- Popular Post
-
Posts
260 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by Flyguy330
-
-
13 hours ago, frank83628 said:
it is indeed a psychological disorder, never before have I seen a switch from rational everyday people to rabid frothing psychotic unhinged mental patients at the mere mention of the orange ones name, they literally lose the plot.
Not me bud.
I'm a very stable genius! 😜
-
2
-
-
13 hours ago, Patong2021 said:
Give it a rest. 711 Coalition personnel lost their lives in Afghanistan. The UK lost 457 and Canada 159. These 2 partners drew the 2 most dangerous zones. Other countries like France lost 90, Denmark 43 and so on. And you know what the US response is? Insults, threats and belittlement. Denmark gets threatened, Canada gets threatened. The UK is insulted. And so on. And this comes from Corporal bonespurs of all people assisted by his batboy media clerk VP who skillfully avoided combat in Iraq.The USA is the only NATO member to have invoked Article 5 and all those countries you insult came to the defense of the USA and wasted their resources in a war started by the USA.
The USA is quickly becoming a pariah state because of arrogant obnoxious assaults on the world. Everyone is wrong and only the Trump collective has it right. The USA is going to find itself in a very isolated place with no off ramp and then people will go, why does everyone hate us, and why won't they help us?
You know who is a coward? Elon Musk who called Senator Mark Kelly a traitor, and the Republicans who said nothing. Kelly was getting shot at over Iraq as a combat pilot and Musk has the audacity to insult him. Republicans were afraid to say anything to Musk. That's what cowards do.
Yep - the scales are falling from our eyes. The US is a war mongering brute nation which staggers from conflict to conflict, never winning, always running away from the <deleted> it creates and leaving the rest of us to clean up after it. That's the true measure of Yankee cowardice.
-
1
-
1
-
-
OK, so the Chumps say I shouldn't take him literally.
Forget Day 1.
How about, Day 2?
Day 22?
....32?
How many days is it now since Jan 20th?
Ever?
I think NEVER is quite likely.
How long can you hold your breath oh ye faithful?
Ooops, fail....
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
The Beeb says Trump threatenend Vlad that if he didn't accept the peace deal 'I will bury you' or somesuch.
Now where have I heard that before? Mmmmmm....
-
2
-
3
-
1
-
3
-
First stage out of '3rd world status' - an English speaking population.
All else follows automatically.
So, not likely then...
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Oh dear. The 'I'll fix it on Day One' promise has been well broken, and is consigned to the dustbin of history.
Next!
-
3
-
11
-
2
-
3
-
3 hours ago, nauseus said:
Big drone attack but not the first ever and very possibly not involving U.S. manufactured drones - we'll see. No missiles mentioned.
Now you're back pedalling furiously. 😏
The attacks have happened, you saw the proof.
Three years ago the very idea of Ukrainian bombs hitting the Russian capital city would have been unthinkable. Even as they started getting US weapons the Ukrainians were warned not to attack inside Russia, for damn good reasons too. The ban didn't apply just to missiles. Rapid escalation to nuclear war was possible if the provocation was high. And they refrained from that, even as they proved their drone strike capabilities elsewhere.
Read what I wrote about the forecasters new warning after Trumps hooliganism in the Oval Office. You're now making weak attempts at excluding drones from the ban, FFS.
Incidentally, Ukraine doesn't need US drones. Ukraine itself is manufacturing over 95% of it's drones domestically: Ukrainian drones made up over 96% of UAVs military used in 2024 https://kyivindependent.com/ukrainian-drones-made-up-over-96-of-uavs-military-used-in-2024-defense-minister-says/
Trump has let them off the leash by his stupidity. The restrictions have evaporated. As was forecast.
QuoteWhatever, any attack at this time will not help any truce or other negotiations. Let's see what more news is revealed and what the reaction and return damage is before you continue with your stupid insults.
That's a whole other issue. Hitting back at Moscow reminds Putin and the previously insulated Muscovites that the war can come home to them too. That'll be good for negotiations. A reality check.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, TedG said:
Aginst the Japanese?
