Jump to content

Flyguy330

Member
  • Posts

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Flyguy330

  1. On the subject of AC and costs, do any of you have sound knowledge and experience of Inverter AC's as compared to 'regular' AC's? My AC guy is constantly trying to convince me that Inverter AC's are cheaper to run and I should switch over to them (buying off him of course....mmmm). The limited research I've done is lacking in hard data (locally anyhow) on cost savings, and there are caveats about having to run the Inverter AC's at least 8 hrs a day to benefit in savings. Apparently the only difference is the external unit fan function is 'smart' meaning it modulates better than the old models. I find it hard to believe a simple fan motor could make much difference to the running costs.

    By the way, before I came to Asia an Inverter AC meant one which could be run in reverse (reversible) in winter to blow Hot air instead of cold. I think they are sometimes also called Inverter AC's, or nowadays 'heat pumps'?

  2. Quote

    White guilt complex - hilarious. I stated a truth.

    No you didn't. You stated your opinion. A wrong opinion.

     

    Quote

    Here's another truth. The Internet is polluted with halfwit clowns that don't have the first clue as to why Muslim nations are rejecting Palestinian refugees. 

    I've spoken to muslims about that very subject. There are two main reasons, depending on who you talk to. A Pakistani told me the Palestinians should NOT be evacuated to other muslim nations because they should stay in that muslim land and die as martyrs. I asked if that's fair to the children. He replied yes. Rather reminding me of the slur the Russia backers use when they say the West will fight them to the last Ukrainian.

    The other reason came from an Egyptian Doctor I know. He says Egypt doesn't want the Palestinians because 'they are troublermakers'. Which I found shocking.

     

    Quote

    I look forward to you informing the members of the forum why that is the case. 

    You've been informed.

     

    Quote

    If you'd like to engage on this issue be aware I am from an Irish Roman Catholic family that rejects your delusional view. 

     

    Rejects the occupation of Ireland, and the Famine?

    Your family didn't teach you much history.

    • Like 1
  3. On 5/30/2024 at 10:30 PM, rudi49jr said:


    Have some more Kool Aid, dude.

    Just askin. Elon Musk (owner of Twitter/X) posted the same question on his platform.

    Apparently they were both in their underpants when the cops arrived. And the whole thing took place in San Francisco - Gay Capital of the US.

    Knowing how the US works, with endless lies and covers up, anything is possible. Maybe it's YOU who is on the KoolAid. I'll pass thanks...

    • Sad 1
  4. I'm a sceptic.

    There's a ginormous nuclear reactor 93 million miles from us which pumps out immense energy. It has well recorded cycles, one as short as 11 years, others much longer which are only partly understood but all of which have had - and still have - terrific effects on our planet. These effects are outside our control. The recent events of Aurora Borealis being seen at far southern latitudes in the northern hemisphere are solar cycle (sunspot) related. It's a good clear example of solar cycles and their effect on earth, and they are beyond our control.

    Forest fires in Canada alone last year pumped out 2Bn tonnes of CO2 in one summer burn season. The whole USA emits 6Bn per full year, and it's one of the biggest emitting regions on the planet.

    Volcanic eruptions spew out more CO2 than whole countries do on a regular basis. CO2 out-gassed to the atmosphere and oceans from volcanoes and other magmatically active regions is estimated at 280 to 360 million tonnes (0.28 to 0.36 Gt) per year, including that released into the oceans from mid-ocean ridges.

    Humanity is kidding itself by imagining it can overcome nature. We are insignificant in the big picture.

    Sure - cut down on fossil fuel use - that helps cool geopolitical strife and reduces air pollutants. I'm all for it. But don't kid yourself it makes much difference to climate effects.

    How about instead concentrating all that effort on reducing or eliminating plastic waste in the environment? I find it incredible that so much time is wasted fretting over 'climate change' while ghastly plastic pollution is ignored by comparison. And it's something we can actually fix!

     

    Also - reduce human population. Hey presto - CO2 emissions and plastic pollution all reduced too.

