
James105
-
Posts
2,692 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by James105
-
-
2 hours ago, WDSmart said:
1. If common sense and practicality are used, that would be a first! I do like your suggestion that testing only be done if a competitor (or coach?) challenges an athlete. Testing for a Y chromosome would be the likely test. That would mean a lack of one would be a "woman," and the presence of one would be a "man" - except for people with XXY chromosomes. That would either disqualify them from women's sports or necessitate the creation of a special rule for them.
2. Lack of a Y chromosome would certainly qualify someone as a woman, but the presence of a Y chromosome might not (XXY). And would men's sports require a Y chromosome if tested, or would anyone be allowed to compete?
Thanks...If you think some kind of test needs to take place to know if Mr Thomas should or should not be competing against women may I suggest you visit Specsavers. Also, the doctor records it on the birth certificate when they observe the sex at birth and since that cannot change then this will be sufficient when they register for the competitive sport they wish to participate in. "But what if someone fakes their birth certificate". That is cheating and fraud and should be punished accordingly.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, rickudon said:
Yes, look at big oil. Just like the tobacco companies before them.
I am not panicking. There is very little risk of humanity being wiped out by climate change. There is a big risk that a lot of people will live in a degraded environment and migration will become such a problem that today's migration issues will seem trivial. There is a chance we will see resource wars - water, maybe food, maybe just better territory.
When the Indian sub-continent runs out of all those things, do you think people will just sit down and die? The second half of this century will be a bad time; the 22nd century, no idea, could get better or worse. I just want my kids to be on the winning side.
So you think that by paying extra tax to subsidize the green billionaires and being forced to restrict your own lifestyle in some way would change any of that?
Climate panickers have no imagination. They seem to think that the technology we have today is all we will ever have to solve problems. 100 years ago they would think the giant telephone in peoples houses had peaked and could not imagine ever making a phone call untethered from a house or a phone box, let alone having a computer in their pockets that has more processing power than NASA used for the moon landings. Everyone wants cleaner skies and when the technology evolves to make that happen people will choose to buy it. It will happen naturally. I object to subsidizing inefficient provision of energy so politicians, China and rich people can get richer.
-
1
-
-
12 hours ago, rickudon said:
Thats the thing, climate change is a mesh of competing factors, some positive, some negative. 60 years ago we just didn't have enough data
Climate changes over millions of years. To rely on (probably) manipulated data over the last few decades and then use that to model what is going to happen in 100 years (despite admitting the data wasn't good enough 60 years ago), to draw conclusions on such a small data set is quite the leap of faith in the climate alarmist community. There was a record breaking heat wave in the 70s. There will probably be less warm summers in the next decade. It's called weather. Something humans have notoriously never been able to accurately predict even in the next day or 2 let alone 100 years which is why all these climate predictions have been wildly wrong and will continue to be so.
You would have been panicking (if you were around) about the upcoming ice age in the 70s. Now you are panicking about global warming. Some people are just very weak to propaganda. Which is great for the rich and the powerful as they rely on you (and people like you) to keep spreading this propaganda to keep them rich.
12 hours ago, rickudon said:You have to get at the underlying facts.
Yes, follow the money.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, rickudon said:
Yes, natural climate change does happen very, very slowly. What we see now is a speeded up version where things happen in 100 years instead of thousands.
100 years you say? We only just escaped an ice age a mere 50 years ago so yes it does seem that climate scam changes super fast. It's warming now you say? It's a scam. Follow the money.
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, rickudon said:
Sad to see that 90% of posters either do not believe in man made climate change or just do not care.
The reason most don't believe it is the climate has changed many times on this planet before man existed and will continue to do so. Climate change is real and happening (very, very, very slowly just as it always has done) and pretending that we are responsible for it is a King Canute level of hubris. The only thing "man made" is the desire to profit and have the gullible pay the powerful who make money from the fear mongering. The rich and the powerful are grateful for your contribution to their cause of making more and more money.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
19 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:You can't hide the truth forever.
I hope the Brits will pay reparations or compensation. 👍
...and the Romans should pay compensation to Britain yes?
Or would that be silly as no-one in Britain or Australia today is suffering the effects of being conquered by a superior force (as all nations have on this planet) and since time travel is still impossible there isn't anything anyone can do to change it. Perhaps they (and you) should grow up and make the best of things as they are today and be grateful for the infrastructure those superior conquering forces provided.
