firemans35
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by firemans35
-
-
14 hours ago, pomchop said: Meantime mr red bull continues to enjoy his freedom after killing a cop while hoped up on cocaine.
Maybe the swede just didn't understand how many big envelopes need to be distributed.
I wanted to read the comments to see how long it would take for someone to mention the Red Bull Guy. 15th comment. I'm sure Red Bull Guy isn't living an under the radar life.
-
-
Date 13 Dec 2025 but in the complaint is uses the Chinese/Thai date of 2568, strange. Like a few people have said, I'm not sure if this is real but it mentions taking 50 hours of pay from the December pay cycle. As it's 15 Dec when it was written are they saying they are taking money from the employee for OT already worked? Making that person work OT without paying? Bothh illegal under Thai law from what I've read. So if it was mandatory for the employee to attend the event, were they being paid to attend?
-
- Popular Post
Quote"In a significant operation at Phuket International Airport, immigration officers apprehended a 41-year-old Austrian national on November 15, catching him with fraudulent entry and exit stamps in his passport. The man, who has not been named by authorities, was found to have overstayed his visa by an astounding 578 days, and his arrest took place in the international departure hall at approximately 5:20 p.m."
Not so significant. He was in the International Departure terminal, probably leaving the country after only being in Thailand 578 days. I read a story about someone being caught after 20 years, that's significant. I'm sure the Thai Police are very aware of the fake stamp scheme, arrest the people giving him the fake stamps, that would be significant.
-
2
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
As mentioned in one of my earlier posts, there is no one on Interpol's website by the name Vorayuth Yoovidhya or Yoovidhya Vorayuth. There wasn't one now or about 5 years ago (The last time I looked). A search for just Thai people produced the results in the photo and opening up the page for one of those people produce a page that doesn't look like what's being posted on this forum
-
On 8/29/2025 at 2:17 AM, Liverpool Lou said:
Yes....
There are no Red Notices on Interpol's website for anyone by this name. There are only 3 Thai people wanted and he's not one of them. A search provides 3 results and clicking on one of those results produces info on the wanted person that on a page that looks nothing like this. Perhaps this is an old page but still there is no person by this name on Interpol's website. For reading a post above it seems like this photo was published in a Bangkok newspaper. After some research on the actual Interpol website today and 5 years ago, it would appear this post is possibly fake or it was removed a long time ago, as there are no Red Notices for this person. Fake or removed makes a person wonder.
-
1
-
-
On 8/28/2025 at 10:54 PM, unblocktheplanet said:
Is there an Interpol red notice for this shameless billionaire?
On 8/28/2025 at 11:04 PM, Liverpool Lou said:A search on the interpol site for that name shows he's not on the Interpol website. A search looking for just Thai people produces 3 results and he's not one of them.
-
- Popular Post
Does Thailand have a law against filming people without their permission in a public place? Where I'm from if you're in a public place you have no reasonable right to privacy.
-
3
-
7
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
11 hours ago, snoop1130 said:
A Kazakh businessman filed a complaint with the Phuket Governor after being tricked by Ukrainian and Thai men into investing in a real estate project in the province. However, he has not received any profits from the investment.
11 hours ago, snoop1130 said:However, Takhir, who was one of the project’s partners,
Was he an investor or partner. There is a difference. Perhaps he was both or he thought he was both.
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
29 minutes ago, Roo Island said:
How a liberal Harvard professor became Trump’s most distinguished defender on TV, freaked out his friends and got the legal world up in arms.
"liberal Harvard professor" He's still an intelligent man when it comes to law but I believe he is known more for constitutional law
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:
Do you have a link to that Comey quote?
Trump committed crimes and got convicted. It speaks volumes about you that you support a criminal.
I personally heard him say it during an interview while promoting his book. At the time i stated this was election interference. No one listened. a few years later I saw this
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1236006350395802
and since you asked that question I started to do a search for the video, there is loads of stuff but that exact video I don't have the time at the moment to search for. Possible later today.
-
1
-
1
-
-
14 hours ago, 2008bangkok said:
Amazing how these Thai men treat the women like they own them.
Somebody shagged my wife I'd just say fine you don't want me so I'll go.
And I would be very happy to be free from her! I have a thai girlfriend whom I care for dearly but if we ever break it off I will never have another girlfriend. I love my freedom.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Roo Island said:
Who was it? Where did you hear it. Otherwise, means nothing
Alan Dershowitz
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
3 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:That talking point was obviated during the closing arguments.
