Jump to content

Disaantri

Member
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Disaantri

  1. Aye, but it's pretty obvious you ain't gonna get all those people hailing your desired outcome! It's like an aircraft captain flying to his clear destination, for which he sensibly has an alternative landing always planned; along the way, destination weather looks very unsettled, stormy, perhaps at very limits of his and/or aircraft's limits; he makes an assessment, choosing not to risk attempting the landing, and therefore decides to return to base, or fly to the safer alternate for the sake of ALL on board!

    • Thanks 1
  2. 10 minutes ago, nontabury said:

     

    You should visit areas  of the U.K where the importation of E.u nationals has drastically effected the lives and livelihoods of the indigenous people. 

     

    Do us a favour, and have a DNA test - you are probably more of Scandinavian, mainland and Mediterranean descent than you would hope to believe .... if you are lucky there may be some Celt in you! Indigenous peoples ......

    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
  3. 34 minutes ago, rocketman777 said:

    If there were to be a 2nd Referendum the questions should be:

     

    A  Leave the EU with Mays Deal

    B  Leave the EU under World trade rules.

     

    If so, how do you propose to remain committed to the GFA, maintain a border, probably be forced to agree tarrif-free trade WTO, thus losing any competetive advantage with other countries on leaving the EU, and the disadvantage to our agri-food and farming sector competing in the EU CAP subsidised sector?

    • Like 1
  4. The plus sign '+' character is designed to indicate that the international dialling number must be inserted, followed by country number and then the individual telephone number less the first '0'. On a smart phone, using the '+' will obviate the need to insert those pesky little numbers yourself (as different countries / operators may do different numbers than the standard '00'), as you travel the world. Glad to have got that off my chest.

    • Like 1
  5. There were no written rules for departing the EU; we're all making it up as we go along! Fair enough, the 27 demand the 4 principles - but that imposes the hard border if there's no deal.

     

    To treat UK as some sort of villain here seems harsh, they are unlikely to abandon all standards adopted over the last 40 years. You may of course wish to deter others from leaving, but it hardly opens the door for UK to want to change its mind later, which is what a club would normally suggest, so as to keep its coffers full.

     

    The quote of the bar bill analogy - usual club custom is to insist members pay for drinks consumed, not those in the barrel or in the delivery van.

     

    So to break the impasse, perhaps the logical geographical (sorry Scotland) Irish unification, with the EU funding the resettlement in GB of all those wishing to leave (DUP and the like). Then back to island mentality, each with internationally accepted coastal fishery protections. WTO tarrifs unless a better deal can be negotiated, to save dragging all this out for another 2 years .....

     

    And before you demand recognition of all those lives lost in the past, remember those from years gone by - recent Boer wars, Middle East wars - always in the end you must move on, not hark to the past - sure learn from the past, but move on.

  6. Think you all missed the goal of  Baldrick's cunning plan ..... by the time we re-apply to join we'll be slimmer, and even meaner, gdp and gbp will plummet and so we will eventually become a net gainer rather a net contributor even taking into account the loss of all the present rebates which Mr Barnier would insist upon us losing! Win-win?

    • Haha 1
  7. 14 minutes ago, HalfLight said:

    I wonder what the 'Prince Harry.' thing is useful for - apart from as a distraction. As for leaving history lessons to others, I haven't always felt this way but those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. I can't remember who said that but it seems sensible.

     

     

    Just that as a leader I would expect him to know the significance and hurt it might cause, whereas I would not expect that of such a teenager

  8. Kerikey, we are so full of ourselves pontificating behind keyboards. This was a silly mistake by a teenager unaware of the significance, not as bad perhaps as Prince Harry who wore the symbol and who, as a member of the establishment and later an officer in the Army, should have known better.

     

    Teach kids to respect one another, live harmoniously .... leave the history learning to those who want to be politicians and leaders .... it is they who motivate peoples into committing such crimes associated with symbols.


×
×
  • Create New...