Jump to content

Naam

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    36,715
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Naam

  1. 6 hours ago, Loiner said:

    i'd love to hear her say "Prime Minister Boris Johnson is an anus horribilis!"


    Very unlikely because she’s a Brexiteer. Why do you think she signed to prorogue Parliament?

    because since centuries it's the done thing based on the undocumented British constitution. "Prime Minister suggests, King or Queen signs". i was one of the few who thought "maybe... perhaps... logic prevails" but got disappointed.

     

    ps. my comment "anus horribilis" indicates clearly that i think H.M. is not a Brexiteer. i think there is some mistunderstanding hint... hint...

     

    the year when Princess Diana died was called by H.M. "annus horribilis" (latin for horrible year). my suggestion was to call BoJo "anus horribilis". google anus!

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. On 9/24/2019 at 5:42 PM, mfd101 said:

    No end of entertainment. At least for non-Brits.

     

    HM will be extremely unamused. The decree issued by her, on 'her' PM's advice, is declared illegal, nul & void. I doubt that she's encountered that at any previous time in her 67 years on The Throne!

    H.M. should have told BoJo to get lost. there could be always a first time in Britains undocumented constitution. a few centuries ago his head might have bee rolling.

  3. 16 hours ago, Enki said:
    On 7/6/2019 at 10:04 PM, Naam said:

    anybody who has the means paying for a solar system generating net 155 kWh/day is used to yields of 7-9% per annum. we are talking of an initial investment of USD 450,000 (perhaps a few bucks cheaper in Thailand because of low labour cost).  

    You must have made a typo, for USD 450,000 you can build a power plant.

    no Sir, no typo. my average daily usage is 155 kWh/day and to provide for that demand the total cost of panels, battery banks and inverters is around $450k.

  4. 14 hours ago, DaRoadrunner said:

    Launder and repeat. It would not surprise me if we see a repeat of 1997. Once the powers that be have drained the Gov't coffers for mega projects and taken their 'commission', we may see a Chavalit style transfer of funds to US$ / £. Only then will the Baht have the rug pulled out from under it and be seen in free fall. Once it hits bottom they will transfer all their ill gotten gains back into Baht again.

    :coffee1:

  5. 4 hours ago, nausea said:

    Yeah, you're right it seems; at least I understand now (I think) what's going on, thanks to the various posters. 

     

    The statement  "there is now no significant difference between offshore and onshore exchange rates"  is misleading to a layman like me though, as the reality is that there is a significant difference between the onshore and offshore rate I can actually get, or am I missing something.

    only an ignorant will realise a significant difference when he deals with a sh*tty financial institution, e.g. British Post Office, Credit Unions and the like. in that context it's worthwhile to mention that i transfer once in a while THB to Thailand from a Singapore bank at a slightly more favourable rate than transferring "hard" currency. difference nothing to rave about but reality killing the ol' mantra "never transfer Baht to Thailand.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...