-
1
-
2
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, The Cyclist said:I almost had a lapse where I sort of started to feel sorry for her, then I remembered she lied to get a position she is so clearly not qualified for and is completely out of her depth. I do feel sorry for her victims though, such as the farmer who killed himself so she couldn't get her money grabbing hands on the farm he wanted to pass down to his kids, or the pensioners who died before their time after the winter fuel payment cuts, or others who have and will suffer greatly due to her incompetence. I didn't see her shed any tears when she was inflicting harm onto others so if she is suffering then she probably needs to point the finger of blame at karma for that.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2epp4nyz8o
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
2 hours ago, Red Forever said:
Starmer was indeed head of CPS but the Savile file never crossed his desk
That's exactly what I said. The Saville file "never crossed his desk" (nudge, nudge, wink, wink). Fascinating how the highest of high profile nonces did not make it onto the desk of the head of the CPS, some would suggest it's simply unbelievable. Boris was a liar but Starmer is objectively more of a liar. Ask the WASPI women, the pensioners, the working people, the farmers, the disabled, the businesses (small and large), his own party and the lies he told to get the leadership of the party, the parents of kids who expected him to abolish the 2 child cap, the IFS and the "black hole". I can't actually think of a single thing that he has said that is even close to the truth - can you?
As he has such a penchant for lying, I simply don't believe the Saville file didn't cross his desk, not for a nanosecond. If you are gullible enough to believe him about this then perhaps you might be interested in purchasing some land on the moon I have for sale...
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
One of the bees has been found impersonating a police officer.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
3 hours ago, The Cyclist said:
Criminal damage being charged under Terrorism offences = Auto D Notice.
Lord Alli is obviously just a very nice and very benevolent chap 😀😀
The chances of this being terrorism is about as likely as some far right thuggery occurring because of incitement by a Lucy Connolly tweet. If Saville got a free pass for noncery under his "leadership" in the CPS, then I tend to wonder if he has an Epstein style black book containing the activities of other deviants in positions of power that also coincidentally "didn't come across his desk". Just speculation of course as I find it difficult to comprehend how someone so devoid of personality and competence has managed to leverage himself into such a position of power. It would be incredibly difficult (outside of Glastonbury of course) to find anyone, literally anyone, less competent than this moron.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:Like you, I am disappointed about much of Starmer's first year, but unlike you I'd quite like to see Rayner taking over. However, I don't think it will happen, unless the polls are still bad in 2027/2028.
Labour do not have female PMs as they are a bunch of hypocrites. If Starmer goes he will be replaced with a white man.
That said, they might have already had their first gay PM, but the media seems to be sitting on (or prevented from) investigating why exactly 3 rent boys set about setting fire to his properties, or why lord Alli was plying him with gifts. So that would be something that they can hold over the Tories if that ever actually get made public. Fascinating how we had weeks of 24/7 news coverage about Boris eating a cake on his birthday, yet there is complete silence on Starmer with a far more intriguing scandal. It could make someone wonder just how many cases (of a Saville nature) he must have covered up or sat on when he was director of CPS to have such influence over what the media chooses to focus on or getting judges to issue D notices.
-
1
-
4
-
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Refreshing to once again have a PM who abides by court rulings, don’t you agree?
Did you need that court ruling to find out what a woman was too? Bless.
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Hamus Yaigh said:Labeling Ofcom as “extreme leftist” or accusing it of “pushing the trans agenda” ignores the regulator’s legal obligation to uphold impartiality across contentious issues, including gender identity and climate change.
You have this incorrect. Ofcom considers "climate alarmism" as a settled scientific issue so does not require balance from the broadcasters to provide the opposing view. They consider whether or not a woman can actually have a penis as a "not settled" issue so require broadcasters to provide an alternative view. So if someone says "women cannot have a penis" on TV then they have to provide some fantasist on to say that women can indeed, have a penis.
The supreme court settled this. Ofcom should not encourage law breaking by having people on TV who suggest its fine for men to compete in women's sports or use women's single sex spaces.
-
3
-
1
-
54 minutes ago, GarryP said:
I hope so. We do need change but Farage is about as trustworthy as a wet fart or a punctured condom. Perhaps, if it was under the leadership of someone that can be trusted, then it would be a good choice. But otherwise, it is all bluster.
