Jump to content

Smigel

Member
  • Posts

    85
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Smigel

  1. 1 hour ago, earlinclaifornia said:

    Do you read your own posts? I think you are seriously deluded

    1000USD I can have a third party hold both of bet and release to the winner.

    Have you been at the sherry Earl .? Saying that you are seriously deluded is not calling you a name, it's a comment regarding your mental state. 

    So I can see the stake is 1000 usd

    I also asked you what the terms were. 

    I ask that because with mail in voting I cannot see any way that the result is going to be known on Nov 3. 

    Add to that the fact that Hillary and the 600 or so lawyers will not allow Biden to concede under any circumstances. 

    The Democrats are also pushing the narrative that Trump will refuse to leave the White House. 

    There are many scenarios that could play out here. 

    The legitimacy of the declared winner could drag on for months. 

    Over to you. 

  2. 3 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

    66% Republicans in 2016 thought the SC was a most important reason voting. If he uses as a bargaining chip before his election instead of waiting he blows his wad.

    So 66% of Republicans in 2016 thought that a republican president nomination for the vacant seat on the SC, was the most important reason voting republican in that election. 

    That certainly does Not mean that those 66% of republican voters are single issue voters and they are not going to bother voting in this election because Trump has already had 2 nominations. 

    If that's the extent of your conviction for a Biden victory, I think you are seriously deluded. 

    Look you are obviously an American citizen living in America, so I wouldn't presume to tell you what's going on in your own country, but I refuse to believe your contention that if Trump and the senate go ahead with filling this vacancy, then republican voters will not bother to turn out, 

    Sorry, but that to me is a ludicrous suggestion, particularly in this election, where there are many highly emotive and contentious issues at stake. 

     

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Sujo said:

    A couple of points.

     

    The grand jury only hears evidence from the prosecutor. No defence allowed. The prosecutor stated walker shot the officer but the defence after seeing the report questions the ballistic report as non conclusive, but cannot tell the grand jury.

    Do you have a link for your post, the op clearly states Sargeant Manningly was shot in the thigh. 

    Something not right here. 

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Mama Noodle said:

    Anywho, Louisville getting the full BLM treatment right now. Riots, fires, organized antifa presence... 

     

    Real awesome. 

    You have to feel for the Louisville residents. 

    Hopefully now that the facts of the case have been revealed, and yet again the MSM and the left are shown up for the race baiting, anarchy agitators they are, this converts into more votes for Trump. 

     

    • Like 2
  5. 1 hour ago, earlinclaifornia said:

    Apparently this all is a bit over you head I think. Now that he will have the SC completed, he has accomplished the task. Are you believing that he will garner a "thank you" vote? Hardly, deal is done, bye-bye.

    I think there are 3 possible scenarios here. 

    1) I am as you suggest thick as mince. 

    2) English is not your first language. 

    3) You are in fact Joe Biden commenting under a pseudonym. 

    The reason I say this is because your post is utter jibberish. 

    Are you inferring that Trumps sole purpose of running for president in 2016 was because he knew back then that he would get the opportunity to nominate 3 candidates for the SC. 

    That the reason why people voted for him was because they wanted 3 Conservative leaning justices on the SC, and if Trump completes that task before the election then they don't need to vote for him. 

    I look forward to your reply, if only to confirm its not scenario 1).

    • Thanks 1
  6. 6 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

    It is truly accurate elections have consequences and make me wonder why trump is to not playing this smarter. Once this is played he has no real leverage or reason to have any reelection support. He is spent and they are exhausted.

    Please explain how he could play it smarter. 

    He is already taking the opportunity that has presented itself, by installing another Conservative on the SC. 

    The Dems made a mistake in 2016 by not pushing for RBG to retire in her early to mid eighties, they arrogantly believed Clinton was a shoe in. There is no way Trump will pass this opportunity up, and why should he.? 

    There is also the threat of the 600 or so lawyers the Dems have recruited to tie up this election in litigation, just in case they don't quite pull off their election fraud. 

    A 6-3 majority on the SC will be vital. 

    As for having no re election support, are you serious? 

    I suggest you take a look at the support he's getting at his rallies. 

    Do they look like they're not turning out to vote to you.? 

    I guess you're going to have to burn it all down.! 

    Good luck with that. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. 1 hour ago, RANGER55 said:

    Well, one thing for sure. A whole lot of people have had their fill of California and NY. Read an article last week that said that one of the major problems was you can't find enough U-Haul trucks to move. They are all left in Texas and other states east. No ones stupid enough to rent one and come back to California. Except maybe illegals crossing form Mexico and your super rich geeks in Silicon Valley that live in those gated communities with private security.

    Who can blame them, cheaper property, better standard of living with up to 60% lower cost of living. 

    The icing on the cake being escaping from lib policies that ruin life for many. 

    As I understand it though many texans are none too happy about it, particularly if they bring their Liberal views with them. 

    • Haha 2
  8. On 9/14/2020 at 1:18 PM, candide said:

    Which is exactly what you are doing (repeating it over and over again to make it truth).

    You will not find any quote from Pelosi or Biden mentioning the CHINA travel ban, nor saying that the WHO showed no evidence etc....

    BTW are you aware that it's Trump who downplayed the epidemic, stating that Dems were creating panic?

    I beg to differ, both Biden and Pelosi labelled Trumps ban on travel from China and slightly later the EU, xenophobic. 

    Pelosi openly encouraged travel to Chinatown, proclaiming it perfectly safe to do so. 

    Why are you openly lying.? 

  9. 1 hour ago, Morch said:

     

    Your opinion is not fact. You do not speak for any "we".

    Unless by "we" you meant hardcore-Trump-supporters, then no, then "we" don't universally "know" what you claimed.

    You should try taking a look on the Internet, there are lots of examples of creepy Joe, sticking his face and hands over young kids and refusing to let go. The sheer look of terror on some of the kids faces is unnerving to say the least. 

    Even the parents faces show a degree of concern, but are too scared to say anything. 

    • Like 1
    • Confused 2
    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...