Cameroni

The moral bankrupt is you, celebrating the poisoning of Russian soldiers. Spare us your garbage.

It's because Trump positioned himself against the secret services. So they tried to sabotage him.

Looks like we're creating this "unhingedness" by encouraging snowflake rights. Society did extremely well for decades before it was mandated that now looking at a woman wil lbe prosecuted. This woman in the Dominik Bullock case responded in an unhinged way by calling police and making an issue out of someone looking at her. Even 10 years ago this would not have become an incident, since no women would have thought of calling police for someone staring at her. Now with a public campaign about this in London Underground these cases will sky-rocket of course. Anyone who's not deeply uncomfortable with a woman having the power to have you arrested for looking at her needs a reality check.

Emily Hill from the Spectator disagrees with you. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-it-really-a-crime-to-stare/

He didn't do any "unhinged things". He just looked at her. You want men to be prosecuted for looking at someone?

‘Staring’ (Sadiq Khan’s bright red public safety warning reads – with ominous eyeballs popping out of the ‘a’ and the ‘g’) that may be construed as ‘intense’ and of ‘sexual nature’ is now ‘sexual harassment’ and ‘not tolerated’. Should anyone ‘see it or experience it’ they are to text the British Transport Police or dial an 0800 sexual harassment hotline if they want to remain anonymous. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-it-really-a-crime-to-stare/

Protected from what? Looks? Too snowflake for me.

He obviously got angry because of how the girl responded and telling him not to stare at her. So he extended his legs and and refused to move when she told him to. He was not prosecuted for that, he was prosecuted for staring. British transport has launched a campaign to warn men they will be prosecuted if they stare at women. In the UK, a woman can now go to police and accuse a man of staring at her and they will arrest him and he'lll be prosecuted. For looking at a woman. This is not an isolated case.

He stared at the girl which got her all riled up. So they got into an argument. He sat next to the exit and extended his legs and refused to move for her. He didn't touch her and didn't verbally abuse her. She then called police and pressed charges against him. It was the staring that precipitated the prosecution. Indeed in the UK it is now clearly established that men can be prosecuted for staring at women: "Det Supt Sarah White, who leads BTP’s sexual offences team, dismissed the criticism and warned that her force is receiving daily reports of individuals committing sexual offences, including staring, across the country." https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/04/16/staring-tube-could-prosecuted-says-top-detective/ I do have kids, two daugthers in fact and I still find it distasteful that men get prosecuted for looking at a woman.

Lucky you don't live in England, men are arrested there for staring at women. https://www.itv.com/news/london/2022-03-14/man-who-kept-staring-at-woman-on-a-berkshire-train-is-jailed

It's not a "monk scandal". It's a promiscuous Thai woman slept with 10 men and blackmailed them for 9 million pounds scandal.

Letterman was the best. A giant among late show hosts. Colbert is a wet tissue next to him.

Traditional surrogacy involves artificial insemination. You need to inform yourself better, Richard. IVF is just as bad of course. All symptoms of a sick society. All of it should be illegal, artificial insemination, IVF, surrogacy, graffiti, Only Fans...all symptoms of a very, very sick society.

I'm just talking about the hats themselves. Don't get any false ideas. Looks like you're prone to that. Obviously when faced with Trump or Kamala Harris everyone knows who the right choice is. And I'm well known as the most honest poster on this talkboard, ask anybody.

It's not deranged or sickening to support a ban on graffiti or surrogacy. In fact Sweden has banned surrogacy and there's a lot of global support to ban surrogacy: All surrogacy is exploitation – the world should follow Sweden’s ban No country allows the sale of human beings, so why is surrogacy still legal? That something is not quite right about surrogacy has been evident for some time. Ever since the commercial surrogacy industry kicked off in the late 1970s, it has been awash with scandals, exploitation and abuse. From the infamous “Baby M” case – in which the mother changed her mind and was forced, in tears, to hand over her baby – to the Japanese billionaire who ordered 16 children from different Thai clinics. There has been a total commodification of human life https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/25/surrogacy-sweden-ban