So the Tories have proven that they cannot be trusted, and Labour are presiding over the worst and most detested government since records began, raising taxes, borrowing even more, lowering growth, increasing illegal immigration and now have a puppet as the PM who cannot implement changes despite the large majority. I suspect actual headless chickens would not have fared any worse. You think voting for either of these imbecilic parties again is a better option? Crikey.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, Baht Simpson said:Your view that he was a political prisoner has no basis in fact. He was segregated to protect him.
"Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was placed in segregation in prison primarily for his own safety and to prevent potential harm to other inmates. He was initially held in Belmarsh prison and later moved to Woodhill after expressing a conflict with followers of Islam, which led to threats against him. The prison administration deemed segregation necessary due to concerns about his safety and the potential for violence from other prisoners, particularly those with opposing views. "
Source: Google
18% of prisoners are muslim. Since the religion of peace is not the religion of peace (a fact that Tommy Robinson has been stating for 2 decades now) he cannot be amongst the muslim prisoners as they will probably kill him since they are, you know, so peaceful. Contempt of court is a non violent civil offense and the sentence should have been carried out in an low security or open prison with other non-violent offenders where he would not have needed to be segregated and suffered the inhumane conditions of solitary confinement for such a long time. Pretending to yourself that this kind of sentence and this kind of inhumane punishment is normal doesn't make it reality.
Anyway 2-tier justice has once again been confirmed in the UK. The mental gymnastics required to pretend this is not happening could start to cause brain hemorrhages so try and be careful.
-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:The election isn’t due for another 4 years.
Time one would think for Reform to come up with some actual coatings for their basket of easy promises.
Reform have pledged to make big savings on the net zero scam and deporting illegal immigrants and also stopping the invasion of illegal immigrants. If they have any sense then they will also remove any and all benefits for all foreign nationals that have not made at least 10 years worth of contributions. Thats a lot of savings potentially.
Labour had 14 years to prepare for this and have demonstrably failed to manage the cost of their promises, kept or unkept, in their manifesto. They are taxing more and spending more (causing lower growth) than the last government and since they only are able to attract the adult equivalent of student activists into the party they are finding it impossible to make the needed cuts.
Why do you hold Reform to a higher standard than Labour?
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
18 hours ago, Social Media said:As LGBTQ+ media outlets like Gay Times fight to survive in an increasingly hostile environment
Being gay these days is an accepted norm (muslim countries excepted of course). It's not "hostile" and because it is so normalized the "gay times" would be just as relevant as the "left handed times" if it existed. If they jumped on the trans bandwagon then they only have themselves to blame as a movement that cheats at sport, mutilates kids and invades womens spaces was only ever going to have a short lifetime.
They were probably popular as they existed in a time before gay rights existed in the west. Maybe they should start again in the middle east to replicate their past success.
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
4 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:
If anything i admired the Cameron / Osbourne government for actually trying to make an attempt at cutting spending, but ultimately it was all very minor again. Eventually someone is going to have to speak seriously to the population, explain you cannot get everything, and major cuts will have to be made.
Yes I remember this and the incessant wailing from the left. People don't want to vote for a party that promise to make cuts to wasteful spending (that Tory government being the obvious exception), they vote for those who promise to spend yet more money that far outweighs the tax income. Reform also seem to be falling into this trap as it is the only way to gain power. It's quite frankly a fundamental problem with a democratic system where people vote for what they can get for themselves rather than what is beneficial for the wider country as a whole and/or the future generations.
Maybe it's time to embrace a cold and calculating AI to run the country that cannot be swayed by the whingeing and that does not pander to those who contribute the least, and cannot be bribed by lobbyists or self interested parties. That's not a serious point, but the way the UK has been run for the last few decades is clearly unsustainable and I have no doubt an IMF bailout is on the cards before too long along that comes with crippling and forced cuts to every single welfare system.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, Social Media said:The government is now expected to preserve personal independence payments for existing claimants, walking back a proposal that would have removed benefits from hundreds of thousands of disabled people.
They don't call him 2 tier Keir for nothing. He has now found a way for 2 people with the exact same disability to not receive the same help. What an imbecile. Any half decent lawyer will be rubbing their hands at taking the government to court due to the obvious unfairness of this proposal so it's a shame that Labour don't have a single half decent lawyer in their ranks who could foresee this coming down the line.
There was a much simpler solution to this. Don't give these payments for "mental health" conditions such as anxiety and depression (the UK is apparently the only country that gives money as a disability payment for mental health conditions) which is apparently 40% of disability payments and immediately stop paying any benefits to any foreign national who does not have 10 years contributions to the system.
