SunnyinBangrak

Yes you missed the actual bank records that prove 100% the payments (which for many years the left claimed falsely never occurred at all) were made from CCP linked Chinese citizens exist as claimed by the GOP and people interested in facts since 2016 - rather than the payments being a conspiracy theory, a "manufactured crisis"(1) and "“classic example of the right-wing media machine” "The Biden Family Received Millions of Dollars from Foreign Sources: Bank records show the Biden family, their business associates, and their companies received over $10 million from foreign nationals’ and their related companies. The Committee has identified payments to Biden family members from foreign companies while he served as Vice President and after he left public office." https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-reveals-new-evidence-in-biden-familys-influence-peddling-schemes/ What is clear is that it was a far better situation for biden when the mainstream narrative was that the laptop containing all the evidence was "Russian disinformation" and the payments - well they never happened at all. (1)https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/cnns-brian-stelter-admits-hunter-biden-laptop-not-just-a-right-wing-media-story Finally, as someone that has been on the right side of this story since it initially broke, it is hard to see why you would be calling me "ridiculous". Is being factually correct on an issue ridiculous? Had the business between the bidens and these adversarial countries been legitimate there would have been no need for 7 years of disinformation, censorship and lies to protect the bidens.

If I understand this correctly, you are condoning a violent response to stoners doing their thing? While it may solve the immediate problem the legal repercussions for the assaulter could far outweigh the inconvenience of smelling weed on occasion. We live in a condo and smell weed all through the day, nothing that can be done, although yes some neighbors complain about it like it's the biggest issue ever.

That is not how I remember it. Isn't it factually correct to state that the official narrative was that a possible lab leak was a "conspiracy theory" so certainly not one side of a "bitter debate" as claimed in the OP?

Did I miss what Hunter and "his father sitting next to him" did to earn this $5 or $10 million? We are not talking small change here clearly the bidens provided a service of some sort, any idea from the biden fans what it could have been? Can we finally all now agree, that Joe Biden IS implicated in his sons business deals with foreign citizens in adversarial countries? How long did this take for the left to state what was blindingly obvious since before that election? 7 years of lies and dishonesty falsely claiming the payments a)did not exist at all and b) joe biden had never discussed foreign business deals with his son. 2 big lies.

Nobody can honestly argue there is one tier of justice applicable to all fairly and without favor. This is a tragic situation.

Not sure if that would work at depth?

"bleating"?? As someone that has been on the right side of this affair since day 1 (i never caved in to the russian disinfo misinformation campaign, it was clearly legit thanks to no denials from the family and credible witness testimony TB with receipts who was cc'd and involved with the schemes) calling my words "bleating" seems a tad inflammatory.

sent PM

Using "facts" from 2020 while discussing the bidens is clearly problematic. Many "facts" have changed. The laptop being verified as authentic not "russian disinformation" and that payments from dodgy foreigners to a web of shell companies associated with the bidens exist at all for starters.

You can't just jail a President on any old scuttlebut or hoax(of which we have seen so many). There needs to be a proper TRIAL using actual EVIDENCE under law which is supposed to be applied EQUALLY to all. Again we see the false and misleading phrase "stealing"!!?

Funny, you would think they would concentrate on the major story involving a sitting President allegedly and with strong evidence having a corruption problem with some VERY topical countries. They need to cover the important issues if they want to be thought of as credible.

He was not a career politician, so your phrasing is flat wrong. He would have taken(or received from others that did the physical removal) documents while a sitting President, not "steal documents" as a "former President". A difference of seismic proportions.

Keith will be furious at the Twitter management for allowing him to be publicly fact checked. I want to know if he and his ilk are totally uninformed or are they knowingly gaslighting because they have gotten away with that for so many years? There is no other option, they are either uninformed or very very dishonest. Fair to say that people that do not know the hammers story - and all other mistreatments of classified material by others that give crucial and necessary context to the latest Trump witch hunt - need better sources for their news. CNN anchor also tried claiming the hammer story was false and called for a real time fact check only to be brutally humiliated. https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/09/05/hillary-clinton-email-device-destuction-nr-sot.cnn

I agree. It is just too hard a sale for conservatives to accept a non-President can smash classified records on a hard drive with a HAMMER to destroy and it's totally fine, a non-President can store classified docs in what is essentially a crackhouse rented by national security nightmare Hunter Biden and again, it's fine. But don't let them catch a real President having some in a heavily guarded estate. Sorry, not buying it. Looks like a 2 tier justice system.

