SunnyinBangrak

Could the bill also apply to 2 white cisgender heterosexual people? Yes of course it could. But would I call this bill an onslaught against white cisgender heterosexuals? No, because that would be a lie or a gross misrepresentation of the bills content, which does not mention anything whatsoever about race, color, LGBT preferences or any of that. So why phrase this as an attack on minorities? I suppose for the same reason that the same people falsely called the bill protecting vulnerable children from predators as the "don't say gay bill" when it never mentioned anything about gay. "According to the bill, which passed Monday night, “a person shall not be required to solemnize a marriage if the person has an objection to solemnizing the marriage based on the person’s conscience or religious beliefs.” anyone willing to show me the anti LGBT, mixed race couples or transgender content specified in the bill?

seriously, I'm shocked reading what you wrote. I have been learning for the last 2 years + that the concept of "teachers" teaching young kids about the likes of anal sex, whacking off and butt plugs was a conspiracy theory. A product of the far right. Yet, now we see it is all too real. I would suggest any "teacher" telling young children about the delights of (insert adult appropriate material) needs to be put on the child sex register and never allowed within a mile of any school. Another conspiracy theory gone!! Thank you Mr DeSantis, you are vindicated completely. Bad day for Disney I suppose.

Do you approve of accused people not being allowed a defense? Is it fair to force an accused person to have people that harbor irrational hatred(Liz and Adam) for the accused to pretend to act as their defense? Would you like it if you were accused of a crime and only your worst enemy could defend you? This is the Jan6th achilles heel. By not allowing Trump a defense - who would have showed the clips TC showed to give proper perspective - they are a sham, something you would find in a fascist country. Think of it like this. If Nancy P was accused of some ridiculous nonsense, and only David DePape and Donald Trump could defend her in a trial. Would you consider such a crazy court to be "biased"?

Absolutely incredible to hear that. Isn't there a law against withholding exculpatory evidence? Rhetorical question, yes there is. The Brady rule.

Again. Tucker has his own opinions. Who cares? I would argue that defeating ISIS and nominating 3 supreme court judges was an achievement. Due to that and other achievements I think Tucker is wrong but can respect his stance and move on with life without issue.

My understanding of the NS2 was that it was a new pipeline ready to come online having undergone testing and filling with gas(major release of greenhouse gasses which escaped and nary a peep was heard from the climate crowd), and my point stands. Why destroy your own valuable asset that increases your power internationally and particularly with energy hungry Europe when you can simply turn it on/off

? They released a tiny selection of footage that portrayed Chansley as a wild and out of control MAGA insurrectionist. Footage Carlson released shows definitively he was at one stage behaving politely and peacefully while he was assisted in entering the senate by numerous armed police. That is proof that the Jan6th sham only showed footage that fit the narrative they wanted. How this is not a criminal act I do not understand. I expect Chansley will sue and win.

It means 1)who had the means to do it, 2)who had the biggest motive to do it, 3)who recently threatened to end the pipeline if a Ukraine invasion occurred - which it did, is probably the one that dunnit. Still no representative of the left has adequately explained why Putin would destroy his lucrative pipeline when he could have simply turned it off.

Did this also apply when the partisan comittee released cherry picked footage? Did you point this unfairness out at the time?

False. RT made multiple references to Hersh in the last 24 hours. Occam's Razor would suggest that what Hersh says has merit.

Here we go again with the conspiracy theories. Please state the evidence of Trump's being the "most corrupt president in American history", and for persepective how does he compare with biden(in the post laptop verified world) ? Good luck to Mike Flynn, hope to see much more of him.

We didn't expect to see the violent insurrectionist ringleader being helped by the cops, that's for sure! Well it seems obvious now why Trump was not allowed a defense in the comittee hearings. "In one of the clips, Capitol Police officers can be seen walking Chansley past seven armed colleagues standing just outside the Senate chamber. The QAnon Shaman is walked around several locked entrances to the chamber before officers seemingly help him open one to enter the Senate." https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1743217/QAnon-Shaman-Tucker-Carlson-January-6-riot-video-Capitol-Police-dxus

Not sure why the left are so astounded hearing that Tucker does not like Trump on a personal level that it is major headline news? All conservatives have their own ideas and tastes, they are not a homogenous hivemind leaping from one manufactured outrage to the next(eg Russia collusion/Musk/outrage over protecting kids from predators in schools/Kavanaugh/Carlson). Tucker is to be commended for keeping his personal feelings under control to as fairly as possible do his job. And let's remember what a huge week this has been for both Tucker and Trump - what with the whole Jan 6th narrative collapsing and much anger over the footage released that shows the lies and selected footage to misinform the public. Good to see both men concentrating on the important issue not on the distraction and irrelevance of personal feelings and gossip. "“GREAT JOB BY TUCKER CARLSON TONIGHT,” Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday night. “The Unselect Committee of political Hacks & Thugs has been totally discredited. They knowingly refused to show the Videos that mattered. They should be tried for Fraud and Treason, and those imprisoned and being persecuted should be exonerated and released, NOW!” https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-tucker-carlson-jan-6-videos-b2296627.html