-
2
-
3
-
2
-
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:Is it still Labours thinking that white girls that are gang raped by muslims in Britain should "shut their mouths for the sake of diversity"?
Lord knows how any decent human could support such evil, and go on to stalk and wage lawfare on the extremely brave journalist that forced this issue to be known.
I find it quite confounding that leftists appease muslims. In general terms (not all muslims disclaimer etc) they are the farthest of far-right of any community in the UK and every poll indicates they are homophobic, misogynistic and women subjugating community. Some have been committing organised rape against a specific race of underage girls for decades and the "community" has been at best silent about it or at worst participating or been complicit in it. Some are openly racist with their hatred towards Jews, are responsible for the vast majority of terrorist attacks in the west and are highly over represented in prison making up 18% of the prison population when they make up just 6.5% of the UK.
No other group would get away with what they are able to with such impunity.
-
2
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
2 hours ago, newbee2022 said:
Ridiculous post.
"One can only imagine how much worse their lives would have been had their ancestors not been slaves"
Not being exploited, not being robbed, not being slaves they would have had all opportunities to develop in their own culture.
So when they were freed, why didn't they go back to their "own cultures" to the land of the people that actually sold them as slaves in the first place? Nobody was forcing them to stay in the rich and prosperous western countries at that point, but they probably didn't want to as they would have just been sold as slaves to countries not controlled by the British empire had they returned. Slavery existed for thousands of years before the west indulged in this practice and was the first (in the case of the UK) to abolish it.
Anyway, you clearly feel guilty about this so I'll set up a Gofundme for those who feel guilty about it and wish to donate. It will be called "Reparations from people who never owned slaves to people who never have been slaves". Can I count on you donating some of your own money to this?
-
1
-
-
20 hours ago, newbee2022 said:
They have all rights to demand reparations.
And it's easy to find out who got the most profit out of slavery.
And those are entitled to pay some billions.
Those who did well out of slavery were the ancestors of freed slaves themselves. Instead of having to live in poor countries (whose leaders actually sold their ancestors into slavery in the first place) get to live and prosper in richer western countries. One can only imagine how much worse their lives would have been had their ancestors not been slaves. How much do you think the ancestors of the slaves should have to pay for this gift? Considering it cost the British taxpayer (in todays money) over £16bn to end slavery, perhaps there should be an "ancestor of slave tax" which could be used to pay reparations to the British people who shouldered the burden of paying to end slavery as a starting point.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:
You cannot force the boats back.
What you can do is declare it an issue of National security under the National Security Act.
Give the Military £10 million to build secure tented camps on Military training areas.
Armed Military pick them on the beach, transport to secure tented camp, given slops 3 times a day, and here they stay until they beg to go home.
No hotels, no cash cards, nothing. Only security , safety, fed and watered, provided by armed guards
It's (kind of) been tried with Bibby Stockholm.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4ng711yy2yo
"She said a large number of the migrants had boycotted their breakfast and lunch, and had taken part in a two-hour sit-in at the site's outside compound."
The eventual rewards are too great for them to go home. They have to be turned back before they get to the UK. It's the only way. Australia did it and solved the problem within a few weeks.
-
18 hours ago, Tiger1980 said:
Unfortunately you are wrong on one point, nearly 50% of asylum claims are accepted, those who fail the initial application then go on to appeal ( at a high cost to the tax payer) of these approximately 50% are successful so the full figure is a 75% acceptance rate.
Yes, well I think I can guess why so many that should not be granted are successful
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg8emkley3o
-
1
-
1
-
Corbyn and Sultana Launch New Hard-Left Party to Challenge Labour
in World News
Posted
So Labour have lost the pensioners, the farmers, the middle class parents who sent kids to private school, the small/large businesses, the white working class, the disabled, the trans and now they have lost the muslims and the Anti-Semitic jew haters on the left who will now go to the Jamas party (I presume it will be named after one terrorist group or another). And they are going to raise taxes in the autumn, probably penalizing the people who work hard and pay tax, which is when they lose the rest of the middle class, even the ones who go to Glastonbury.
This will drop Labour to around about 16-18% which is basically the public sector workers giving them about 40-50 seats. Enjoy the demise of the UK whilst you can UK haters, as this nightmare is going to end in 2029.