jerrymahoney

Evidence is not Evidence until it is admitted in Court. One only has to look at the Georgia case where the Raffensperger 'find me 11K votes' phone call was the impetus for the whole investigation and indictment. Recording and transcript readily available. Tossed by Judge McAfee on an indictment wording technicality.

Not same same. The Judge has stipulated that Knight/Trump has sufficiently proved that the bond is authorized and acceptable in NY State and is sufficiently capitalized. It is up to the AG to prove otherwise.

Again, the 22 April hearing before Judge Engoron is for the AG to show cause why the bond should not be accepted, not for Knight /Trump to have to show why it should.

Again that Reuters report dated 4 April.

That Reuters report dated April 4 -- the Judge has a 'show cause' to AG James order on that 22 April hearing as of 16 April.

AS noted in the Salon article: “The DJT Trust granted KSIC a security interest in a Schwab brokerage account, in which the DJT Trust is obligated to maintain no less than $175 million in cash or cash equivalents at all times,” read an affirmation filed in support of the bond by Gregory Serio, a former superintendent of insurance for New York state. “KSIC also has a standing agreement with its parent company, Knight Insurance Company, Ltd. (‘KIC’), by which KIC reinsures 100% of KSIC’s risk,” added Serio, who is a partner of government consulting firm Park Strategies. “The $175 million bond at issue is adequately secured.” And from that affirmation by the former NY State Superintendent of Insurance: 38. Based upon the foregoing, it is my professional opinion that the surety on the undertaking filed by KSIC on April 1,2024, as amended on April 4, 2024, is sufficient and that there is no basis for the exception filed on April 4, 2024. -- But it seems AG James will have to object today EDT to respond to Judge Engoron's request for the 22 April ruling to show cause why the bond should not be accepted.

OK.

My take is that the Judge has basically approved the 16 April (lengthy) submission from Knight/Trump and will sign off officially unless AJ still objects. Any official objection from AG James et al must be in writing as 19 April (EDT) as best I recall.

As per the Judge's order above, the 22 April hearing has gone from whether the Knight/Trump bond can justify its dodgy existence to the AG James et al having to prove why their objection to the bond was not taken "unnecessarily and for vexation" as per the wording of the objection 2506 statute

You asked for a link I like to this topic. The topic is: Trump pays $175 million bond

OK https://twitter.com/eelarson/status/1780617494304309714

Letitia James Under Pressure to Show Why She Rejected Trump Bond Published Apr 17, 2024 at 12:07 PM EDT New York Attorney General Letitia James will have to explain why her challenge to Donald Trump's $175 million bond was not taken "unnecessarily and for vexation," a judge has ruled. Judge Arthur Engoron set an April 22 hearing after Trump's legal team filed a large amount of paperwork on Monday to prove that Knight Specialty Insurance Company (KSIC) was legally permitted to post the bond for Trump. If Trump wins the case on April 22, James will have to pay the costs of the former president reapplying to the court with new bond paperwork. https://www.newsweek.com/letitia-james-under-pressure-rejected-donald-trump-bond-1891350

Company defends Trump’s $175 million bond in new filing After the New York attorney general raised concerns, the bond company said cash from the former president backed the deal April 16, 2024 at 4:35 p.m. EDT via Washington Post Representatives for the firm that posted a $175 million bond for Donald Trump pushed back against objections raised by New York’s attorney general, saying in a court filing late Monday that the deal is “adequately secured” by the former president’s cash. The filing sets the stage for a court hearing next week in Trump’s New York civil fraud case, where Justice Arthur Engoron will decide whether the bond has met state requirements — allowing Trump to appeal a massive civil judgment and preventing state authorities from seizing his properties in the meantime. The filing also argues that Knight is properly licensed, including a statement from New York’s former superintendent of insurance, Gregory V. Serio, that Knight is qualified to do business in the state. https://archive.is/wQoSh#selection-685.0-735.371

I just looked at the interplay between myself and Danderman on the Florida poll and I woulddn't change a thing.

No -- I've got the WHOLE quote: You got nothing in court, you don't got the bookkeeper, you got NOTHING! NOTHING! And if you were a man, you would've done it now! You don't got a thing, you punk! https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/The_Untouchables