Quote "Police Chief Thomas Manger, who denounced Carlson for spreading “offensive and misleading conclusions” about the insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021, including a “disturbing accusation” that Officer Brian Sicknick’s death had nothing to do with the riot." Did this police chief find the false narrative that MAGA rioters bashed him over the head with a fire extinguisher offensive and misleading one wonders? A version of events that proved most fortuitous and that some find hard to let go of. "While chief medical examiner Francisco Diaz said that the events of Jan. 6 "played a role in his condition" that resulted in Sicknick's death, the findings are still a bold departure from claims reported by The New York Times back in January that the officer had been "struck with a fire extinguisher" by the pro-Trump rioters. " https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-brian-sicknick-stroke

Democrats speaking in opposites again. The whole footage shows the Q Shaman was politely escorted and guided through the capitol by police. Another false narrative about Q Anon shamen storming the capitol and leading an insurrection bites the dust. Time to arrest the Jan 6th committee and charge them with deliberately withholding evidence that proves the accused to be innocent. Lying is bad. Lying for 2 years and holding farcical show trials they knew were nonsense is a new low in the left's dishonesty - although totally unsurprising after they refused to release footage(nothing to hide, nothing to fear?) Sad so many were taken in by the insurrection narrative. "Virtually every moment of his time inside the Capitol was caught on tape,” says Carlson, who was granted exclusive access by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to 40,000 hours of surveillance footage from that day inside and around the Capitol, which has never been seen before by the public. “The tapes show the Capitol police never stopped Jacob Chansley. They helped him. They acted as his tour guides.” https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/jan-6-footage-shows-capitol-cops-escorting-qanon-shaman-to-senate-floor/ar-AA18iDE3

The general public and voters are not so naive. The trust is gone, say the majority of republicans AND democrats "61% Believe Feds Helped Incite Capitol Riot. Seventy percent (70%) of Republicans, as well as 57% of both Democrats and unaffiliated voters believe it is at least somewhat likely that undercover government agents helped provoke the Capitol riot." https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/61_believe_feds_helped_incite_capitol_riot As for attacking the whistleblowers, I remember when even mentioning Adam Schiff's whistleblower pal Eric Ciaramella was enough to get you dinged from the internet(because all whistleblowers must be protected was the narrative). Now the democrats are freely doing exactly what they banned us from doing? Nice.

quote "His search for evidence to support that conspiracy theory ended in utter failure." To remind ourselves, the "conspiracy theory" you refer to was the claim by Trump that the Russia Collusion investigation was a hoax concocted by Hillary Clinton to distract from her email server nightmares. The conspiracy theory was proven true in the Robbie Mook court case when he confirmed it DID come from Hillary after all. So your claim that the Durham investigation ended in utter failure is totally false, it ended up with another democrat conspiracy theory being debunked. "The Russia-Trump collusion narrative of 2016 and beyond was a dirty trick for the ages, and now we know it came from the top—candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. That was the testimony Friday by 2016 Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook in federal court, and while this news is hardly a surprise, it’s still bracing to find her fingerprints on the political weapon. Mr. Mook testified as a witness in special counsel John Durham’s trial of Michael Sussmann, the lawyer accused of lying to the FBI" https://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-did-it-robby-mook-michael-sussmann-donald-trump-russia-collusion-alfa-bank-11653084709

Which specific "ad" is this referring to? Why would Murdoch have confidential material from the biden team? The only ad that I remember was the one when biden mocked Trump for walking carefully down a slippery ramp. Of course, that did not age well in light of biden's catastrophic fall from his stationary bicycle, and repeated wipe-outs on the same plane steps that biden mocked trump for being careful on. An absolute farce. "“Some people are always in a hurry,” a narrator says in the opening scene, over a montage of Biden riding a bike, walking away from an Air Force plane, preparing to go onstage and jogging up a ramp. At one point, as the narrator says that some people “race up steps when others take it slow” as a video shows Trump making an unsteady descent on a ramp after giving an address at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in June. That’s juxtaposed with video of Biden jogging up a similar ramp, from an address he gave at the academy." https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-to-troll-trump-with-2-minute-ad-set-to-run-during-renomination-speech/2020/08/26/47ad50c4-e7ef-11ea-97e0-94d2e46e759b_story.html

Fact check. 5 pinnochios. Trump never sent a "lynch mob" to do anything, let alone attack Mike Pence.