YES! They hate them, with good reason. The Japanese carried out monstrous atrocities against Chinese civilians. Read "The Rape of Nanking" (Nanjing).
Japan honours the army which carried out those atrocities. The Yasukuni Shrine is dedicated to them, and is often visited by newly elected Prime Ministers, to the anger of China:
Next Japan PM's potential Yasukuni visit would anger China, South Korea
Random Japanese businesses and individuals are regularly targetted for attack in China because of WW2 resentment in China;
-
1
-
-
And China still harbouring revenge for WW2.
-
1
-
-
On 3/4/2025 at 10:30 PM, nauseus said:
Bollacks. If they do that then that would probably guarantee no more arms from the US..... ever.
Seen the news today bud?
As I predicted....
You look stupid now, don't you....
-
1
-
-
15 hours ago, xylophone said:
The military action in Afghanistan represents a global coalition effort. In addition to the United States, military assets are being deployed from many other nations, including the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, Russia and Turkey.
All of those nations should have stayed out of that. It was military adventurism by the US in their own interests. But the US has always leaned on, and relied on its allies for support. It came too easily because those countries were grovelling little vassals of the US Empire.
I'm glad to see - and I hope it's true - that those days are over, and the next time the US decides to batter some sandpit they'll be told 'Yer on yer own now buddy, eff off'.
Reap what you sow.
-
1
-
1
-
-
The USD is tanking against the Euro.
Money talks.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
So the South African-American's assertion is - Biden delayed the return of the astronauts so that they wouldn't return during the Biden presidency. Rather it was preferable to return the astronauts during the Trump presidency.
Right. That's makes a lot of sense.
To retards.
-
3
-
9
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
14 hours ago, nauseus said:
Bollacks. If they do that then that would probably guarantee no more arms from the US..... ever.
Yeah - like, "Oh, look what you made me do now! You made me stop giving you weapons!". Hilarious.
Still no answers from a single one of the MAGA's here with a logical or reasoned answer on why they now love Russia and Putin, after hating them as a deadly adversary for decades. I'm quite sure they don't even know the answer themselves. They're that weak minded and fickle, whatever Big Donny says is good - so it must be, FK YEAH USA USA USA!!
Donny laid out his strategy when he said 'The EU has screwed America'. His cure for the failure to win economically (he admits it) is to encourage Putin to make war on Europe. That'll show 'em!
That's what it all boils down to.
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
7 hours ago, Yellowtail said:So, Trump is stopping arms shipments to Ukraine. Hmmm, isn't that exactly what Biden did when he took office?
Not to worry, trans' hero Starmer will save Ukraine. They don't need no stinking USA!
I watched an interview on TV today with an expert on 'Russian strategic matters'.
He made a very interesting point on the US freeze in weapons support for Ukraine. He pointed out that Ukraine has so far been restrained from launching full scale missile and drone attacks deep inside Russia by the US. Ukraine has had to limit its attacks in order to retain that US support.
Now its gone there's nothing holding them back now from unleashing on Moscow - just as Moscow has been unrestrained in its attacks on Kiev and other deep Ukrainian cities. Major escalation on the way then! Well done Trumpy.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Speaking of which - anyone noticed the common denominator separating all Trumps 'friends' (loose term in his case for sure) and enemies?
Macron (hugs n kisses)
Starmer (pats on the head)
Israel (bare back blowjobs)
Russia (praise and admiration)
N Korea (big smiles and suck ups)
As opposed to;
Canada (trolled and threatened)
Denmark/Greenland (trolled and threatened)
Ukraine (humiliated and gaslighted)
Panama (trolled and threatened)
Rest Of The World (largely ignored or dismissed)
The obvious answer is NUKES.
He respects 'em all, as long as they have NUKES.
No NUKES and yer a potential takeover target, or a nobody.
-
1
-
-
On 3/3/2025 at 5:11 PM, Harrisfan said:
Nobody supports Russia you twit. They support not wasting money on stupid wars. Got it?
Rubbish! You fought proxy wars all over the globe with Russia for 35 years after the fall of the USSR!
You pointed nukes at them and called them 'the greatest threat' - until China broke out and started eating your industries for breakfast (with the avid co-operation of your oligarchs - including *cough* Elon!).
