but ticket agent hardly ever, if ever, cares about a "red flag". TSA, (f this is true), is probably getting kickback from airlines to say this/put it in writing, whatever.

While the advice to be prepared with onward ticket is perhaps still good advice, I'm beginning to think the airlines are picking up on this (reading these forums).  They are simply making tons of money for useless unused tickets. Thai customs has never asked me either. Even during "high risk" times when there was a supposed crackdown on visa requirements, foreigners entering w/o "enough" money to stay,   terrorist threat level increased, etc.

It's a scam. And you will lose your money. But for some, the peace of mind is better. But again, if airlines are seeing these warnings on forums, they are smiling. Perhaps a movement in the opposite direction by travelers will stop this corrupt nonsense. Of course, if Thai officials start checking (per Thai "rules"), and I've never been asked once to show proof, what can you do? :)

Nonetheless, peace of mind, for now, may be more valuable.