- Popular Post
Smigel
-
Posts
85 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Smigel
-
-
10 hours ago, Isaan sailor said:
Hunter Biden, a fine, outstanding American—NOT.
His father seems to think so.
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
On 10/15/2020 at 2:24 PM, Sujo said:No they are censoring it because its unconfirmed, unverified, well its pretty much been debunked.
Perhaps heed intelligence agencies reports that russia is meddling.
Yet your quite happy and accepting of the obviously fake story regarding Trump calling military personnel
"suckers and losers" from ahem "anonamous sources".
Yet more hipocrasy from the anti trumpers, who'd a thunk it.!
- 2
- 2
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
51 minutes ago, newnative said:Yesterday I posted that Trump's modus operandi is to repeat a lie over and over again and eventually some will be brainwashed into actually believing the lie is true. Exhibit A here with you parroting Trump's often repeated lie regarding mail-in voter fraud. Hope the Kool-Aid was tasty. (Trump condemns mail-in voting but always votes by mail himself, talk about a fraud.)
Unfortunate that you used 'flip flops' in your post. Right now we are witnessing the largest mass political flip flop in history. I'm speaking, of course, of all the Republican senators who in 2016 declared that no Supreme Court vacancy should ever be filled in a Presidential election year. Fast forward to 2020 and all these Republican hypocrites have flip flopped.
What is it that you don't understand about 2016 whereby the Democrats held the White House (Obama) but not the Senate ( republican). Fast forward four years, now the white House is republican (Trump), oh look the Senate is also republican.
Ergo the president can move to nominate a SC Justice, to fill a vacancy as the constitution requires him to do.
Do you see how it works.?
Furthermore on the subject of hypocrisy, do you also recall 4 years ago when Obama, Biden and the rest of the Democrats were calling on the Senate to " do your job".
Well now they are "doing their job" and surprise, surprise yet more democrat bleating and claims of hypocrisy by the masters of hypocrisy themselves.
As for your rant about Trump voting by mail, I would expect he applies for an absentee ballot, thereby being registered and I'd, which is completely different from mass unsolicited ballots sent all round the state.
You probably know that, but as it doesn't fit the narrative you prefer to continue with the lies and hatred along with the rest of your kind.
- 1
- 2
- 1
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
36 minutes ago, placeholder said:Thanks for the fake news.
Biden-Harris Arizona event had no fanfare because the campaign didn’t invite the public
???????????? Oh fake news.
So Biden / Harris show up together on their Bus tour at an event in Phoenix, but they didn't want anyone to know because they're worried about the huge crowd that would have shown up contracting corona virus.
Okay got it.
The Democrats must be supremely confident they've got their mail in voting fraud dialled in, because this has to be the most ridiculous election campaign in the history of electioneering.
First they choose a candidate that doesn't even know what state he's in at any given time, what position he's campaigning for, or even occasionally who he is.
He can't read from a teleprompter. refuses to answer any questions on his position on important issues and hides in his basement for months.
For running mate they choose Harris, who for the 5 minutes she lasted in the primaries, labelled Biden among other things a racist, and when lamely asked about it by a fawning " journalist" was allowed to laugh it off in a wholly unconvincing manner.
Another one that can't answer a simple question and flip flops her position on various issues, according to how the wind blows.
If the American people elect these two phoneys to the white house they really do deserve everything they'll get.
- 1
- 3
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, J Town said:This election is dramatically different. Hillary was one of the most hated candidates in history. This time 45 has taken on that role.
If as you claim, " Hillary was one of the most hated candidates in history".
Why is it that days before the 2016 election Hillary was credited with a 92% chance of victory, all the "experts", the MSM, political pundits, talk show hosts anybody who was anybody, spouting their words of wisdom, " there is no possible way Donald Trump can win this election".
Do you remember that.?
I do, in fact sometimes when I get a bit low, I check out a compilation on you tube of all those " experts" espousing their opinions.
Always makes me chuckle. By the way, I've just seen a Biden / Harris rally ( if you can call it that) in Arizona, 8 people turned up, even the on board news anchor, couldn't talk that one up.
Yet again more Trump supporters turned up to a Biden " rally", than Biden supporters and heckled from distance.
In contrast VP Pence drew a crowd of 4000 in Florida.
Funnily enough I see that same confidence in a vast majority of the posters on here, it couldn't happen again could it.?
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:I wonder why Trump does these shows.
Does he really expect that he will convince anybody to vote for him when he shouts into a room with people who anyhow vote for him?
Or does he do that only for his own ego to see all the people who come and love him? I guess now is the time to do that. After the election he can stay home and cry.
Erm, I think they call it campaigning, apparently there's an election very soon.
Who knew a winning strategy would be to hide in a basement, not answer any questions by a fawning media and refuse to tell the American people what your policies are.
Apart from the orange man bad mantra, what else do the Dems have.?
