Chalky0w

I was in exactly your situation and wrote my own Director’s letter to UK embassy and was approved. Not sure everything I did was required but details: - Used company letter headed paper with logo - Stated I was an employee and owner - Stated company was private limited, registered in UK and gave company number and registered address - Provided nature of my business and that it could be performed remotely - Signed it myself as director - Included one appendix with link to and screen shot from companies house website showing I was sole director - Included second appendix with portfolio of clients (various across multiple countries). This didn’t show revenue for each client but did summarise gross profit from latest financial year. I had other evidence available if requested (e.g. personal self-assessment tax return, company accounts, etc.) but they weren’t requested. Hope useful and good luck

I knew “soft power” would mess up this visa. There is a difference between people attending “seminars” per this example, medical appointments, Muay Thai classes, etc. and people working remotely. Don’t deny that there are plenty of chancers that work remotely but at least in theory you’ve got an ongoing income. I said before, it should have been split into two visas: - Soft power for 1 year with renewable option IF reason ongoing and still have 500k available - Remote worker is fine for 5 years IF they have a minimum annual income I’ve been in, out and back in with no problems but reports of hostility are building.

Was this directed at me? I’m certainly not naive enough to believe immigration have much integrity and wouldn’t deny entry / wouldn’t falsify records for their own reasons. I’m also not naive enough to believe every negative story on the internet about immigration. Authors may make things up for giggles or for example they may be connected to the assisted entry / border bounce companies. I apologised in advance to Briggsy if I’d misunderstood the apparent contradictions between their posts and the apology still stands if their account is genuine.

Hmm, appreciate the reply but in the first entry you were denied and in second entry you say you were warned. If genuine then I apologise but something doesn’t add up! Are you telling a Christmas fairytale? 😉

This is concerning. I’ve had a few METVs and no problems but moved to DTV now. On the other thread there is a video that shows the MFA consider the visa as just “initial screening” and IO get the final say on entry or extension. Would you mind sharing your history? - Do you just bounce in/out or have holidays? - Do you only go to low-cost neighbouring countries or trips to Singapore, Japan, Korea? - Do you go to and stay in home country? Sorry for the questions but I’m interested in possible reasons why IO would reject if you had a visa.

I’ve been out and back-in. No comments or requests from immigration other than visa, passport and boarding card. Not sure if it makes a difference but hadn’t been in Thailand as long as you. Details: - originally arrived in October - went on a side trip for 2 weeks in November - flew back in to Chiang Mai Previous history: - had been in home country for about 4 months before coming to Thailand in October - had been using METVs for previous couple of years - side trips on METVs had mostly been genuine “holidays” for a week or two rather than just border bounces although had done a couple of border bounces - never previously been questioned / warned by immigration - no previous ED visas or volunteer visas or covid extensions that reports seem to indicate trigger problems No idea if any of that makes a difference!

No, I’m a “remote worker” but don’t want to get caught in a crack down on soft power. Shared my experience in previous thread but in brief: - Own a UK business - Applied in UK - Provided statement from UK cash savings account - Provided utility bill from my UK property - Provided letter that: - Showed companies house record demonstrating I’m sole director - Showed client list (UK, US, Chinese, Canadian, French… clients) - Showed profit / loss for last financial year Had additional evidence available if required but wasn’t. I don’t actually work much in Thailand except to answer a few emails but lucky enough that working for 3 months in UK can more than pay for a 9 month stay in Thailand plus side trips.

Agree. I’m on a DTV and it feels far too easy! I would expect 500k in bank and then either: - 5 year visa for remote working with proof of minimum income Or - 1 year visa for soft power with no proof of income I’ve said on a few threads that 500k wouldn’t last very long if you don’t have an income (e.g. gap year student, made redundant, etc.). If you come with no income and only 500k in bank but decide you want to stay longer than originally planned, this is where people will be tempted to try stealing, begging, selling drugs, scamming, working illegally, etc. End result will be to give everyone on a DTV a bad reputation.

Maybe phrased poorly but wasn’t talking about professional criminals, as you say they have other options. More likely is someone who has 500k but no income (e.g. gap year student, person made redundant in home country, etc.). They come with intention of staying 6 months but decide to try a “side hustle” to prolong their stay. Removing the soft power options, requirement to maintain a balance to re-enter and / or ability to demonstrate a minimum (legitimate) income would reduce chance of this type of abuse. Ordinarily I wouldn’t care what people do but any reports of abuse of DTVs will give IO an excuse to deny entry or demand bribes - something I don’t want!

This is the bit that seems strange to me and wondering if it could get tightened in the future - duration of visa shortened, amount increased, minimum income required or something? At the moment, there is no minimum income for remote working option and 5 years is a long time to survive on 500k so in theory you could book a cooking class and then try and “get-by” on the 500k with no other income for 5 years like the guy in the other forum trying to make 1 million baht last 14 years. Not exactly beneficial to Thailand if only living on 100k a year and almost green light for people who want to setup illegal businesses, work illegally, sell drugs, etc. Hope I’m wrong but like DrJack says it is a bit too easy at the moment!

Multiple Entry Tourist Visa (METV) is designed for this I think. Did hear a few reports of people being questioned even when using one of these but I had a few for consecutive years and never had any problems personally.

Sure. Utility bill was an example of item requested and what I supplied but nothing strenuous. Have you applied yet? I’m curious what the reaction was / will be when you say you have $1 per month income

Can’t help with cooking class questions but I applied online. For location: The electronic application form shows that it needs to be completed from country of residence. It asks for current location, date of travel, point of entry and flight number. You don’t have to upload evidence of these except a recent utility bill as proof of residence in current location. You could potentially complete the details fraudulently but there are reports of people being asked to supply additional documents - if caught you’d likely lose the application fee and could have problems with future visa applications. For bank account: You can show a bank account with AUD or other currency. It doesn’t have to be in a Thai bank. I don’t believe the money has to have been in the account for any set period of time.

I think your association with Patong (per username) is clouding your view. There are plenty of Thai female architects, scientists and accountants and although your comment wasn’t directed at me, I can assure you that some of them are in relationships with Westerners

Can’t fault the cooking school for being cautious! I’ve had my visa approved but not worried about serious criminals using it who are likely to be a tiny minority. I am more nervous it will be abused by lots of petty criminals or people doing things a little bit naughty so instead of young / middle aged professionals that do work remotely, it will attract people who work in illegal casinos, scam call centres, sell drugs, etc. or even work illegally in bars, restaurants, tour operators, etc. The entry criteria is quite low and sure it won’t be long before stories come out and all DTV holders will be looked at with suspicion.