The explanation given by Sam Altman is striking even when the question was a bit in a suggestieve style, just look ...
We asked :
"How do you call a law which enables the leaders of a country to enable censorship in a way to suppress freedom of speech, but call it a defamation law ?"
Reply:
A law that enables censorship under the guise of protecting against defamation, but is actually used to suppress freedom of speech and dissent, is often referred to as a:
"Repressive defamation law" or "abusive defamation law"
In legal or political analysis, it may also be described with terms like:
- "Defamation as a tool of repression"
- "Weaponized defamation law"
- "Politicized defamation law"
- "Criminal defamation law (with authoritarian application)"
Such laws are often criticized because they:
- Blur the line between protecting reputation and silencing criticism.
- Are vaguely worded, allowing broad interpretation.
- May carry disproportionate penalties (e.g., imprisonment rather than fines).
In democratic societies, defamation is usually a civil matter, but when it becomes criminalized or used by the state to shield itself from scrutiny, it is widely considered a threat to freedom
of expression.