ebice

“The rate of a positive COVID-19 test is substantially lower in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals up to the age of 29,” Public Health England’s latest report notes. “In individuals aged greater than 30, the rate of a positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated.” https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1023849/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_40.pdf

Time to find more effective barriers against covid transmission especially among the vaccinated. Seems delta variant is infecting & spreading despite vaccination status. Time will tell how, when natural immunity and new, better performing vaccines find a path in herd immunity. “fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated contacts.” https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00648-4/fulltext

Cause of death classification explained. This should not be the case. https://week.com/2020/04/20/idph-director-explains-how-covid-deaths-are-classified/

They should do a study on the comparative early death rates between people who can understand the CNN headline and people laughing at it, because the results are likely to be similar. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/22/health/covid-vaccines-death-rates/index.html

Because its misleading, intellectually obtuse rubbish. "...this study found that COVID-19 vaccine recipients had lower non-COVID-19 mortality than did unvaccinated persons." In a similar analogy, drinking a jar of paint thinner will lower your chances of getting hit by a bus while crossing the street. This is the kind of thing that can be both true and undermine the deteriorating credibility of the CDC .What the study perhaps is actually finding is not that the vaccine has benefits in non-Covid causes, but those who get the vaccine are more risk adverse than those who don't want it. You can make up any statement to sell those shots because they're new enough there's no fair way to dispute the statement. ie: Vaccinated men are less likely to erectile dysfunction. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7043e2.htm#contribAff

Covid situation is not going well there according to this report. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-resilience-ranking/

Depends on how the RRR and ARR? Have a read, and decide for yourself. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33652582

Yes, I think that's correct. My rep just made an appointment to get this vaccine passport book. Earliest appointment date is October 26. http://vpassport.ddc.moph.go.th

Ok, i just signed up with the mor-prom app, added 13 digit 60000XXXX number, mobile No. and on 1st attempt error: "does not recognize mobile number" 2nd attempt, successful, received OTP, set up an account with a password and in the app clicked on "Vaccine Covid-19 Certificate", it shows the certificate and vaccine data. barcode etc, If you scan the barcode, it opens another MoPH site with all your details, covid test results, etc,. AND it shows your nationality, which in my case erroneously states "Thai".

I see this error when attempting to register the 13 digit ID number on the mor prom mobile app. The hospital supplying the vax and certificate told me that the app seems not to be working for foreigners at this time. Anyone have a fix for this?

Maybe I am interpreting this statement incorrectly-(The analyses compared specific health events among all COVID-19 mRNA-vaccinated people during the first 3 weeks after inoculation with health events among similar types of patients during the 3 to 6 weeks after mRNA vaccination. The total number of people evaluated was 6.2 million for the first dose of either mRNA vaccine and 5.7 million for the second dose.) Can one infer the conclusion is based on only 3 to 6 weeks of monitoring vaccinated people for health issues during the first 6 months of a study scheduled to run for 2 years? The quote above is from the website in the posters message. Also, this entry in the link noted as well: Federal and Kaiser Permanente researchers combing the health records of 6.2 million patients found no serious health effects that could be linked to the 2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccines" Is this normal for someone to have access to so many health records in US, that I assumed to be private and confidential or are they available to the public, or anyone?

depends who you ask, who has and utilizes the correct data and truly knows what they are talking about. Situation is improving in Denmark, not so bad now. https://www.euronews.com/2021/09/01/denmark-s-high-vaccination-rate-sees-covid-pass-ended-for-restaurants