Fert

I would be grateful if someone could help draft a statement or a lawsuit against the government. I don't speak English very well and use a translator. The basis is the actual deprivation of a Thai child of an official parent on the basis of conditions that were created by the government this month.. The actual obstruction of the extension of the conditions on the basis of which the child was born and is still growing. The child was born in an official marriage, the parents are officially recorded in the birth certificate. There were no requirements for owning 400,000 baht on the account. Due to the fact that the borders were closed, the movement between the countries has sharply risen in price, the requirements for updating visas every 3 months have become financially impossible. I demand either to return the previous conditions for the child, or to recognize such a category of children as illegitimate, to invalidate the birth certificate, since financial evidence of 400,000 was not provided. And to introduce this requirement for the birth of children in Thailand with one foreign parent. To recognize that without 400,000 baht in the account, a foreign parent will not be considered a parent. This requirement should be introduced simultaneously with the termination of extensions of covid visas for this category of people and will continue until the next changes. To make everything clear and understandable. In general terms, the meaning is clear, if they do something that is recognized as illegal, then those laws that allowed them to do it legally should be repealed. And they will have to break their heads how they are going to retroactively cancel the birth of children and the duties of parents.

Changes have taken place everywhere because of the pandemic. But not to such an extent that, under equal conditions, it would threaten prison, deportation and a blacklist. Which actually turns into deprivation of parental rights and orphanhood of a child. They just got used to blurring everything with little things, not accepting the reason and the result.

The fact that a state of emergency exists, covid extensions are applied, but canceled in relation to the parents of Thai children - this goes beyond the logic of normal people.

If the parents have the same problem, I propose to act collectively against the psychopaths in power

See. A basic foundation is used everywhere. If you are ill, you need to establish the cause (basis) of the disease, and not treat the symptoms. If there is a crime, say murder, then the motives are established. Maybe it's self-defense or vice versa, premeditated and planned murder. The types of punishments are completely different. Just like the treatment of diseases is completely different - either you eliminate the cause of the disease, or you treat the symptoms. So, the reason for depriving a child of a parent is the closure of borders due to a pandemic. I consider this an absolutely inadequate excuse, because I intend to protect the rights of the child.

I'll explain. It's easy. The multi-entry visa did not require the declaration of income, since 90 days of stay is the border of automatic residence in many countries (maybe all over the world?) . As soon as you become a resident, they hang income declarations and other things on you. Before the pandemic, the income of 1200-1500 USD was enough for the birth of a child. All basic functions work the same way as long-stay visas (resident). When they closed the borders and created quarantines, the income of 1200-1500 USD turned out to be a little insufficient for border runs. And there is a child. He's already living. I believe that depriving a child of one parent and putting him in prison on the basis of a pandemic is psychopathic nonsense

Married since 2015. The child is 6 years old. Multi-entry visa. Yesterday they made me illegal for the first time in years. My basic income and conditions have not changed and were legal for starting a family and having a child. Now they have made all this illegal. It is necessary to declare infringement of the rights of the child against the government. The Ombudsman? Protecting children's rights?