Jump to content

Flyguy330

Member
  • Posts

    260
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Flyguy330

  1. 13 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

     Give it a rest. 711 Coalition personnel lost their lives in Afghanistan. The UK lost 457 and Canada 159. These 2 partners drew the 2  most dangerous zones. Other countries like France lost 90, Denmark 43 and so on. And you know what the US  response is? Insults, threats and belittlement. Denmark gets threatened, Canada gets threatened. The UK is insulted. And so on. And this comes from Corporal bonespurs of all people assisted by his batboy  media clerk  VP who skillfully avoided combat in Iraq.The USA is the only NATO member to have invoked  Article 5 and all those countries you insult came to the defense of the USA and wasted their resources in a war started by the USA.

     

    The USA is quickly becoming a pariah state because of arrogant  obnoxious assaults on the world. Everyone is wrong and only the Trump collective has it right.  The USA is going to find itself in a very isolated  place with no off ramp and then people will go, why does everyone hate us, and why won't they help us?

     

    You know who is a coward? Elon Musk who called Senator Mark Kelly a traitor, and the Republicans who said nothing.  Kelly was getting shot at over Iraq as a combat pilot and  Musk has the audacity to insult him. Republicans were afraid to say anything to Musk. That's what  cowards do.

     

    Yep - the scales are falling from our eyes. The US is a war mongering brute nation which staggers from conflict to conflict, never winning, always running away from the <deleted> it creates and leaving the rest of us to clean up after it. That's the true measure of Yankee cowardice.

    • Like 1
    • Love It 1
  2. 3 hours ago, nauseus said:

    Big drone attack but not the first ever and very possibly not involving U.S. manufactured drones - we'll see. No missiles mentioned.

     

     

    Now you're back pedalling furiously. 😏

    The attacks have happened, you saw the proof.

    Three years ago the very idea of Ukrainian bombs hitting the Russian capital city would have been unthinkable. Even as they started getting US weapons the Ukrainians were warned not to attack inside Russia, for damn good reasons too. The ban didn't apply just to missiles. Rapid escalation to nuclear war was possible if the provocation was high. And they refrained from that, even as they proved their drone strike capabilities elsewhere.

     

    Read what I wrote about the forecasters new warning after Trumps hooliganism in the Oval Office. You're now making weak attempts at excluding drones from the ban, FFS.

     

    Incidentally, Ukraine doesn't need US drones. Ukraine itself is manufacturing over 95% of it's drones domestically: Ukrainian drones made up over 96% of UAVs military used in 2024 https://kyivindependent.com/ukrainian-drones-made-up-over-96-of-uavs-military-used-in-2024-defense-minister-says/

     

    Trump has let them off the leash by his stupidity. The restrictions have evaporated. As was forecast.

     

    Quote

    Whatever, any attack at this time will not help any truce or other negotiations. Let's see what more news is revealed and what the reaction and return damage is before you continue with your stupid insults.

     

    That's a whole other issue. Hitting back at Moscow reminds Putin and the previously insulated Muscovites that the war can come home to them too. That'll be good for negotiations. A reality check.

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, TedG said:

    Aginst the Japanese? 

    YES! They hate them, with good reason. The Japanese carried out monstrous atrocities against Chinese civilians. Read "The Rape of Nanking" (Nanjing).

    Japan honours the army which carried out those atrocities. The Yasukuni Shrine is dedicated to them, and is often visited by newly elected Prime Ministers, to the anger of China:

    Next Japan PM's potential Yasukuni visit would anger China, South Korea

     

    Random Japanese businesses and individuals are regularly targetted for attack in China because of WW2 resentment in China;

    Schoolboy's killing in China sparks Japanese fears

    • Like 1
  4. 15 hours ago, xylophone said:

    The military action in Afghanistan represents a global coalition effort. In addition to the United States, military assets are being deployed from many other nations, including the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, Russia and Turkey.
     

     

    All of those nations should have stayed out of that. It was military adventurism by the US in their own interests. But the US has always leaned on, and relied on its allies for support. It came too easily because those countries were grovelling little vassals of the US Empire.

    I'm glad to see - and I hope it's true - that those days are over, and the next time the US decides to batter some sandpit they'll be told 'Yer on yer own now buddy, eff off'.

    Reap what you sow.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  5. 14 hours ago, nauseus said:

     

    Bollacks. If they do that then that would probably guarantee no more arms from the US..... ever.

     

    Yeah - like, "Oh, look what you made me do now! You made me stop giving you weapons!". Hilarious.

     

    Still no answers from a single one of the MAGA's here with a logical or reasoned answer on why they now love Russia and Putin, after hating them as a deadly adversary for decades. I'm quite sure they don't even know the answer themselves. They're that weak minded and fickle, whatever Big Donny says is good - so it must be, FK YEAH USA USA USA!!

     

    Donny laid out his strategy when he said 'The EU has screwed America'. His cure for the failure to win economically (he admits it) is to encourage Putin to make war on Europe. That'll show 'em! 

    That's what it all boils down to. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. Speaking of which - anyone noticed the common denominator separating all Trumps 'friends' (loose term in his case for sure) and enemies?

     

    Macron (hugs n kisses)

    Starmer (pats on the head)

    Israel (bare back blowjobs)

    Russia (praise and admiration)

    N Korea (big smiles and suck ups)

     

    As opposed to;

     

    Canada (trolled and threatened)

    Denmark/Greenland (trolled and threatened)

    Ukraine (humiliated and gaslighted)

    Panama (trolled and threatened)

    Rest Of The World (largely ignored or dismissed)

     

    The obvious answer is NUKES.

    He respects 'em all, as long as they have NUKES.

    No NUKES and yer a potential takeover target, or a nobody.

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  7. On 3/3/2025 at 5:11 PM, Harrisfan said:

    Nobody supports Russia you twit. They support not wasting money on stupid wars. Got it?

    Rubbish! You fought proxy wars all over the globe with Russia for 35 years after the fall of the USSR!

    You pointed nukes at them and called them 'the greatest threat' - until China broke out and started eating your industries for breakfast (with the avid co-operation of your oligarchs - including *cough* Elon!).

    Try again. We're still waiting.

    • Like 2
  8. You mean Ireland would have to pay to take it?

    Not sure that 50quid would suffice.

     

    Just did a rough calculation on the 15 Billion saving by UK on getting out of Ireland - that'd bring the defense spending up to 3%. A number that Starmer is hoping to reach by 2030 (by upping UK taxes I presume). This is a serious Win Win for Ireland and the UK. The only losers are about 100K hardline Ulster Loyalists - fk 'em.

     

    I should write to Trump with this idea. He'd probably make me Chancellor Of Reunification (COR). I'm pretty sure he could twist Starmers arm to do it if he gets the notion.

    Problem solved! (800 year old one).

     

    Oh, and by the way - I wonder how much of the 'defense' budget is actually blown on keeping NI 'under control' (eh, defense, y'know) instead of having those same guns and squaddies over in Ukraine pointing at the REAL enemy!

    • Haha 2
  9. 1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

    Where ya getting the money from mate? Tax your peeps more to pay to feed your Muslims and buy new planes?

     

    Wait a minute, wait a minute! I've got an idea!

     

    Last year the UK spent 54 Billion Pounds on defense.

     

    In the same year the UK 'subsidized' Northern Ireland to the tune of 15 BILLION Pounds (that's Billion - with a B).

     

    Give Ireland back to the Irish, put the savings in your defense budget, you might even have enough left over to keep your pensioners from freezing to death.

     

     

     

    • Heart-broken 1
×
×
  • Create New...