Jump to content

Kinok Farang

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    816
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kinok Farang

  1. 18 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

    And a nonce apologist.

    But please we should call him by his name, Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. He changed it because it sounded posh and non "geezer of the people" which is the image he wanted to cultivate. Can you imagine a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon inspiring the far right? Sounds a bit posh and forrin', innit.

    I get your point.If he needed to sound hard he would have been much better with a name like Joe Bloggs perhaps?

  2. 1 hour ago, DaLa said:

    I'm all for the right of free speech.  I do not support some of the recent events in the UK where protesters have blocked the roads and supported violent vocal attacks. Thankfully I can live here in los without the angst that is building in the UK. Some of the problems of the UK are being voiced by Tommy Robinson and his supporters and to label him as simply a troublemaker is ignoring those issues.

    Extremely sensible reply,thanks.

    • Like 2
  3. 1 minute ago, ChumpChange said:

    The only difference between this git and the likes of other similar figures like Russel Brand, Andrew Tate, Steve Bannon, Roger Stone, Rudy Giuliani, and other pieces of nasty work of their ilk is that this guy seems to have been held somewhat accountable thus far. 

    See,you're warming to the subject.

    Any more of you conversing with the Brits here and you might grow a sense of humour.

    • Sad 1
    • Haha 2
  4. 38 minutes ago, ericbj said:

    A perspective on the issue and some comments pertaining thereto:

     

    1.  The woman's decision to emigrate to Thailand twenty years ago seems based upon re-joining family members.  A quite natural motive.  Her son was then aged 45.  He seems to be contributing at least as much to her upkeep as the UK Pensions Service.  Which, with his increasing age, a family to support, and economic downturns, is likely becoming increasingly burdensome.

     

    2.  What evidence exists, as alleged in a comment, of the son operating an illegal business?  I.e. that it is not at least 51% Thai-owned.  If unfounded, this statement could constitute a libel; and perjury if claimed in a criminal hearing.

     

    3.  The suggestion she may not have paid NI contributions is unsubstantiated; and besides the point if she is entitled on the basis of payments made by another.

     

    4.  It is true that many Thai workers and their families can subsist on less than this woman.  But they are part of a network of relationships.  Which includes expanding Thai Government social services, including healthcare.  For example, go to a Thai public hospital for an eye operation.  An expatriate will not have it for the price a Thai person pays.

     

    5.  Global economic circumstances have changed radically and unpredictably over the past 2 to 3 decades.  And are changing ever more rapidly now.
    Who can foresee today what the world will be like in 2044?

     

    6.  The Thai economy and Thai regulations, both in substance and application, have dramatically altered over recent decades.

     

    7.  Not every retiree fits neatly into one of two categories:


    Those who plan the move in every last financial detail, down to their final demise; and

     

    Those who throw caution to the wind and come out on a whim, full of blue-eyed optimism.

     

    My personal experience - not typical - but there are doubtlessly many untypical cases:

     

    Came six months, unpaid, in each of a dozen years helping refugees (mostly genuine) improve their English with a view to resettlement in "western" countries.  Discontinued this, but continued coming as result of relationships developed here.  Because of changes to tourist visa (more limited duration), switched to O-A retirement visa.  Changes to O-A visa (health insurance with one of 8 listed companies) forced change to O visa for retirement).  Returned here late 2019.  Due back in Europe mid-May.  But the plandemic strikes.  Return flight cancelled.  Book seat on another flight.  Flight cancelled.  Book again.  Third time lucky?  No!  Flight cancelled.  From the next day, 1st July 2020, all international passenger-flights banned, and borders closed.  When finally the sanctions are lifted (thanks to the damage caused to the world's second largest tourist economy) the deterioration of my health renders the return journey unthinkable, not least because of the physical and administrative challenges to be confronted on arrival.

     

    My impression of immigration policy as currently being drafted by the Thai Cabinet is that it favours short-term tourism where visitors come for several weeks, and spend much of their annual savings in the process.  They seem to be less interested in retirees, unless these happen to be extremely well-heeled.

     

    The politicians may be missing the point that short-term tourism is volatile.  When times are good, it booms.  When a depression sets in, hardly anyone comes.  You only have to look back to 2008 and its aftermath to see this.

     

    Retirees, on the other hand, make a less obvious but substantial commitment to the overall economy rather than to the tourist economy.  They are here, as a rule, for the long term.  It is not easy to up stumps and depart at short notice.  Except upon death.  And then some at least of their assets may remain in Thailand.

     

    There is a case for both types of visitor.

    Can you repeat that please?

    • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...