- 3
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 3
-
1 hour ago, earlinclaifornia said:
Do you read your own posts? I think you are seriously deluded
1000USD I can have a third party hold both of bet and release to the winner.
Have you been at the sherry Earl .? Saying that you are seriously deluded is not calling you a name, it's a comment regarding your mental state.
So I can see the stake is 1000 usd
I also asked you what the terms were.
I ask that because with mail in voting I cannot see any way that the result is going to be known on Nov 3.
Add to that the fact that Hillary and the 600 or so lawyers will not allow Biden to concede under any circumstances.
The Democrats are also pushing the narrative that Trump will refuse to leave the White House.
There are many scenarios that could play out here.
The legitimacy of the declared winner could drag on for months.
Over to you.
-
9 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:
Name calling me will not get your point any more valid here. We will see, which of the two of us knows the American voter then real soon. Interested in putting money on a bet by chance?
Where in my post did I call you a name?.
What are your proposals for this bet.?
-
3 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:
66% Republicans in 2016 thought the SC was a most important reason voting. If he uses as a bargaining chip before his election instead of waiting he blows his wad.
So 66% of Republicans in 2016 thought that a republican president nomination for the vacant seat on the SC, was the most important reason voting republican in that election.
That certainly does Not mean that those 66% of republican voters are single issue voters and they are not going to bother voting in this election because Trump has already had 2 nominations.
If that's the extent of your conviction for a Biden victory, I think you are seriously deluded.
Look you are obviously an American citizen living in America, so I wouldn't presume to tell you what's going on in your own country, but I refuse to believe your contention that if Trump and the senate go ahead with filling this vacancy, then republican voters will not bother to turn out,
Sorry, but that to me is a ludicrous suggestion, particularly in this election, where there are many highly emotive and contentious issues at stake.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Sujo said:
A couple of points.
The grand jury only hears evidence from the prosecutor. No defence allowed. The prosecutor stated walker shot the officer but the defence after seeing the report questions the ballistic report as non conclusive, but cannot tell the grand jury.
Do you have a link for your post, the op clearly states Sargeant Manningly was shot in the thigh.
Something not right here.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Mama Noodle said:
Anywho, Louisville getting the full BLM treatment right now. Riots, fires, organized antifa presence...
Real awesome.
You have to feel for the Louisville residents.
Hopefully now that the facts of the case have been revealed, and yet again the MSM and the left are shown up for the race baiting, anarchy agitators they are, this converts into more votes for Trump.
- 2
-
1 hour ago, earlinclaifornia said:
Apparently this all is a bit over you head I think. Now that he will have the SC completed, he has accomplished the task. Are you believing that he will garner a "thank you" vote? Hardly, deal is done, bye-bye.
I think there are 3 possible scenarios here.
1) I am as you suggest thick as mince.
2) English is not your first language.
3) You are in fact Joe Biden commenting under a pseudonym.
The reason I say this is because your post is utter jibberish.
Are you inferring that Trumps sole purpose of running for president in 2016 was because he knew back then that he would get the opportunity to nominate 3 candidates for the SC.
That the reason why people voted for him was because they wanted 3 Conservative leaning justices on the SC, and if Trump completes that task before the election then they don't need to vote for him.
I look forward to your reply, if only to confirm its not scenario 1).
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
8 hours ago, polpott said:And I presume that its because "elections have consequences" that Trump is desperate to appoint his nominee before Biden takes the White House and the Dems take the senate in January despite the latest announcement from the FBI that Comrade Putin is going four square behind Trump and using any means at his disposal to rig the election in favour of Trump.
Oh gawd, you still banging that drum.?
It's been four years, and you still can't make anything stick, change the record you've long since past the boring threshold.
I'm looking forward to Pelosi carrying out her threat to impeach Trump every day if she has too.
Should convert into thousands of more votes for Trump from the undecideds.
- 2
- 1
-
6 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:
It is truly accurate elections have consequences and make me wonder why trump is to not playing this smarter. Once this is played he has no real leverage or reason to have any reelection support. He is spent and they are exhausted.
Please explain how he could play it smarter.
He is already taking the opportunity that has presented itself, by installing another Conservative on the SC.
The Dems made a mistake in 2016 by not pushing for RBG to retire in her early to mid eighties, they arrogantly believed Clinton was a shoe in. There is no way Trump will pass this opportunity up, and why should he.?
There is also the threat of the 600 or so lawyers the Dems have recruited to tie up this election in litigation, just in case they don't quite pull off their election fraud.
A 6-3 majority on the SC will be vital.
As for having no re election support, are you serious?
I suggest you take a look at the support he's getting at his rallies.
Do they look like they're not turning out to vote to you.?
I guess you're going to have to burn it all down.!
Good luck with that.
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, polpott said:Do you expect anyone to believe that nonsense? Really? The constitution says nothing about filling it with indecent haste, which it normally isn't. You've really got it bad.
