Alan Zweibel

Good point, In fact President Trump found them to be so abhorrent the he pardoned the leader of the Proud Boys. Not just commuted his sentence but actually pardoned him. And other members of those organizations. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/oath-keepers-proud-boys-leaders-prison-after-trump/story?id=117940370

Those damned leftists. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/1-in-5-americans-think-violence-may-solve-u-s-divisions-poll-finds You need to tune up your mind reading antennae.

DOJ Quietly Deletes Study After Charlie Kirk's Death That Says Right-Wing Extremists Engage in 'Far More' Political Violence "Far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists," an archived version of the study reads https://people.com/department-of-justice-quietly-deletes-study-after-charlie-kirk-death-that-says-right-wing-extremists-engage-in-far-more-political-violence-11811580 Here's a link to it on the Wayback Machine website https://web.archive.org/web/20250912005717/https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/306123.pdf

"Many millions more cheered quietly." From fortune telling to mass mind reading. Your abilities are astounding.

Or it's prejudice?

First off, I want to say that I know that I am a fascinating subject for discussion. One that's hard for some to resist. But the fact of the matter is that the topic is not me but the Department of War Declares War on Black Soldiers. Feel free to start a topic about the fascinating character that certainly am in the appropriate forum. But thank you for showing such an interest.

The left went to kill Charlie Vance? And out of all leftists only one actually managed to do it? They can't be much of a threat then, can they?

You mean the database that comes from the anonymous organization calling itself the Charlie Kirk Data Foundation? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/thousands-flagged-to-face-consequences-for-cheering-charlie-kirk-s-death/ar-AA1MBb8D But even in the dubious case that his information is true, 75,000,000 Americans voted for Kamala Harris. So that means so far, based on a very dubious source, less than 1% of the number of Americans who voted for Harris, approved of the assassination.

Public servants should be accountable for their acts. If they can't be identified, they can't be held accountable.

So, in other words, the right wings opposition to cancel culture was never based on principles.

But it is a good thing to see that you've abandoned fortune telling

Charlie Kirk would be appalled.

If that's the case, then why are religious exemptions allowed? Will God or Shiva protect believers?

First off, I'm under no obligation to quote the headline. But if you have a problem with it, contact the mods yourself.

You know, from a moment I was afraid that you might be posting a hypothetical case about something that would happen in the future. Because that would be ridiculous. Clearly you have no reasoned argument to offer so you resort to fortune telling instead.

Another believer in cancel culture.

Is it not a fact that this edict targets black soldiers? Whether that makes it racism or not is up for the reader to decide. as are the justifications for it. That's said, I'm confident you can offer some alternative explanation for this edict which have nothing to do with race.

Are you seriously claiming that a case that the court judge to be lacking grounds in a civil matter, would judge those grounds to justify the government taking action on those grounds? That's just ridiculous. And it's clear that you disagree with Charlie Kirk that there is no such thing legally speaking as hate speech.

So you are claiming that fans didn't call for people who posted nasty words about Charlie Kirk to be punished?

But indefinite religious exemptions are allowed? And of course, it's ludicrous to claim that a beard somehow affects military readiness.

The part I quoted notes that this condition affects 60% of black men. Just like the department of war, I didn't mention racism either.

This is the leftist university website I got my information from: https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/educational-activities/first-amendment-activities/snyder-v-phelps/facts-and-case-summary-snyder-v-phelps The official website of the US Court System. Now surprising how you embrace the practice of the Big Lie.

In the case I mentioned Christian fanatics at his funeral were loudly accusing a dead soldier of being gay. The Supreme Court ruled that was protected. If it is protected in such a case, why wouldn't insults directed at Charlie Kirk not be?

I read it. It specifically ruled that on matters of public interest, there should be no restrictions on the right to free speech.

J.D. Vance is a a world class hypocrite. When one of Musk's Doge workers was outed for his racist posts, J.D. Vance asked that he be forgiven and allowed to continue his work. And given that this guy's opinions could actually influence who got fired, Vance's ask was a lot worse.