Jump to content

bocaBob

Member
  • Posts

    136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bocaBob

  1.  

    Some noteworthy and suspicious events have cast the obvious suspicions on the Biden families business activities. Without oversight scrutiny corruption festers and spreads. Investigation of Hunter and the Biden's involved will provide critical answers!

     

    "Hunter Biden’s closest business partner made at least 19 visits to the White House and other official locations between 2009 and 2015, including a sitdown with then-Vice President Joe Biden in the West Wing."

     

    https://nypost.com/2022/04/23/joe-biden-met-with-hunter-biden-business-partner-at-the-white-house/

     

    Video reference: MSN_fox

     

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hunter-biden-business-partner-made-8-additional-white-house-visits-in-2016-visitor-logs-show/ar-AAWCGEH

     

    • Love It 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  2. 16 minutes ago, candide said:

    Why this obsession with public viewing? Hunter is currently being investigated by a Republican prosecutor in relation with the IRS. 

    Why should a private citizen who is neither a politician nor employed by the government be investigated by a House committee? And on matters which are not public matters?

    Transparency, truth, facts, it should be a priority for all. Surely you don't have a problem with the truth? Joe Biden is an elected govt official working for the people and owes nothing less than full transparency to the people. If a prima facia case of the Biden pay for play scheme is brought forth during congressional oversight investigations of Hunter Biden, people have right to know.

     

    • Love It 1
  3. 7 hours ago, placeholder said:

    It's pretty clear why the drug use could be relevant to the defense

    Unless Biden can prove someone forcibly stuck a crack pipe full of crack into his mouth and forced him against his will to get high by smoking crack or some other drug, then maybe, but voluntary intoxication is not a defense to a criminal offense as is "ignorance" is also not a defense.

    He will likely plead guilty, pay fines, home confinement, something like that.

    • Like 1
    • Love It 1
  4. 7 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

    Good link. As suspect, everything alleged without real evidence just like your post. Next. 

     

    Extract from the link below. 

     

    We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement,” the letter reads. But, it continues, “there are a number of factors that make us suspicious of Russian involvement.”

    Way behind the current status. Proven as false.

     

    MSNBC, CNN intelligence pundits who called Hunter Biden laptop ‘Russian disinformation’ yet to correct record

     

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-msnbc-intelligence-pundits-insisted-hunter-bidens-laptop-russian-disinformation

     

     

    • Love It 1
  5. 54 minutes ago, xylophone said:

    Is the Washington Examiner a reputable source of news........no, it is not really a “news source.”

     

    They merely take the news from other popular resources, and then re-write it, adding a conservative “spin” to the event. It is a propaganda tool, designed to sway people’s opinion.

     

    It currently ranks as at the “far right” to “extremist” in ranking, according to Media Bias Fact Check.

     

    “They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.”

     

    main-qimg-88f3d24bafbda982f20381ed80063f6c

    When it comes to the reporting of facts, they were given a rating of “Mixed.”

     

    This means they do on occasion report some facts (but always with a spin). They have also been caught publishing fictional stories, or outright lies.

     

    They are one of the worst examples of media, and they cannot be described as “news” because of the fictional items and the lies.

    Reference to the Washington Examiner seems acceptable here.

     

    • Like 1
  6. On 10/12/2022 at 1:08 PM, xylophone said:

    Is the Washington Examiner a reputable source of news........no, it is not really a “news source.”

     

    They merely take the news from other popular resources, and then re-write it, adding a conservative “spin” to the event. It is a propaganda tool, designed to sway people’s opinion.

     

    It currently ranks as at the “far right” to “extremist” in ranking, according to Media Bias Fact Check.

     

    “They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.”

     

    main-qimg-88f3d24bafbda982f20381ed80063f6c

    When it comes to the reporting of facts, they were given a rating of “Mixed.”

     

    This means they do on occasion report some facts (but always with a spin). They have also been caught publishing fictional stories, or outright lies.

     

    They are one of the worst examples of media, and they cannot be described as “news” because of the fictional items and the lies.

    ok, if you insist.

    I can help you out a little here.

     

    House Republican says Treasury won't hand over Hunter Biden documents unless Democrats join request

     

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-treasury-documents/

     

    "Committee Republicans are investigating whether this change in longstanding policy is motivated by efforts to shield Hunter Biden and potentially President Biden from scrutiny," Comer wrote.

    Comer's May letter cited a CBS News report that more than 150 financial transactions involving the global business affairs of either Hunter Biden or the president's brother James Biden were flagged as concerning by U.S. banks for further review. Large wire transfers were among the transactions flagged.

     

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/house-republican-says-treasury-won-t-provide-hunter-biden-s-financial-docs/ar-AAZhrTn

     

     

    The good news is, all this slow-walking will end after a GOP congress commences their investigations (complete with subpoena powers) into the suspected Biden corruption. These 150 suspicious/flagged international wire transfer records will be obtained, dissected and reported to the public. Real simple, and real effective.

    • Love It 1
  7. Hunter Biden has a potential defense to felony firearms indictment that he may use.

    DOJ fears Hunter Biden could use past drug addiction as defense in gun case 
    "Federal prosecutors who are weighing whether to bring charges against Hunter Biden for tax crimes and making a false statement to purchase a gun are reportedly concerned that the drug addiction that makes one case for them could provide a defense in the other."


    https://nypost.com/2022/10/07/prosecutors-fear-hunter-biden-could-use-past-drug-addiction-as-defense/

     

    Peculiar and seemingly daft way to craft criminal defense strategy as voluntary intoxication is not defense where I come from.

    • Love It 1
  8. 8 minutes ago, placeholder said:

    This is your idea of evidence?

    Just more proof of the regime media covering up for the Bidens.

    Jim Jordan et al will get the evidence sorted starting January 2023. Hunter is merely a pawn in this entire scenario, nobody cares about his. The Biden family is being targeted. The GOP will bring forward any evidence discovered during the planned, televised open investigations.

    • Love It 1
×
×
  • Create New...