zmisha

The word "propaganda" suggests that Vlad supporters want to convince you of something. But in reality, they don't want to convince, they want to win in the war through using, or threatening to use weapons. I think that everyone here is smart enough to understand that if Vlad wins, their standard of living will get worse. So, no propaganda for you.

Well, Vladimir often called American leaders Western partners. And partners, as a rule, listen to each other carefully and take each other's opinions into account. And in this case, we again see Vladimir's amazing ability to listen carefully to America and follow its advice. For example, in the US National Security Strategy (NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY OCTOBER 2022, PART III: OUR GLOBAL PRIORITIES, PAGE 26) Vladimir read this - "Russia's conventional military will have been weakened, which will likely increase Moscow's reliance on nuclear weapons in its military planning. The United States will not allow Russia, or any power, to achieve its objectives through using, or threatening to use, nuclear weapons."'. From this, Vladimir concludes that American partners believe that he can achieve his goals "through using, or threatening to use, nuclear weapons". I think it would be impolite not to take into account the opinion of Western partners, and Vladimir is acting quite politely.

As a Russian guy, I recommend you RT for the TRUTH news.

Japanese leader committed political seppuku after this deal. I think that's not enough. He should do a real seppuku.

As a Russian, I would recommend inviting Vladimir Putin as a witness at Obama's trial. Vladimir can definitely help the investigation.

Being a parent would be much easier if the question to beat or not to beat was always answered simply - Yes or No. Unfortunately, there are no simple solutions - constantly beating is bad. But not beating at all is also bad - after all, the child has not yet learned to use the brain to see that he did something wrong. If you do not beat the child because he plays with matches despite your prohibition - you will definitely regret it.

Parents should prepare children to live in the real world. In the real world if you do something against the law, you will be in prison and then enjoy a good beating. Children who were not beaten do not respect the rules and then life beats them for this many times more than their parents could have done.

Many of this men do think so. But the truth is a young man without money and career - he is equally uninteresting to women both in Thailand and elsewhere. Then this man went to Thailand and money appeared in his pocket. And then he see a lot of interested women. The truth is that if the man had not left, he would have seen exactly the same number of interested women in his country. The exception, of course, is pensioners with 20-year-old Thai beauties. This kind of pure love can only be found in Thailand.

They are not wrong. Everyone can create an independent country (with zero territory of course). Its easy. Its free. No one will prevent you from doing this. But if you suddenly decide that your independent country owns some real, non-imaginary land and do this in Russia, Vlad will come to you and start a SMO against you.

79 years according to this - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_and_the_United_Nations

What exactly did you mean by this link?

Well, Vlad supporters strongly disagree with you. Who decided to dissolve USSR? Was this person authorized to do so according to the law? Btw, the renamed USSR still exists in the UN security council.

Ukraine was independent for about 70 years if I'm not mistaken. With 0 territory. Because all the land belonged to the winner of the Second World War, Russia, which was then called the USSR. In the early 1990s, Ukraine, which had been an independent country in the UN for about 50 years, once again declared its independence. Journalists around the world for some reason began to tell their citizens that this meant leaving the Soviet Union. Why did they decide this? Nobody knows. If, for example, France declares tomorrow that it is independent, does this mean leaving NATO? Obviously not.

You are right - nobody can own a country. Ownership is about land. So, Vlad has come for the land which belongs to Russians according to the results of the last WW.

The last owner explained to Ukraine that the ownership was on condition of neutrality. The condition was violated - therefore the ownership was cancelled. And the rightful owner - the brave guy Vlad came to take his own.