Jump to content

bg53

Member
  • Posts

    125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bg53

  1. 1 hour ago, Dogmatix said:

    You can easily be tax resident of more than one country. 

     

    It is possible. However most people would want to get out of tax residency. To intentionally get into double or multiple tax residency status to choose which country to pay tax to is a very novel idea. Perhaps it exists in a handful of combinations.

    • Confused 1
  2. 6 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

    under the DTA it is the person who decides in which country they will pay taxes on overseas income earned

     

    DTAs do not work this way. Both Contracting States (at residence/domicile and at source) will have a right to tax (save for exemptions, limitations, non-discrimination or other clauses). The resident has no right to select which country he pays tax to. At best he can claim tax credit under the particular DTA to prevent Double Taxation by both Contracting States.

    • Confused 1
    • Agree 2
  3. 12 hours ago, Roo Island said:

    Many countries already tax foreigners living in their country. Like Portugal, Spain, and now, Belgium.

     

    https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-belgium-parliament-tax-expats-new-regime/

     

     

    Lessons from the Politico article about Belgium's new tax law.

     

     

     

    Quote

    "now they will be taxable on foreign investment income and worldwide professional income"

     

    There is a chance that the new Thai scheme will tax more than that, e.g. capital gains.

     

     

     

    Quote

    that will no doubt have a negative impact on the attractiveness of Belgium and Belgian employers on the market

     

    "People from abroad could easily go to the Netherlands or to France, and there they would have a much higher net salary than they have in Belgium," she said, adding that there is now trend of expats resigning after their employer refused to increase their gross salary to make up for the tax hit.
     

     

    Thailand should consider not just the short-term, top-line revenue gains but all the consequences.

     

     

    • Like 1
  4. 28 minutes ago, Mike Lister said:

    Let me leave you with these thoughts.

     

    Concentrate on this year, the return next January and the things you know are certain.

     

    Set aside the scaremongering and panic of what could happen next year because they may not happen at all, or at least not as currently thought.

     

    Look beyond or ignore the knee jerk responses of some posters, the unfounded worry alone will do more damage than they are worth.

     

    I rate the chances of this being fully implemented by January next year, as very low.

     

    First, I want to show my appreciation for what you did on AN about tax issues.

     

    Second, a reaction doesn't have to be binary (no reaction or full on panic). Look at options and find ways to get around the iceberg. 

     

     

     

  5. 1 hour ago, Lorry said:

     

     

    2. For WHAT do you have to pay taxes?

    A citizen based tax system obviously taxes worldwide income. 

    Residence based tax systems come in 2 flavors:

    A territorial system only taxes income sourced in this country (Philippines work like this for foreigners).

    But most residence based tax systems tax worldwide income, once it has been established that you are a tax resident. 

     

     

     

     

     

    Worldwide basis of taxation also comes in 2 flavors:

     

    1. Assessable income inbound.

    2. Assessable income worldwide.

     

     

    The comment attributed to the RD official is of the second variety.

     

    • Thumbs Up 1
  6. 1 hour ago, ukrules said:

     

    Would you send several million dollars worth of previously untaxed currency into Thailand on the off chance nothing changes and it might not affect you at any point in the next 10 years when they get around to doing an audit on every financial transaction you've ever done since arriving?

     

     

    You don't worry about a problem like the above - you take action and eliminate the possibility of it ever happening.

     

     

     

    I agree. If Plan B involves logistics and the movement of financial assets, it would be wise to lay it out ahead of time.

     

×
×
  • Create New...