So why did John Brennan admit that it WAS political? This will have been very hard for him to admit to. "Ex-CIA chief admitted that the 'Dirty 51' letter 'WAS political' as agency conspired with Biden campaign to produce it and falsely claim emails on Hunter Biden's laptop were Russian disinformation" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12085077/Ex-CIA-chief-admitted-Dirty-51-letter-political.html

Totally false. The letter you refer to was not an authentic document, it was cooked up by the biden team. Please stop inferring that this was legitimate. All 51 totally and forever trashed their reputations with this hoax they knew had no basis in fact o dismiss evidence of bidens corruption as being "russian disinformation". "Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell testified before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, and revealed that Blinken was "the impetus" of the public statement signed in October 2020 that implied the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was disinformation." http://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/biden-campaign-blinken-orchestrated-intel-letter-discredit-hunter-biden-laptop Just so dishonest, and look at the mess it's causing.

Are you saying these audio recordings, plus all the bank records we recently saw, plus the collosal web of LLC's and shell companies recieving inexplicably earned money from overseas, plus the whistleblowers and people involved such as Bobulinski, plus all the emails and messages on the laptop are either all showing perfectly legitimate business for a career politician which are all legal, or all fakes? Nothing to them? Is it not more likely based on ALL the evidence combined that the GOP had this right from the get go, and that Joe Biden is indeed corrupt?

So, there IS very strong and credible evidence that joe biden was taking money from the Ukraine that we were promised never happened. What will happen to the people that actually IMPEACHED a President for wanting an investigation of the biden's corruption in Ukraine now that we know there is much evidence(that was covered up by the DOJ and would have immediately ended the impeachment farce) that corruption WAS taking place. If we remember he was impeached for falsely insinuating that biden was taking corrupt payments from the Ukraine that he actually WAS taking. No wonder conservatives do not trust the DOJ or democrat media one iota. Isn't it great for joe that the media is fixating on the illogical charges against his political opponent at such a crucial time which has somehow buried reports on the corruption we were told in no uncertain terms never happened. What a mess.

The corrupt and immoral "crossfire hurricane" investigation that started this whole weaponized DOJ against Trump leading us to today is hardly Trump's own fault surely? https://www.nationalreview.com/news/fbi-lacked-any-actual-evidence-of-collusion-between-trump-campaign-russia-when-crossfire-hurricane-launched-durham-finds/

The civil war is because the justice system is irredeemably destroyed by the double standards necessary to persecute Trump while sheilding his rivals.

Comparitively yes of course. MAL is heavily guarded you cant just walk in there. Key word is comparitively

Considering he went out for a leisurely game of golf after being indicted shows he doesn't gave a hoot about these political charges.

"Trump said that 'the ridiculous and baseless indictment… will go down as one the worst abuses of power on record.' 'This vicious persecution is a travesty of justice,' Trump insisted. 'You're watching Joe Biden [try] to jail his leading political opponent – an opponent that is beating him by a lot in the polls – just like they do in Stalin-ist Russia, or communist China. No different.' 'Our country has gone very bad. Just think of it – in three years.' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12181341/Trump-attends-rally-Georgia-indicted.html Seems I am an odd one out. I am about the only forum user here that just cannot comprehend how an ex President having some classified documents in safe storage while negotiating their return is the worst crime ever, while the senator and career politician that is persecuting his political opponent with a weaponized DOJ can have classified docs strewn around several unsecure locations including a house rented by his chummy with multiple foreign adversaries drug addict son and it is the GOLD STANDARD of good storage and certainly not a crime. I just don't buy it, sorry. How can a President not have the power to see classified docs? How can a senator have more legal ability than a President to have classified documents at home? Why was Trump's classified document scandal dealt with by dozens of hysterical threads yet when it was known biden did the same an urgent message appeared stating it's absolutely normal for govt people to have classified docs at home no big deal? Is a vindictive 3rd world justice system used to attack political opponents really in the left's best interest after the euphoria wears off? Seeing America hurtle toward civil war thanks to a broken justice system is heartbreaking but not in the least surprising.

Companies and govt agencies going all-in with this Pride trend seems to generally be very divisive. I think everybody should be left alone to QUIETLY go about their lives without forcing others to watch and approve.