     

  5. I have a question. For all you lot talking about 'she deserved it' because - drugs.

    Until 2022 in Thailand, cannabis was illegal (for recreational use). Possesion was punished by fines and/or imprisonment.

    Then one day, it was legalised, and everybody is doing it, selling it, growing it.

    Then another day and it is declared that a ban is coming to reverse all that, and punishments will no doubt have to be imposed again.

    Neighbouring countries have longstanding policies of executing people found with even small quantities of cannabis for personal use.

    In many countries cannabis use and sale remains legal.

     

    So my point is this - how do you judge right or wrong here? Is it JUST because it's 'illegal HERE today'? Then what if it becomes legal tomorrow - do you feel hypocritical that you now have to accept it as such?

    Do you feel satisfaction when it is banned again?

    I'm not a drug user (the odd glass of wine excepted) so I have no axe to grind about bans. It simply amuses me how people's 'moral compass' works, how it seems to swing around a lot. I'm interested in just that. Is chest thumping moralising really thought through?

     

    I know this woman was caught with heroin, a hard drug, but the moral question remains the same.

    Have at it.

    • Love It 1
  6. Question for Thai Air Asia travellers. Their Baggage Guidelines say they will not allow more than 2 spare batteries/power packs in your carry on luggage (and none in the checked bags of course).

    I've flown Air Asia from many other points in Asia but only the THAI Air Asia rules have this restriction.

    Have any of you run into this issue? It's pretty limiting for me. I probably won't fly Thai Air Asia because of it.

  7. Well guys, since I was a young man I had always wanted a Rolex, but I could never afford it. I bought a Breitling instead and it was my everyday watch.

    when I got to 50 I actually realised finally I could afford that Rolex, a GMT (Pepsi). It was the one I had always wanted. I wear it with pride - but not every day. In fact I later bought two other Breitlings, a Navitimer and a B-1, which I enjoy wearing on special occasions. I think it's only right for a man to have at least one 'special watch'. The ladies can dress up with their earings and rings and necklaces, but since I'm not gay I prefer a nice watch.

  8. 14 hours ago, Jingthing said:
    Quote

    You're entitled to have your own opinions, in this case a completely daft conspiracy theory that gays are in control of straight porn and pushing their anal sex agenda. 

    It's just a theory, sure. But there's a big gay porn industry in the US and I'd be really surprised if none of their producer/directors ever work in straight porn too. If they're any 'good' they'd be in demand. They don't need to be 'in control' of it to have an influence on it. Lets face it, that's where the 'wokeness' in mainstream cinema is coming from. I don't think hundreds of straight film producers/directors just decided one fine day that they all had to start creating more 'woke content'.  So where does it all come from? What's driving it?

     

    Quote

    I have a suggestion though.

    You're a man.

    You have a prostate.

    Which means you're designed to get a kind of pleasure from passive anal sex that women can't possibly get.

    So may I suggest if you want to be truly fair and balanced about this entire anal sex matter, assume the position for the other side. No homo needed either if you don't understand how that can be a hetero thing, see google.

     

    I've no doubt there's a lot of 'confusion' out there these days. But for me, sex and sexual attraction is about far more than just 'getting off'. It is a package of things that starts fundamentally, for me, with a certain aesthetic. I won't insult you by using perjoratives about the aesthetics of male/male sexual behaviour, but I will simply say that the beauty of a lovely womans face, eyes, hair, skin, lips, body, smell, touch, voice and mind can never be matched by the ugly utilitarian form of the human male. I'll admit that ladyboys in Thailand can do a damn good impression. But that's all it is. And when I see one I can spot it right away, and after that all I see is a guy in drag who has spent a fortune on plastic surgery with the aim for fooling the ignorant. But the vast majority of gay men in the West don't look like that. They are the boring ordinary Joe Soaps sitting next to you in the bus. What can possibly be attractive about them? I just don't get it. It seems almost like an intentional rejection of beauty, which runs contrary to every fibre of my being.

    • Like 1
    • Sad 2
    • Thumbs Up 1
×
×
  • Create New...