Jump to content

dhupverg

Member
  • Posts

    249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dhupverg

  1. So there was a prolfic poster in the covid forum who always used large fonts, bolded fonts etc. on a daily if not hourly basis.  I replied to one of these posts also using bolded and larger fonts.  I was handed a warning for mimicing this writing style.    BTW, this same mod won't address any pm's I've sent  about this. What's with the double standard?   Not a professional look to say the least.

    • Thumbs Up 1
  2. Big pharma and big food are afraid they're going to lose their cash cow.  A sick child is the best customer pharma can have.  Young, and a customer for life.  These grifters are afraid that the much needed cleanup of corruption will take away their huge profits.  Of course it's all hands on deck slinging insults at FRK Jr as pharma and food are huge sponsors of MSM.  There's a reason why there aren't any news stories about the dangers of big pharma and their drugs.  Big pharma pays their bills and they see the writing on the wall.

    • Thanks 2
  3. This topic is outdated fast.  Looking at the chart on the below link, XBB isn't even around anymore!

     

    https://www.idsociety.org/covid-19-real-time-learning-network/diagnostics/covid-19-variant-update/#/+/0/publishedDate_na_dt/desc/

     

    The JN.1 variant is antigenically distinct from the XBB.1.5 variant, which is the current target of monovalent COVID-19 vaccines. Recent research shows that JN.1 is very efficient at immune evasion (even more so than other Omicron variants), resulting in an increased reproductive number. Evidence from a small serological study has suggested that serological protection against SARS-CoV-2 is reduced against JN.1 variants compared to other BA.2.86 viruses among young adults who had received at least a complete primary series of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

    • Thanks 1
  4. 2 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

    Show me a crackpot notion and I'll find you a YTube proponent!

    So you're trying to say that there's no grifting going on in all these causes?  Here's one to start, the 350 million dollar grift to help Gaza aid that is now being removed. I could name 20 more, but I'll let you keep being ignorant to the fact and let you keep your blinders on that all these causes are altrusitic.  Good luck in life, you're going to need it with that nic.

  5. If you want to look up the grifts occuring in the us, they have a website where you can do it.  https://www.usaspending.gov/search

     

    Just listening to  a podcast now about how all the ngo's that are working on the illegal migrant front are raking in hundreds of millions of dollars  in government grants and spending most of the money on payroll, not on actually helping migrants.  

     

    Show me a a cause, and i'll show you a grift.

      Vide

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  6. 13 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

    Yes I was surprised by his turnaround. The debate was indeed a blip a one-off. He was at his normal best in his rallies. Voters will ultimately vote for person with the policies for the people and someone with the right temperament and good character. Trump lacking in all those key elements. 

    It sure was a one-off.  Biden is the sharpest tool in the shed, no doubt. 

    • Love It 1
  7. Lol, the propoganda against the report is strong.  I love how words are put in 50 font and bolded.  No bias from anyone  posting in this thread multiple times.

     

    It's pretty clear all these journals have to say things like "preliminary" "possible" and " the vaccine has still been shown to be effective" otherwise the journals would not publish the data as many doctors have spoken out about.  It's a shame such censorship exists, even in journals.

    • Agree 2
  8. 26 minutes ago, billd766 said:

    Naturally you have all the links and proof of the rubbish you are spouting and you will also be willing to take Dr Fauci to court over it. You do have 100% proof and enough to take it to court, don't you?

     

    BTW what ACTUAL medical qualifications DO you have?

    It's all been right there in the hearings taking place in Washington feauring Fauci's right hand man David Morens and others. Listen to his testimony, read the emails where they talk about needing to circle the wagons.  Tons of evidence if you actually look, but don't rely on msnbc, abc or cnn to highlight this information.  Go to the Senate committee meetings themselves and listen and learn.

    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Thanks 1
  9.  

     

    Any idea why the trials did not involve pregrant women, then just a short time after geting EUA, it was "safe and effective" for pregnant women?  Pfizer clearly omitted pregnant women from the trial, then goes on to safe "safe and effective" with zero supporting data that I've seen.  Surely our resident expert has some data on this for pregnant women that Pfizer submitted to back up this claim.

     

    Has there been a covid thread that our resident expert of all things covid and injection hasn't pulled up multiple links and posted comments in?  Good on Kansas along with Missouri for calling out the lies and omissions from Pfizer?  

    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...