-
Russia Is Providing Iran Intelligence To Target U.S. Forces
In fact, they have been providing weapons for free under the Biden administration. American-supplied weapons have already killed Russian invaders. In a reciprocal response, Russian-provided weapons have the right to kill U.S. invaders.
-
Russia Is Providing Iran Intelligence To Target U.S. Forces
The U.S. is providing Ukraine with intelligence to target Russian forces, while Russia is providing Iran with intelligence to target U.S. forces. It seems fair to me. Moreover, it would be fair for Russia to provide weapons to Iran, just as the U.S. provides weapons to Ukraine.
-
Electronic Repairs in Pattaya - Recommendations?
I went here for some motherboard soldering. They finished the job in 5 minutes and only charged me 50 baht. https://maps.app.goo.gl/33ssB4ccTNM24uPt9?g_st=ic
-
3rd Core Assault Brigade 1st Separate Storm Legion
There is a chance that he is still alive. Currently, small, unorganized groups are leaving the Pokrovsk area; he is probably among them.
-
Show me one real person who regrets not taking the Covid vaccine
Show me one real person who regretted not taking the rabies vaccine after being bitten by an infected animal.
-
Ukraine is winning the war
As far as I'm aware, the prisoners of war do not include any Azov members or foreign mercenaries. Those captured are solely normal Ukrainian soldiers, often forced into the war; the others simply do not reach captivity.
-
Ukraine is winning the war
No surprise here, the army gaining territory will always find more enemy bodies.
-
Putin Bombards Ukraine After Airspace Violations NATO Alarm
This launch cost Russia many millions of dollars. If their target is civilians, then casualties of 3 people sound like an absolutely inefficient result. So either they are so stupid as to repeat such strikes again and again, or their target is not civilians.
-
Will Ukraine destroy the Kirch bridge now & should they bother?
The fact that you're not giving an answer suggests that you know the answer, but it just doesn't correspond to your point of view. You're the one who said that people are the priority, and now you've switched back to legal rights. In my opinion, it was a very big mistake for Putin to take Crimea. It's the primary reason for the situation we have now, and for a situation no one knows where it will end. What makes this fact irreversible is that in his mind, it's his main historical achievement, and it is deeply supported by both the Russian population and Crimeans. The whole country and its dictator are ready to pay any price for it, even the price of the world's existence. For me, this acquisition isn't worth the consequences that have already come, and the consequences that might still come.
-
Will Ukraine destroy the Kirch bridge now & should they bother?
In your opinion, which side will have the majority?
-
Will Ukraine destroy the Kirch bridge now & should they bother?
If it's about the people, then can you answer one question? The people who have been living in Crimea, who were born and raised there, who have not left after the annexation, and who are now the majority in the peninsula, do they want to return to be governed by Ukraine? What do you think?
-
Will Ukraine destroy the Kirch bridge now & should they bother?
Is state.gov credible enough? https://www.state.gov/reports/2020-report-on-international-religious-freedom/ukraine/crimea#:~:text=The Crimean Peninsula consists of,of the peninsula is 2%2C353%2C000. So, using your numbers, the current population in Crimea is around 2'900'000, correct? How did he do it? How exactly did he force 800,000 people to relocate? Can you provide a link to a credible source?
-
Will Ukraine destroy the Kirch bridge now & should they bother?
lets do the simple math. 2'300'000 been in Crimea, 160'000 Ukrainians left, 800'000 Russians imported. So, the current population of Crimea is around 2'940'000, correct?
-
Will Ukraine destroy the Kirch bridge now & should they bother?
Your numbers only prove that there were not "mostly imported Russians" in the peninsula. I will use your figures even though they come from a Ukrainian source, which has a higher chance of inflating the numbers rather than underestimating the reality. According to the numbers from your sources, 100,000 people left during the annexation, and an additional 60,000 left in the following years, for a total of 160,000. In the same period, the population of Crimea increased from 2.3 million to 2.46 million. Let's calculate the number of "imported Russians": (2,460,000 - 2,300,000) + 160,000 = 320,000 This does not make them "mostly" imported, by any measure.
-
Will Ukraine destroy the Kirch bridge now & should they bother?
In 2014, the population of Crimea was 2.3 million. After the annexation, approximately 60,000 people left Crimea, including 25,000 members of the Ukrainian army. The population of Crimea in 2025 is estimated at approximately 2.46 million. How did you conclude that the 'population is mostly imported Russians'?
VBer
Member
-
Joined
-
Last visited