Jump to content

stevenl

Advanced Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    36,929

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by stevenl

  1. stevenl
    I would say it's too early to drink, apparently you thought otherwise.
  2. stevenl
    " They dynamics are well known, and expected." You're like a windvane here. When I commented on this a few weeks ago you were denying, and now suddenly it was to be expected? Only a fool did not see this coming.
  3. stevenl
    That's a common but one of the better looking ones tourist fishing boat in the photo. They typically have besides the captain only 1 crew member.
  4. stevenl
    Yes, idiot in all those cases. There is however a 4th possibilty, the car he collided with came from a sideroad or soi without looking for overtaking traffic.
  5. stevenl
    That's why I said "Since the SC appears to be willing to hear the case".
  6. stevenl
    Go and have a look there. It's not a blind bend. FYI, I avoid that road but if somehow I end up there I don't overtake, a dangerous road IMO.
  7. stevenl
    Most likely, very most likely, the van driver was at fault. But no, that bend is not blind. And looking at the damage it was not a high speed collision. So either the drivers saw things coming and reduced speed or the vehicle coming from the opposite direction was not yet at speed.
  8. stevenl
    Since the SC appears to be willing to hear the case this argument has been tossed out "The Trump campaign earlier accused Mr Smith of trying "a Hail Mary by racing to the Supreme Court and attempting to bypass the appellate process"."
  9. stevenl
    You don't know, he could have just got onto the road. Your quote does not state at all how long he was on the road, could have been 5 seconds.
  10. stevenl
    You do realize it would be his own lawyers asking the questions, or doing the badgering as you call it?
  11. stevenl
    Could easily be the approaching vehicle just entered the road from a driveway or small soi.
  12. stevenl
    So since the guardian published I, the opinion of the quoted Tories is to be ignored.
  13. stevenl
    Amir Weitmann, the head of the libertarian caucus in Israel's ruling Likud Party, From https://www.kyivpost.com/videos/23228
  14. stevenl
    "It’s hard to imagine this was ever actually a priority,” I think that's the crux of the issue. This is theatre, it may look good and distracts from the real issues.
  15. stevenl
    'A Likud partymember' is not doing his position or influence justice.
  16. stevenl
    No, going downhill.
  17. stevenl
    Looking forward to a link of that peer review.
  18. stevenl
    His company has been found guilty already in this trial.
  19. stevenl
    Video shows it all, the pickup is the culprit.
  20. stevenl
    I don't know who you mean with 'we', but I appreciate science. Scientific opinions and articles I value on a topic like this, non scientific opinions not so much.
  21. stevenl
    So the answer is no, sarcasm is a foreign comment to you. If you want to ask Danderman a question, send him a PM. Questions on the open forum are for everyone to see and respond to.
  22. stevenl
    Ever heard of sarcasm?
  23. stevenl
    The royal family is around.
  24. stevenl
    I don't see why it would. People will simply change their hours but not increase
  25. stevenl
    Thanks for a post without personal attacks on other forum members or taking swipes at other people.

ASEANNOW

ASEANNOW (formerly Thai Visa) Thailand's oldest and most popular forum for expats and foreigners.

Sign up today and have your say

MORE INFO

POPULAR AREAS

CONTACT US

219/59 Asoke Towers, 15th Floor, Soi Sukhumvit 21, Watthana, Bangkok 10110
(+66) 99 196 1100
[email protected]

×
×
  • Create New...