If there was no note left, and the girlfriend stood to benefit from his passing I would be very suspicious. But just because a suicide seems odd does not automatically mean foul play. I remember a depressed guy living near me hung himself with his hands tied behind his back(presumably to stop him changing his mind) which caused outrage online but it was just suicide.

I can see why his visit to the environmental catastrophe area and of course the lableak now being reluctantly admitted as most likely is benefitting Trump. It seems like he is being proved correct about contentious issues all the time these days. Funny that. I hate to say this, but trump's time has passed. It was incredibly damaging to democracy all the hoaxes against the guy even 2 silly impeachments but alas what's done is done. Most people can't take 4 more years of unbridled hatred and hoaxes from the media. So better let DeSantis have a go, and if he wins, just pray they will let him serve his term without all the dishonest attacks Trump faced.

Prices are coming down in Samui. Immediately after the law change most weed was 500B+ and hash 1,000B+. Nowadays there are loads of small general stores selling everything that also have some decent weed selections. One nearby tiny shop has about 30 strains and prices are 200-300B, cheaper if buying bulk. This is very reasonable, quality is very good. Proper dense buds nicely dried and cured. I'd advise to avoid any cannabis dispensary in tourist areas and maybe look for reggae flags or weed signs on small mom and pop stores.

Why would there be many many Ph.D. students looking into the origins, when it has been settled science for years? The virus came from a wet market. Anyone questioning the incredible coincidence of a bat virus research facility near the wet market were dubbed "racists"(1), and "conspiracy theorists" and censored and banned from the internet for spreading "disinformation". Can you agree the false smearing and censoring of those using logic and common sense to probe the unlikely coincidence was a mistake? So settled was the science that advertisers were punished for advertising (2)on channels that tried to be honest and discus the possibilities/probabilities of the lab leak. (1)"“Apoorva Mandavilli, a reporter “mainly” covering COVID-19 for the New York Times, believes the lab-leak origin theory for the virus to be by its very nature bigoted. Someday we will stop talking about the lab leak theory and maybe even admit its racist roots. But alas, that day is not today,” she wrote." https://www.nationalreview.com/news/new-york-times-covid-reporter-calls-discussion-of-lab-leak-theory-racist/ (2)"A government-affiliated group that attempted to blacklist conservative networks over "coronavirus conspiracies" is now coming under fire after a federal agency announced its analysis that the lab-leak theory could be true. The Global Disinformation Index reportedly sought to convince advertising companies to distance themselves from and punish conservative websites that suggested the coronavirus may have initially spread because it was leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/government-disinformation-group-fire-punishing-outlets-reported-lab-leak-theory I hope the free thinkers that spoke out loud about the Wuhan institute likely having had a lab leak or accidental release will be uncensored and allowed back online again. Just allowing one side of every debate online has not worked well, particularly in light of the mainstream being flat out wrong about the biggest issues and repeatedly censoring truth to allow democrat party benefitting lies and false narratives to flourish - such as the laptop and the lableak.

Apart from your use of profanity, your rant is completely false, off topic and offensive. I wonder what Kyle would make of this thread, seeing liberals defaming and smearing him and gleefully wishing bad stuff to happen to him? I suppose the blame for this disinformation and hysteria would be the likes of biden(1) falsely accusing him of stuff, and the msm running a false narrative(2) which caused the audible shock in court when it turned out Grosskreutz was pointing a gun at Kyle when he got shot, and as the censored conservatives tried to point out he was acting in SELF DEFENCE. (1)https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kyle-rittenhouses-mother-says-biden-defamed-son-suggesting-white-supre-rcna5453 (2)https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/26/jerrold-nadler/nadler-wrong-claim-rittenhouse-crossed-state-line-/

You call for violence against this poor persecuted kid. So appalling. He acted in self defence to stop the rioter shooting him. I suspect you are a victim of the fake news narratives surrounding this case that prohibited the facts being discussed. Facts that proved the act was self defence not some young MAGA racist that wanted to shoot minorities. "Prosecutor Thomas Binger asked Grosskreutz why he didn’t shoot first. “That’s not the kind of person that I am. That’s not why I was out there,” he said. “It’s not who I am. And definitely not somebody I would want to become.” But during cross-examination, Rittenhouse defense attorney Corey Chirafisi asked: “It wasn’t until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him … that he fired, right?” “Correct,” Grosskreutz replied." https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/08/shooting-victim-kyle-rittenhouse-520336 remember that? the moment the whole narrative collapsed.