.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Sujo
-
Posts
7,955 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Sujo
-
-
- Popular Post
Another trump lie. Will bring troops home but is doing everything he can to keep them in iraq. Threatening to freeze irq bank accounts if they force US out.
Hey trump, doesnt a country have a right to decide who it wants in its country?
On top of that lie. He has stated only 2% of asylum seekers show up for court. Fact, 99% showed up.
https://www.vox.com/2020/1/10/21059924/trump-asylum-seekers-show-up-court-hearing
-
6
-
2
-
- Popular Post
2 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:LOL.
The Dems been wasting soooooo much taxpayers money on Trump witch hunts for past 3 years, and you are worried about a bit more.
No. Trump has obstructed for 3 years. He is the cause of the waste. All he had to do was allow witnesses and provide documents that prove his perfect call.
The dems have wasted nothing. They are obliged to do their constitutional duty.
As are the senate who will swear an oath to be fair and impartial.
What are you afraid of.
-
2
-
1
-
3
-
1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:
Perhaps to drive the Dems crazy. Seems to be working.
Sso you are happy he is wasting taxpayers money.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:
Those in the Washington bubble may think that a good idea, but I'll warrant the voters may have a different opinion.
Why would it matter what you think voters will do. What matters is they do their constitutional duty.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:
Who's truth? I suspect the "truth" Dems will accept is not what the GOP will accept.
Far as I can see, the anti Trumpers have determined that he is guilty, even if nothing so far has been found that would warrant a conviction.
It doesnt matter qho will or wont accept it. If you wont call witnesses you are hiding the truth. The public deserves to know.
I also see hannity has threatened to release the phone numbers of any senator that calls for witnesses.
Repubs are very afraid and the public deserves to know why.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
39 minutes ago, Longcut said:
But, he will be cleared by enough to win re-election.
Do you want to know the truth?
-
2
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, seajae said:
you mean like the dems already did to start the impeachment
You mean like congress does not do a trial, only investigation. The trial in the senate is to be fair and balanced. Thats the iath senators must take.
Thought based reasoning is not strong for trump supporters.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
40 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:Amybody paying attention knew trump had a chance electorally.
Which was what the polls indicated.
-
2
-
1
-
His complaint was already verified by testimony by those he said knew about it. His complaint was what people told him, they confirmed they told him. He can add nothing.
whether what they told him is true is a separate issue.
-
2
-
-
11 hours ago, Longcut said:
I must clarify. He doesn't need them for the Senate trial. He will be cleared by the Senate.
Which doesnt mean he will be cleared by the voting public. Do you want to know the truth?
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, bristolboy said:
In other words, your claim that the House Democrats were not doing legislating is BS.
As usual. Facts to trump supporters are kryptonite.
-
1
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
22 minutes ago, stevenl said:Please show us a source of 'many Europeans killed by Iranians'.
all you will hear is crickets.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 minutes ago, Matzzon said:Hell yeah, but it has nothing to do with the states. This is just something that is very common in the population of certain countries.
Like the US that shot down a commercial flight?
-
3
-
1
-
- Popular Post
8 minutes ago, Kelsall said:Pelosi caved.
"The speaker got nothing in return for her decision to end the holdout. Back on Dec. 18, the night the House impeached the president, Pelosi said she would not send the articles until she received some assurance that the Senate trial would be 'fair.'"
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/pelosi-caves
She will pass impeachment to the senate when she knows the rules of the trial so she can appoint managers.
She also got moscow mitch to change from saying no witnesses and dead on arrival to consider witnesses.
As per the oath he takes to be fair.
Do you want to know if the president is corrupt or not. Or is your mind made up.
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Kelsall said:Same polls that predicted Hillary would win.
No polls predicted hilary would win. Polls dont predict. But im sure you and trump use them if in your favor.
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
1 minute ago, Ireland32 said:
Yes all Persians hate their govt
Well yes. Have met many iranians in malaysia. Have also been to iran. Never hear the iranians say they like their leaders. It is a nice country and the people are indeed nice.
-
2
-
-
17 minutes ago, claynlr said:
I really don’t get some TVF posters. Of course I don’t know what your home country is but I know Europe and Britain have had many deaths of their citizens from extremists, many Muslim and many directed by Iran.
As far as the US, the Democrats would blame Trump no matter what the issue is.Whho were the extremists murderers directed by iran?
-
2
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 minutes ago, claynlr said:The Iranians have killed many of their own citizens, and I can promise you they don’t give one hoot about the lost Canadians. You can’t take a western “There’s no earthly reason why the Iranians would do that” attitude.
What a load of rubbish. To use your words, how can you possibly know iranians dont give one hoot about the lost canadians,or anyone else for that matter. Your extremist vitriol is showing.
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
9 minutes ago, Just Weird said:
I agree with you, but that's just not the case when diplomatic immunity is concerned, morality doesn't come into it, whether we like it or not.
He was not a diplomat. He was an intelligence officer which gives priveleges under the geneva convention but a diplomat he was not. It is not clear if his wife has any such immunity under her husbands privilege.
But. She certainly does not have diplomatic immunity in the US, she can only claim that in UK. So she should be brought to court to argue she is entitled during extradition proceedings.
Edit: immunity is for the uk to give, not the US to say it is.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, Longcut said:Really? Then why was he not allowed to call the so-called Whistleblower?
Because both dems and repubs agree that whistleblowers should be protected. Also all claims made by him have been testified to by others. So his evidence cannot advance the matter.
Also, repubs spent months saying it was hearsay, not even 3rd hand. So if its that bad why call him.
-
2
-
2
-
1 minute ago, Longcut said:
Joe Biden
Relevant how?
Did trump call him and ask him to investigate himself. Was he in on the calls. Was he in on the meetings?
The investigation is about what trump did. So anyone witness to that is relevant.
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Longcut said:Doesn't need them.
Then if he wont have witnesses to clear him he can stop crying about the process.
It could have been over on day 1. But its dragged on because of his obstruction. So he can stop complaining about it.
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Longcut said:The House Democrats didn't allow the Republican side of the House to call any witnesses. Why should the Republican Senate allow it then?
Name 1 witness relevant to the investigation the dems refused to call.
Better yet, name 1 witness the whitehouse allowed to give evidence.
You do know the difference between an investigation and a trial dont you?
-
2
-
1
-
10 minutes ago, rabas said:
So finally, to get Trump, you accept the deep state.
The agreement was working and Iran was compliant in the same way people are safe if drivers are compliant with 300 mph speed limits posted on the highway.
The agreement did little to deter Iran's near future capability to become a powerful nuclear state. They could keep their uranium enrichment industry intact, improve it, and as I posted several times, in October 2018 they completed factory to mass produce large numbers of new more powerful centrifuges. This would reduce their breakout time to a few months and they could shortly be producing a bomb every few weeks.
They were fully compliant. And now there is nothing to deter them and they are increasing enrichment.
So are we safer with iran before or after trump.
I think you need a comprehension lesson as to my post about deep state.
'Disastrous mistake': Iran acknowledges shooting down Ukrainian airliner
in World News
Posted
Lucky we had the guy invent venetian blinds otherwise it would be curtains for all of us.
Very sad it was shot down. As the US always says, bad things happen in conflicts, then they wash their hands clean of it.