If you really can't see the opportunity for the president and the republicans to stack the SC with another Conservative.
Then it's your own blind hatred of Trump, that stops you believing that the Dems would have done anything differently had the opportunity arisen.
The funny thing is, this situation arises because ginsberg refused or neglected to retire during the Obama administration. Thereby disallowing Obama the opportunity of placing a younger candidate on the SC.
I suspect the arrogance of the Dems came into play a little there, in that they couldn't see in any way that Trump would win in 2016.
Whats that saying, oh yeah,
"elections have consequences".
- 3
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
6 hours ago, polpott said:Yes in 2016 the senate vetoed Obama's choice for SCOTUS for exactly that reason even though it was much further from the election than at present. The senate then laid down a convention that it would not be allowed to happen again prior to future elections.
The irony is that it was Mitch McConnell who laid down the convention, the very person that is now pushing hardest for that convention to be broken.
I think you will find that in 2016 when judge scalia died and Obama wanted to place his pick on the SC,
Obviously the white House under Obama was held by Democrats.
The Senate was held by republicans, seems to me that the republicans blocked the appointment.
Ironically in 2016 both Obama and Biden contended and argued that constitutionally the president Should be allowed to fill the vacancy on the SC.
Trump is merely doing his job efficiently and filling a vacancy as he is constitutionally required to do.
Hope that helps.
- 3
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
33 minutes ago, Sujo said:Well you have over 20,000 of trumps lies to consider. Will take you a while, better get to it.
Aagh the old Trump has told 20000 lies, lie.
It doesn't matter how many times you post it. nobody believes it and nobody cares.
- 1
- 1
- 3
-
1 hour ago, RANGER55 said:
Well, one thing for sure. A whole lot of people have had their fill of California and NY. Read an article last week that said that one of the major problems was you can't find enough U-Haul trucks to move. They are all left in Texas and other states east. No ones stupid enough to rent one and come back to California. Except maybe illegals crossing form Mexico and your super rich geeks in Silicon Valley that live in those gated communities with private security.
Who can blame them, cheaper property, better standard of living with up to 60% lower cost of living.
The icing on the cake being escaping from lib policies that ruin life for many.
As I understand it though many texans are none too happy about it, particularly if they bring their Liberal views with them.
- 2
-
On 9/14/2020 at 1:18 PM, candide said:
Which is exactly what you are doing (repeating it over and over again to make it truth).
You will not find any quote from Pelosi or Biden mentioning the CHINA travel ban, nor saying that the WHO showed no evidence etc....
BTW are you aware that it's Trump who downplayed the epidemic, stating that Dems were creating panic?
I beg to differ, both Biden and Pelosi labelled Trumps ban on travel from China and slightly later the EU, xenophobic.
Pelosi openly encouraged travel to Chinatown, proclaiming it perfectly safe to do so.
Why are you openly lying.?
-
18 hours ago, Redline said:
Fortunately, Biden isn’t a pathological lier
Really,? try doing some research, there are plenty of examples.
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
On 9/14/2020 at 6:36 AM, Matzzon said:Sorry, but you know? This is historical. Never have so much money been spent to get rid of one man. Never have so many different enemies in an US election found such strong common ground. The need to get rid of one man. That should tell you something. Your idol is fading, and will soon be out of the picture.
Has it ever occurred to you why so many self interest groups are spending so much money to remove a non politician from the white House.
Please don't come back with because he's a waycist, xenophobic, misogynistic, lying, sexist, pussy grabbing, veteran hating incompetent.
Not only is it complete rubbish, it is also boring and unoriginal.
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
22 minutes ago, Jingthing said:Thats President Biden to you sooner than you think. You might be laughing but the majority of Americans will be very relieved to be rid of a toxic corrupt hate mongering anti science demagogue.
Getting a bit ahead of yourself there aren't you. President Biden.!!! The bumbling old fool can't even appear on a late night chat show without having a monitor script his answers, there's no enthusiasm for your moderate stooge in the US. He can only dream about attracting the crowds Trump gets at his rallies.
But you keep on fantasising about your Biden presidency, it'll make it all the sweeter when Trump wins again.
- 2
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Morch said:
Your opinion is not fact. You do not speak for any "we".
Unless by "we" you meant hardcore-Trump-supporters, then no, then "we" don't universally "know" what you claimed.
You should try taking a look on the Internet, there are lots of examples of creepy Joe, sticking his face and hands over young kids and refusing to let go. The sheer look of terror on some of the kids faces is unnerving to say the least.
Even the parents faces show a degree of concern, but are too scared to say anything.
- 1
- 2
- 1
Trump barnstorms Florida while Biden campaigns in Michigan, early vote surges
in World News
Posted
Cough cough, schh I thought that one had been put to bed.
Absolutely no truth in this scurrilous story whatsoever, Joe said so.
Look there's a squirrel.!