Jump to content

rcummings

Member
  • Posts

    312
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rcummings

  1. 49 minutes ago, cooked said:

    Keep minimalising the problem. For every case that is discovered, how many remain  hidden?  Postal voting opens up huge opportunities for fraud. You just aren't reading about what is happening across America. 

    You know what happens after the elections? There will be recounts, anulations, appeals, while the Dems scream "Trump is a dictator, he won't accept the results". For months. Riots will continue. 

     

    Thank you for sharing with us your wishful thinking.

  2. Speaking of broken promises. Trump just recently promised to issue at 12 o'clock on aug 24 an executive order which would stipulate that US pharmaceutical manufacturers offer drugs at a price that would match the lowest prices offered in Europe. To date, not only has he kept the text of said order secret, but so far he hasn't actually published it. Until that happens, it's null and void. Tick tock tick tock...

     

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Damual Travesty said:

    No one has any issues with the traditional form of mail in voting. One requests a ballot from the state, and the state sends the ballot to the requester who then returns his completed ballot.  

    Louisiana too.

    https://www.thenewsstar.com/story/news/2020/08/17/louisiana-elections-chief-rolls-back-covid-excuses-mail-ballots/5599084002/

  4. 57 minutes ago, Damual Travesty said:

    Even if I mail in my vote it does not end the fear I have of violence in my Country. A real fear. A real sadness. A real sense of despair over the continuing death and mayhem which you seem to think funny.

     

    No one has any issues with the traditional form of mail in voting. One requests a ballot from the state, and the state sends the ballot to the requester who then returns his completed ballot.  This is a far cry from a mass mail out of ballots to names and addresses which likely not current which opens the potential for massive voting fraud. Surely as an expert on all things Americana you would understand this.

    Actually, the State of Texas for one, does have issues with requests for mail-in balloting. You can't ask for a ballot because you fear being infected with covid19. A Texas court upheld the state government's position. There may be other states with similar provisions as well. Surely as an expert on all things Americana you would know this.

  5. 2 hours ago, RobFord said:

     

    The drop in acres burned since the 1920’s is due to fire suppression. They have gone from fire suppression to fire management with controlled burns. 


    “Firefighting efforts were highly successful, with the area burned by wildfires reduced from an annual average of 30,000,000 acres (120,000 km2) during the 1930s, to between 2,000,000 acres (8,100 km2) and 5,000,000 acres (20,000 km2) by the 1960s.”[4]

     

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_wildfire_suppression_in_the_United_States

     

    From what I’ve read you’re incapable of interpreting data. I’ll be listening to the scientists, not you. Thanks, but no thanks. 

    Most likely he just got his information from a denialist website and copied it to here without actually scrutinizing it. For example the temperature information he posted was taken from a reading made at the time. Lots of these temperatures need to be adjusted because the conditions under which they were taken need to be standardized. For instances some thermometers were in the sun, others in the shade.

  6. 10 hours ago, scammed said:

    nope, its not the hottest temperature ever, its not the hottest temperature in a century either,

    and its not even the hottest temperature in death valley california,

    that record was set in july 10 1922, yes, you read that right, 98 years ago

    when co2 was 1/3 less then today

    https://www.google.com/search?channel=crow2&client=firefox-b-d&q=monthly+weather+review+january%2C+1922

     

    furthermore wildfires has declined some 80% since the 1920's,

    and i will continue to combat disinformation wherever it rears its ugly head.

    https://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/docs/indicators/indicator-316.pdf

    tot-ac-bur.jpg

    So you're the one combating disinformation? If that's the case why didn't you include this text which explains that graph? Allow me to cast doubt your bona fides:

     

    " Between 1945 and 2000, fire suppression substantially reduced annual acreage burned. Since 2000, an increase in area burned has occurred, although it has not yet reached the levels recorded between 1925 and 1960... Estimates of total affected area indicate a significant increase in fire damage in recent years, with the cumulative area affected for the 2003-to-2007 (40 million acres) period representing an increase of 1.5 times the area affected in the 1998-to-2002 period (25 million acres)."

     

     

    • Like 1
  7. 10 hours ago, scammed said:

    nope, its not the hottest temperature ever, its not the hottest temperature in a century either,

    and its not even the hottest temperature in death valley california,

    that record was set in july 10 1922, yes, you read that right, 98 years ago

    when co2 was 1/3 less then today

    https://www.google.com/search?channel=crow2&client=firefox-b-d&q=monthly+weather+review+january%2C+1922

     

    furthermore wildfires has declined some 80% since the 1920's,

    and i will continue to combat disinformation wherever it rears its ugly head.

    https://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/docs/indicators/indicator-316.pdf

    tot-ac-bur.jpg

    And that decline was due to ramped up fire suppression by the Forest Service

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_wildfire_suppression_in_the_United_States

     

  8. 11 minutes ago, Donga said:


    Yes, I find some of the rationale on this thread bewildering. Trump didn't discover plasma but he has been championing it's effectiveness, including his support in July behind a CSL study in Australia. Red tape would seem to be an issue in the US and FDA has come around after Trump hassled them about delays. What's the problem guys?

    I'm no fan of Trump, but surely he's entitled to rattle the chain to move things along. Here's recent trial data... https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/the-wall-street-journal/convalescent-plasma-reduced-death-rate-among-covid19-patients-study-signals/news-story/8da3e70261a2eabd88cca042f49cce4b

    Because he understands the scientific issues surrounding questions of its efficacy?

    • Thanks 1
  9. 28 minutes ago, simple1 said:

    About 20 million Americans have gained health insurance coverage since the ACA was enacted. 

     

    https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/healthcare/news/2020/03/23/482012/10-ways-aca-improved-health-care-past-decade/

     

    27 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

     

    Thats not what dude said. 

    Yes it is what I said:

    '20 million people who previously had no health insurance got coverage thanks to Obamacare before the covid virus hit."

    What's the problem?

     

    • Like 1
  10. 3 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

     

    1 - You cant prove those are people who "had no health insurance" but "got coverage thanks to Obamacare" because there's millions that were bumped off their original coverage and forced onto obamacare exchanges. 

     

    2 - You frame it like it happened directly before covid, and that link is a culmination of years. 

    Source?

    And keep in mind that there is plenty of evidence that 20 million more Americans are now covered.

     

    I didn't frame it like it happened directly before covid. If anything that would make my case weaker as though  Obamacare had finally succeeded 9 years after being enacted.

    • Like 2
  11. 10 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

     
    And you’d think that because you have a toxic mind, but in reality both Kellyanne and her husband George (of project Lincoln fame) are both walking away from their posts due to what I can only assume are their daughters very public Twitter meltdowns. 

    For a moment I doubted your version of the situation but when you wrote "I can only assume..." that changed everything.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...