Try again. We're still waiting.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
16 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:They opposed Communism rather than opposed Russia .
Russia isn't Communist anymore , so no need to oppose them anymore
Hey man, the Soviet Union fell apart in 1989. That was 35 years ago. But the US continued to blackguard the new Russian Federation just like nothing had changed.
So you gave a bull crap answer.
I ask again - why has Russia suddenly become the 'friend' of hardline MAGA supporters? What happened to change their attitude so much that they now SUPPORT Russian aggression? I'm waiting - all ears.....
-
2
-
2
-
- Popular Post
What I'd like the MAGA's here to explain is where and when they (as a movement) had their 'Road to Damascus' conversion from seeing Russia (and the USSR) as the greatest threat EVER to USA! USA! USA! - to becoming 'partners for peace', attacking all former allies, and letting bygones be bygones with the old enemy. Quite bizarre on the face of it.
They've been using the 'Russian threat' excuse for 80 years to terrorise the whole world with the insanity of the MAD doctrine (Mutually Assured Destruction) and also as an excuse for the numerous invasions and proxy wars the US MIC has launched against any country that dared to side with Russia or take aid from Russia (Korea? Vietnam? Afghanistan? Libya? Chile? Cuba? etc etc). And as an excuse to keep their military bases all over the globe, and demanding their allies spend billions to buy weapons from them - to defend against the VERY SAME regime which they suddenly have decided aren't so bad after all. Just misunderstood, all those wasted years.
They've had nuclear weapons pointed at each other for decades, and actual threats of imminent nuclear warfare have been threatened by both sides - most recently by Putin.
Yet suddenly, just like flicking a light switch, these anti-Russian zealots have become little puppies, snuggling up to the old adversary/enemy that they have hated and cursed for all these years.
The rednecks must be rootinging through their wardrobes like crazy, binning all those 'Nuke The Rooskies' T Shirts and baseball caps.
What next? Hanging the Russian flag on the house on May Day?
Such a change of hearts and minds - maybe a kind of admission of defeat finally?
-
3
-
1
-
- Popular Post
America did the same to the Kurds, and ran away from Afghanistan. The world is watching and learning.
Trump says Zelensky is playing with WW3? The way I see it America is doing that by breaking up the Western Alliance and selling out to dictators around the world.
-
1
-
7
-
1
-
1
-
5
-
1
-
Think that's bad? Check this out.
American teen detained in Paris after newborn fatally thrown from hotel window
-
2
-
-
Stick your guns up yer bum.
Ireland is a neutral country.
-
1
-
-
You mean Ireland would have to pay to take it?
Not sure that 50quid would suffice.
Just did a rough calculation on the 15 Billion saving by UK on getting out of Ireland - that'd bring the defense spending up to 3%. A number that Starmer is hoping to reach by 2030 (by upping UK taxes I presume). This is a serious Win Win for Ireland and the UK. The only losers are about 100K hardline Ulster Loyalists - fk 'em.
I should write to Trump with this idea. He'd probably make me Chancellor Of Reunification (COR). I'm pretty sure he could twist Starmers arm to do it if he gets the notion.
Problem solved! (800 year old one).
Oh, and by the way - I wonder how much of the 'defense' budget is actually blown on keeping NI 'under control' (eh, defense, y'know) instead of having those same guns and squaddies over in Ukraine pointing at the REAL enemy!
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:
Where ya getting the money from mate? Tax your peeps more to pay to feed your Muslims and buy new planes?
Wait a minute, wait a minute! I've got an idea!
Last year the UK spent 54 Billion Pounds on defense.
In the same year the UK 'subsidized' Northern Ireland to the tune of 15 BILLION Pounds (that's Billion - with a B).
Give Ireland back to the Irish, put the savings in your defense budget, you might even have enough left over to keep your pensioners from freezing to death.
-
1
-
Russia Rejects Trump's Temporary Ukraine Ceasefire Offer
in World News
Posted
Never saw any other 'politician' blow as hard as Trump.
Are you telling me you believe all his BS?
You're taking him seriously. Or is it literally?
Stop it.