You Trump fans get your talking points from Trump, but he was sleeping during the trial, so he had no idea what was going on.
If you really want to know the specific charges, I will post them, but I suspect you don't care, you just need to feed your frustration about your Dear Leader being a felon.
Alan Dershowitz is whom I was mentioning, and I never said I was a Trump fan. I wasn't actually a big fan of the man, I think he failed at a few things and I wasn't going to vote for him.
"I didn't charge Ms. Clinton with a crime because I thought she was going to be the next president of the United States and my wife and daughter wanted her to be the next president of the United States." James Comey Ex-FBI Director
Fox News guest, "The verdict has handed Trump the election, people that were undecided will vote for Trump"
Now I damned well am going to vote for him. Unfortunately I have only one vote. I'm absolutely positive this farce of a trial has sealed many other votes for the man.
-
1
-
3
-
- Popular Post
On 5/31/2024 at 9:34 AM, Danderman123 said:What was the crime?
Just kidding 😂
I've been watching a well know American law expert on tv who was following the trial, he said the judge nor the prosecution couldn't define or accurately articulate what crime was committed.
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
7 hours ago, jacob29 said:
Not in itself illegal, I would wager a great number of shell companies exist, and not just in Thailand.
Citation? Employment agencies are very routine, found in all countries - they sit between employer and employee and skim a commission. It's a legitimate business, and the work permit is incidental to this operation.
What is illegal, is Thai nominee shareholders, and (where it applies) not actually employing four Thai employees per foreign work permit, not paying tax etc. In this case it sounds like the issue was Thai nominees, and potentially bogus Thai employees on payroll.
No more than two years ago I read an article written by a Thai legal expert about foreigners forming companies skirting the system with the sole purpose of buying land to live on. The article said a true company must have employees, actually doing some business and all the documents taxes etc that go with a true business. If the Thai government found the company wasn't a true business the foreigner could have his land taken.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, firemans35 said:
If I remember correctly technically each Thai shareholder is supposed to have a certain amount of money. I forget the exact amount but it was around 1,000,000 baht. I doubt this Thai has 270,000,000 but it's possible. No more than two years ago I read an article written by a Thai legal expert about foreigners forming companies skirting the system with the sole purpose of buying land to live on. The article said a true company must have employees, actually doing some business and all the documents taxes etc that go with a true business. If the Thai government found the company wasn't a true business the foreigner could have his land taken. Perhaps in the case of this article these companies were being formed with the sole purpose of skirting the immigration laws, the companied weren't a true business and were only formed to allow people to stay in Thailand.
Yeah I know my comment posted twice. I clicked submit but the was no action that let me know my comment posted.
-
19 hours ago, soi3eddie said:
...but gave no specific details in the story. Other than the business must not have more than 49% foreign ownership. A very greay area as to what is "fraudulent" or "bogus". The companies were formed as per the rules by all accounts (or they wouldn'y have been formed) but the authorities don't like it. OK the Thai lady has interests in 270 companies. Maybe she's just very successful. It is clear that "authorities" do not like what is happening but to call it "fraud" is a stretch. Who is actaullay being defrauded and losing their money? As usual the story is light on specifics.
If I remember correctly technically each Thai shareholder is supposed to have a certain amount of money. I forget the exact amount but it was around 1,000,000 baht. I doubt this Thai has 270,000,000 but it's possible. No more than two years ago I read an article written by a Thai legal expert about foreigners forming companies skirting the system with the sole purpose of buying land to live on. The article said a true company must have employees, actually doing some business and all the documents taxes etc that go with a true business. If the Thai government found the company wasn't a true business the foreigner could have his land taken. Perhaps in the case of this article these companies were being formed with the sole purpose of skirting the immigration laws, the companied weren't a true business and were only formed to allow people to stay in Thailand.
-
1
-
-
-
-
3 hours ago, Classic Ray said:
Statutes of limitation are usually applied to prevent ambushing defendants with surprises many years after an allegation.
If the legal action has already started before the limitation applies, there is no ambush and surely the case can proceed to verdict?
My thoughts also
-
Masked Gang Raid Brit’s Pattaya Home, Flee With ฿2m
in Thailand News - Discussion
Inside Job. The girlfriend may have told someone about the money maybe knowing what would happen maybe not knowing, someone at the bank was in on it or the Brit let it slip to someone he knows.