gafdtomaka366

Stop discussing everything but anything related to my question.  ????????????

New cases - it's people who are to blame because they won't do what they're told by the government!

A low number of new cases - it's the government and its super rapid preventive measures; or a low number of tests; or the angle of how they report about the situation

"Thailand has seen 0 new cases for the 6th consequative minute"

17 hours ago, fdsa said:

I don't know about crypto exchanges as I was trading cryptos with private persons only and received money from the private person bank accounts to my personal bank account.

Man, why do you give advice without knowing a dime about the subject?

I don't need theory. And I asked about crypto exchanges and not private persons who trade crypto and fiat between themselves.

The question isn't about how fast the transactions have landed but WHAT is it that TW reffers to by warning "recent regulatory changes in Thai bank system"

Does anybody know?

31 minutes ago, fdsa said:

Sending to Thai banks - no problems at all with <10k, sending abroad from Thailand - may be questions from the bank staff.

yes, less than than 10k usd in sum and per month;

let's say,  when sending from an exchange,  "binance inc" or whatever it'll be, will appear as the sender - no problem?  And nothing that'll oblige me to anything such as taxes or any sort of extra documentation?

And, is the threshold < $10k/month?

In the beginning of Jan 2021 Transferwise, when sending money to a thai bank, Transferwise warned me, something similar to this: "because of the recent changes or regulations in Thai finance system, your transfer may take longer than usual".

A crackdown? Where is a news, does anyone know what it reffers to?

1 hour ago, PatOngo said:

So you WANT to stay there locked up for 2 weeks, do you??

In an ASQ-paradise, which itself is located in yet another country-paradise. Oh, yeah

**Sending from an exchange to a thai bank accout, and vise versa.

Sending from and receiving to my bank account in Thailand, from and to, basically, any crypto-exchange, and non-Thailand based especially. Is this allowed? At least, is it not prohibited? Let's say, the amount would be under $10k per month in sum.

I need a precise information, because I don't want to get my account frozen.

Staff of a bank might not know about that, therefore I need to hear about the experience of those who have had it.

On 1/16/2021 at 2:19 AM, PatOngo said:

Get it through your heads, NOBODY wants to sit in a quarantine hotel for two weeks!

In ASQ-paradises? Nobody?? Are you certain??

While abroad, I entered pincode incorrectly. I think I did it only once - 1 attemp. Maaaaaybe I made 2 attempts - I don't remember. My card got blocked for withdrawals, but continued to work for payments in general.

So, only 1 attemp? If there're 3 attempts allowed though, what's a time frame between 2nd and 3rd ones so that incorrect attempts will get reseted to 0 and a card won't get blocked?

The thing also is, one can unblock a card by phone only once. A second time one will have to ask for re-issuing a new one and pick it up in Thailand.

Let's take UAE.

99.9% of people in UAE wear masks. A fine for not wearing one is somewhat 1000 usd. 

Facts? Yes.

Despite that everyone wears a masks there have been around 1000+ new infections found daily and for over half a year.

This is also a fact.

Question: do masks work?

P.S.

"But if not masks, they'd be millions of trillions of quadrillions cases instead of just 1000+ ones" - no.

On 1/12/2021 at 4:30 PM, impulse said:

I've been to the gyms.  I've seen the guys get off a piece of equipment leaving a pool of sweat behind for the next person to sit in. 

 

Closing them isn't a bad idea in a time when that sweat may be contagious.

And so can be 1000 other things as well: buses, air in a closed room, food, any surface. Should we shut down everything in the whole world?

"So dangerous" would say people who stay home, wear a maks everywhere and still have  or will get infected despite that.

4 hours ago, shdmn said:

Yes, you can spend time and money trying to do all that and put your own health at risk or you can just, you know, get vaccinated.  Tough choice. 

* For around 95% of people there's no risk in the virus, not even an issue post recovery. Some, a half maybe or so", even aren't aware that they were sick and have already recovered, with no symptoms that is, let alone a "risk".

* Also, will you give everyone a 100% guarantee that there'll be no bad side effects whatsoever, 5-10 years down the road, if everyone gets a shot of a vaccine? Touch choice to guarantee that.

16 hours ago, shdmn said:

You are not as efficient a spreader though, because you are not sick and therefore you are not coughing and sneezing.   

Sick, but asymptomatic person isn't an efficient spreader either then - he's nor coughing, nor sneezzing.