AndyFoxy

22 hours ago, sungod said:

But the article does say you are more likely to die or be hospitalized with repeat infection, that was my point.

 

The other article said symptoms generally decrease with repeated infection. It contradicts.

 

The wife started her 3rd infection 2 days ago. First one had the most symptoms. Second had no symptoms. Third had a mild sore throat/headache/stuffy nose for one day. Time between first and second was 5 months. Time between second and third was 9 months.

If money wasn't an issue, 3 months a year in New Zealand, 6 months a year in SE Asia, the other 3 months travelling to far away places.

In reality, a house in Laos, next to a river.

2 hours ago, voyagerUSA said:

Yes, I've used Gleneagles outpatient services before and is pretty good

I use Union Hospital in Tai Wai and the CUHK Medical Centre. Been impressed with both. 

I’m in Hong Kong. Don’t go public. Waiting times/lists are too long. I go private here and have been good. Not cheap but quality.

8 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Exactly. They believe yet have no evidence or facts to back up those beliefs. Back to my first post.

In the pandemic, there was evidence and facts to back up ideas from scientists, yet they were censored because they didn't fit the truth.

To me, men can't get pregnant is a fact. All the evidence points to that. Yet others believe the opposite.

48 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Evidence/facts does it for me.

And any evidence/facts you don’t like, you can just trot out the old conspiracy theory line. ????

What a way to go 

22 hours ago, koolkarl said:

Return of the Chinese tourists and the covid cases surge.

Living in fear

4 hours ago, bamnutsak said:

Maybe train first, then arm?

 

But yeah, this is an idea we've heard before.

 

Nobody will give the lunch lady any grief, cuz she's packin'

 

And maybe don't arm the janitor. He's a little bit loopy.

 

Why not just arm all the children?

 

I wouldn't arm the kids. 

Arm and train all school staff.

Some air hostesses earning 9K HKD a month and they act all high and mighty. Do your job sky waitresses.

1 hour ago, findlay13 said:

Red wings  has a different connotation in some circles 

I got mine at a party when I was 14

9 hours ago, 2009 said:

Well, imho, good for them seeing sense.

 

Maybe they realized not many boys wanted to get their 'tuck friendly' girls' bathing suit.

 

Nothing wrong with being gay, but why do you need to tuck your meat n potatoes between your legs?

 

And imagine marketing that to kids?

 

Hurl.

 

What ever happened to just being a child?

 

I can just hear the mothers, "Jessica, don't forget to tuck you cock n balls between your legs when you go out to play at the pool."

 

 

I'll ask my son tonight if he'd like a tuck friendly swimsuit with a satanic label on it. He'll be like "WTH are you talking about?'

23 minutes ago, h90 said:

OK for now on you must be carnivore, not allowed to eat plants. We search you on the street (don't shoot you) and put you in jail if we find a tomato on you.

Hilarious

11 minutes ago, PPMMUU said:

It's a major problem. People who have serious effects from using cannabis are going to hospitals and using up healthcare resources. Some may argue whether or not this puts a heavy burden on healthcare, but saying it's not a major problem is just not true.

 

Alcohol consumption is a very very big problem. Merely stating that something causes fewer issues than beer does not hold much weight.

Exactly. It is a dangerous drug

12 minutes ago, bamnutsak said:

 

This is the common response from those who make preposterous statements, and are then unable to handle any criticism. So they go on the offensive and claim others are aggressive. And then they throw in an all-encompassing insult (their drug habits.). I get it, we learn this sort of behavior in the school yard, and then many grow out of it.

 

We'll be sure to treat your subsequent posts with more gentleness so as to not come across as too aggressive.

 

 

 

 

Thanks for proving my point

22 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said:

What "good reasons"?

"AndyFox knows nothing about Cannabis but does not like it" is not a good reason, by the way.

SMH at the ......no....I'll leave it.

24 minutes ago, h90 said:

You would be also aggressive if someone bans something you like....you aren't allowed to have a beer anymore, or no more pork chops for you...they are illegal.

That is more than understandable...What I don't get is why some people think they are entitled to regulate someone else life.

I don't drink beer and pork chops.....meh.....I can go vegetarian if I want.

1 hour ago, 2baht said:

Careful Andy, there's a Red under your bed! 

A red what?

1 hour ago, bamnutsak said:

You mean kill all the drug users here? There's like 280,000 persons incarcerated here for drugs (mostly meth). All of the prisoners in for cannabis (~ 4,000) have already been released. Should they be rounded up as as well, and murdered? Just askin'.

 

 

Maybe workshop those ideas a bit before publishing them. ????

 

 

No, I wouldn't murder them. But at least put down......and if not put down.....then severely punished.