annotator

More dishonesty from you. I've already show how women under Nazism were discriminated against in the educational field. Here's a quote from Hitler on the subject: September 1934 Speech to the National Socialist Women’s League: “The slogan ’emancipation of women’ was invented by Jewish intellectuals … If the man’s world is said to be the State … the woman’s is a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. … Our women’s movement … has but one single point, and that point is the child…” https://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/hitler-on-the-role-of-women-1934/ Anybody who reads the whole speech which is linked to can see how dishonest your characterization of HItler's so-called feminism is.

You don't seem to understand the significance of this sentence: "Because of the preponderance of women in the electorate, the NSDAP received more votes from women than from men in some areas before 1932 and throughout the Reich in 1932."

In 1936, a law was passed banning certain high-level positions in the judicial system to women (notably judge and prosecutor, through Hitler's personal intervention[28]) and the medical field. Female doctors were no longer allowed to practice, until their loss had a harmful effect on health needs and some were recalled to work; also dissolved was the Association of Medical Women, which was absorbed into its male counterpart.[25 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Nazi_Germany "In 1934, a Numerus Clausus was introduced to limit to ten percent the number of women in incoming university classes, reversing the trend in effect since 1918. In the years immediately after the Numerus Clausus, fifty percent of male Gymnasium graduates found places at the university but only one in seven female Gymnasium graduates did. The number of female university students nationwide fell drastically from 18,315 in the spring semester 1932 to 5,447 in 1939. (17) https://www.thefreelibrary.com/From%2Badventure%2Band%2Badvancement%2Bto%2Bderailment%2Band%2Bdemotion%3A%2Beffects%2Bof...-a0230778701?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Richard Evans is just another revisionist historian? I guess you don't like him because he exposed the lies of David Irving, a holocaust denier. He is, in fact, one of the most distinguished historians of the Third Reich. And even if it was true that 50% of the vote for Nazis came from women, which it's not, the fact is that there were more women voters than men because WW1 resulted in a significant loss of the male population. Still waiting for evidence that it's "well documented".

Really? You call that quote of a politician by the distinguished historian Richard Evans as well documentd. Here's what Evans says: Richard Evans (1976, p. 157):

Well documented? Share a link with us to those documents.

President Trump is imitating Chinese Communist Party by extending political control ever deeper into economy A generation ago conventional wisdom held that as China liberalized, its economy would come to resemble America’s. Instead, capitalism in America is starting to look like China. Recent examples include President Trump’s demand that Intel’s chief executive resign; the 15% of certain chip sales to China that Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices will share with Washington; the “golden share” Washington will get in U.S. Steel as a condition of Nippon Steel’s takeover; and the $1.5 trillion of promised investment from trading partners Trump plans to personally direct. This isn’t socialism, in which the state owns the means of production. It is more like state capitalism, a hybrid between socialism and capitalism in which the state guides the decisions of nominally private enterprises. https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-marches-toward-state-capitalism-with-american-characteristics-f75cafa8?mod=hp_lead_pos8 I'm all for the tariffs imposed by President Trump. But this approach threatens to undermine free enterprise in America.

And after Pedro Escobar was captured, the whole Mexican drug mafia collapsed? And the drug trade was dealt a substantial blow? Or did business just go on as usual with just some new players at the top of the heap?

Sure. Because no one is going to take his place? What special skillset does Maduro have that makes him irreplaceable?

So far, no denials. That should tell you something,

Somehow, I doubt they'll be bombing crack houses or shooting galleries.

Your source is about as communist as it's possible to be. https://www.peoplesworld.org/

And what about if those cartels decide to retaliate and wage a terrorist war against the US? How quickly do you think American support for such a war would evaporate?

Unfortunately too many of us do. I can still remember that when President Trump reversed himself on H-1B visas, how too many MAGA supporters here reversed with him. The same goes for when he said he was going to spare illegals working in the agricultural, hotel, and restaurant industries. They backed that reversal, too. Now he's going after Russia and not a peep out of those who bitterly opposed the Biden administration's support of Ukraine.

And if Russia can't find someone else to purchase its oil, the price of oil will go up. Not good.