Jump to content

Mayhem11

Member
  • Posts

    307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mayhem11

  1. I don’t understand why Covid testing is the mark of good management. That is simply part of a narrative that also requires masks, hand washing and social distancing.  Time and time again people who tested negative are later tested positive. Testing is just a point in time event.  It is not predictive of infection rates.  The real test of infection or circulation rates is not an isolated test. It is hospitalisation and death rates. 

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
  2. The test of whether something is defamatory and valid defences to defamation varies from country to country. In Australia the defence is truth and public interest. I doubt if anyone really knows whether the gent on Koh Chang was lying or not. If he was truth saying, it is in the public interest to know of this interesting case from Koh Chang. 
     

    I do know from personal experience that Thai hotels misrepresent their amenities.  But what recourse is there if you have been flimflammed?
     

    I applaud Trip Advisor for its stance on the matter. It is a pity that Booking.com does not have the same courage.

     

     

    • Like 2
  3. 14 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

    His creditors will immediately start foreclosures, they want their money out before the Federal and State Governments take it all.

     

    This is the start of stripping away the facade of lies and fakery that is Donald Trump, it’s going to leave an awful lot of people with nowhere to hide from the fact that he’s conned them. 

     

     

     

     

     

    14 hours ago, alianware said:

    Stupid !! 

    If trump goes to jail than biden and family, hillary-clinton's family and and all the companies behind will also go to jail. 

    Dont be stupid !!! 

    Scotty please beam this fatuous boof head up and spirit him of to the planet in your dreams.

    • Haha 1
  4. 5 hours ago, donnacha said:


    I see. So, it would be better for the office of the President of the United States of America if the president does not deny accusations of rape from random people?
     


    Their position was that the accusation would clearly not have been made if he was not in that job.

    It is the same as death threats against the president. They spend tens of millions every year evaluating and investigating the roughly one thousand death threats per month that every president receives. The supposed "most powerful man in the world" draws a lot of attention from kooks, regardless of who is actually in the office.

    Elderly white upper class women feel bitterly aggrieved that this particular president beat their great hope, Hillary, so, it is natural that some would go kamikaze. Fortunately, nothing has come out of any of the allegations, not contemporaneous notes by the alleged victims, not even witnesses who saw them together. Remarkable when you consider how famous he was even then and how this particular incident is alleged to have happened in a busy department store.

    So, yes. If you suffer an attack due to the office you hold, your employer has a duty to defend you.

     

    Wow one bitter chappie are you. Just one legal issue. An employer is not obliged to defend a criminal act such as rape or defamation. Such slight of hand to suggest there is any comparison between an employer and an employee and a politician.

    • Like 1
  5. 8 hours ago, FlyingThai said:

    When was that? 70 years ago?

    Spot on. Kids being whacked on their bare bums by a teacher in front of a class is more like Dicken’s 19th century England than a real memory. The fact that the contributor remembers this is a testament to the long term traumatic impact of such barbarism. It did not “scar him” is absolute baloney. This type of mind wants birch beatings brought back. Go and get some good psychotherapy and don’t forget to take your tablets before commenting on this forum.

    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
  6. 20 minutes ago, mark131v said:

    I wonder how high up this came from, I reckon pressure has been applied onto the hotel to try and make this go away, problem is damage has been done and the world has now become privy to Thailand's little man control laws!!

     

    Reckon they deserve whatever they get, any hotel that get's a guest jailed for posting 4 negative review's of which the main one they are whining about was never published don't deserve to stay in the hospitality business, complete knobs all around...

    Hear hear. 

    • Like 2
  7. It is without a doubt an extremely disturbing story. The usual approach to a bad review is to respond on the site where it is made. I can only hope that the tourist does not settle by paying this hotel some money, or that the Judge throws it out. It is clearly a waste of the Court’s time. I will follow this case with great interest.

     

    i also think that this Koh Chang hotel needs to be named and shamed. 

×
×
  • Create New...